Skip to content

· Private foundation

Frank & Dolores Corbett Charitable Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$489k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$528kHuman Services$415kEducation$221kReligion$133kArts & Culture$75kCivil Rights$75kEnvironment$65kPhilanthropy$56kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $338k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES$100,000
FACING HISTORY AND OURSELVES$35,000
INSTITUTE FOR CURRICULUM SERVICES$25,000
CHALLENGE SUCCESS$25,000
AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY$25,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL$25,000
ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND$25,000
HILLEL INTERNATIONAL$25,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$15,000
NORTHSHORE UNIVERSITY HEALTHSYSTEM FOUNDATION$12,500
BRANDEIS MARIN SCHOOL$10,000
NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
KINDLING FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $420k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%LEARNING ALLY INC: $3k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $100k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $100k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $100k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $100k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $5k → 10%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $5k → 14%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 44 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

44 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
16

Total granted

$1.6M
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+30%

Still filing today

57%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $110k · revenue +27%
  • CS
    Challenge Success
    4× · 2022–2025 · $100k · revenue +111%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA
    3× · 2023–2025 · $100k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -83%
  • TF
    THE FLATWATER FOUNDATONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
6
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
7
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
8
Jews of Color Initiative

The Jews of Color Initiatives mission is to advance racial equity in the U.S. Jewish community by centering the leadership of Jews of Color and ensuring that our communities and institutions reflect the multiracial reality of the Jewish…

Civil Rights
9
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
10
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
11
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
12
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma; the most unlike its peers is Veterans Health Action Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
31/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY: $110,000 · OtherAMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETYISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $110,000 · OtherISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INCJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA: $100,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & …PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $85,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODNORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherNORTHSHORE UNIVERSITY HEALTHSYSTEM FOUNDATION: $52,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $50,000 · OtherKINDLING FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · Other+34 more: $499,000 · Other+34 moreJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $405,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHI…+3 more: $14,500 · Human ServicesChallenge Success: $100,000 · EducationChallenge Suc…University of Chicago: $85,000 · EducationUniversity of…INSTITUTE FOR CURRICULUM SERVICES: $50,000 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR…CHALLENGE DAY FUND: $15,000 · EducationCHALLENGE DAY…+2 more: $11,000 · EducationFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureIndependent Arts & Media: $15,000 · Arts & CultureBrothers for Life: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCasa Italia Inc: $5,000 · Arts & CultureHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $75,000 · ReligionCOLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC: $15,000 · ReligionJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $50,000 · PhilanthropyHighland Park Community Foundation: $27,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMichael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation: $5,000 · PhilanthropyALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $43,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · Health
Other$1,156,500Human Services$419,500Education$261,000Arts & Culture$105,000Religion$90,000Philanthropy$87,000Health$48,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $405,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $110,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetChallenge Success: $100,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA: $100,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $85,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR CURRICULUM SERVICES: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $43,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHighland Park Community Foundation: $27,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE THRESHOLDS: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREX FOUNDATION: $23,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetHEAD COUNT INC: $22,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA WATCH: $20,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCHALLENGE DAY FUND: $15,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCOLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetIndependent Arts & Media: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVeterans Health Action Inc: $12,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBrothers for Life: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE BOUND OPPORTUNITIES: $6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FLATWATER FOUNDATON: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMichael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCasa Italia Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZEN HOSPICE PROJECT DBA ZEN CAREGIVING PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLearning Ally Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUILD INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIGHORN RIVER ALLIANCE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Challenge Success ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR CURRICULUM SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Highland Park Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE THRESHOLDS ↗
  • Who funds REX FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEAD COUNT INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA WATCH ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGE DAY FUND ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC ↗
  • Who funds Independent Arts & Media ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP ↗
  • Who funds Veterans Health Action Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA16.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The San Francisco Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frank & Dolores Corbett Charitable Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frank & Dolores Corbett Charitable Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Learning Ally Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Frank & Dolores Corbett Charitable Fund?

Find your warmest path to Frank & Dolores Corbett Charitable Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Frank & Dolores Corbett’s filings →

More from the funding graph