Skip to content

· Private foundation

Frances Maddox Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$296k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$635kHuman Services$496kAnimals$420kFood & Nutrition$172kCivil Rights$155kArts & Culture$117kReligion$103kHealth$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $257k
$13,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BRIDGE$25,000
PANHANDLE PAWS OF HOPE$25,000
THE PARC$20,000
EVELINE'S SUNSHINE COTTAGE$18,000
THE MAVERICK BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$15,500
AMARILLO AREA CASA$15,000
LIFE CHALLENGE AMARILLO$15,000
PETS LOW COST SPAY & NEUTER$15,000
DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
AMARILLO SPCA$13,000
FRIENDS OF AJ SWOPE$13,000
FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO$12,500
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MARTHA'S HOME$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $368k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%THE PARC: $35k → 20%THE PARC: $35k → 20%THE PARC: $30k → 20%THE PARC: $30k → 20%THE PARC: $30k → 20%THE PARC: $25k → 20%THE PARC: $20k → 20%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $13k → 20%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $13k → 20%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $10k → 20%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $10k → 20%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $10k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO: $15k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO: $15k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO: $15k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO: $15k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO: $13k → 20%THE BRIDGE: $25k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO: $10k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 24 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
4

Total granted

$2.3M
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+46%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHousing & ShelterArts & CultureReligionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PARC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $205k · revenue +133%
  • DW
    DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $159k · revenue +7%
  • PP
    PANHANDLE PAWS OF HOPE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $157k · revenue +107% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

  • HF
    Hidden Falls Ranchgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +46%
  • MA
    MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • CO
    CENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
2nd Chance Ranch and Rescue

Sanctuary for abused or abandoned animals

Animals
2
Animal Rescue League of El Paso Inc

Animal rescue league of el paso is a no-kill animal shelter. we serve abandoned, injured & abused companion animals by providing medical care and locating lifelong homes

Animals
3
Humane Society of Central Texas

As an advocate for the community goal of maintaining its no kill status, the humane society provides adoption, rescue and foster opportunities for the homeless animals at the city of waco animal shelter, as well as community education…

Animals
4
Humane Society of Aransas County

Humane animal shelter

Animals
5
Animal Friends of Port Aransas Inc

Provide veterinary and shelter services for displaced and wayward animals in the township and outlying area of port aransas, texas.

Animals
6
Texas Round Up Animal Alliance Inc

Adoption and shelter facility for unwanted, abandoned and neglected animals. provide aid to the community who need help with vetting or care of their animals.

Animals
7
Abilene Hope Haven Inc

To provide basic needs and services to homeless individuals who are willing to commit to improving their lifestyle.

Housing & Shelter
8
Hendrick Home for Children
—
9
Lone Star Sanctuary for Animals Inc

Shelter, food and veterniary care provided for animals in a clean shelter environment. this is a no-kill facility. animals are neutered, vaccinated, microchipped prior to being adopted. every effort is made to educate the community about…

Animals
10
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
11
Animal Rescue Foundation Inc

Animal rescue foundation inc (arf) rescues homeless dogs and cats in the tulsa area and helps them find loving homes. we do this by rescuing homelss animals out of area shelters, accepting owner surrendered pets, placing them in foster…

Animals
12
Central Texas Animal Sanctuary

Animal rescue and rehabilitation

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Life Challlenge of Amarillo Inc; the most unlike its peers is Transformation Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $159,000 · OtherDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INCHIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $156,750 · OtherHIGH PLAINS FOOD BANKLIFE CHALLLENGE OF AMARILLO INC: $115,000 · OtherLIFE CHALLLENGE OF AMARILLO INCIndividual grant recipient: $114,079 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNOVO MINISTRIES INC: $80,000 · OtherNOVO MINISTRIES INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY AMARILLO: $58,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY AMARILLO+6 more: $83,500 · Other+6 moreEVELINE'S SUNSHINE COTTAGE: $208,000 · Human ServicesEVELINE'S SUNSHINE COTTAGETHE PARC: $205,000 · Human ServicesTHE PARCFAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO: $82,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF …ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $55,000 · Human ServicesANOTHER CHANCE HOUSETHE BRIDGE: $25,000 · Human ServicesPANHANDLE PAWS OF HOPE: $156,829 · AnimalsPANHANDLE PAWS OF HO…PETS LOW COST SPAY & NEUTER: $106,000 · AnimalsPETS LOW COST SPAY &…AMARILLO SPCA: $93,079 · AnimalsAMARILLO SPCAANIMAL RESCUE SHELTER INC ANIMAL RESCUE SHELTER INC: $54,079 · AnimalsANIMAL RESCUE SHELTE…+1 more: $10,000 · AnimalsMARTHA'S HOME INC: $144,750 · Housing & ShelterCENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $7,000 · Housing & ShelterTRANSFORMATION PARK: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterAMARILLO AREA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $155,000 · Civil RightsDON HARRINGTON DISCOVERY CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $73,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF AJ SWOPE: $44,000 · Arts & CultureSHARING HOPE MINISTRY INC: $103,000 · ReligionTURN CENTER: $60,000 · Health
Other$766,829Human Services$575,500Animals$419,987Housing & Shelter$157,750Civil Rights$155,000Arts & Culture$117,000Religion$103,000Health$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEVELINE'S SUNSHINE COTTAGE: $208,000 over 9y, 11% of budgetTHE PARC: $205,000 over 7y, 9.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $159,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetPANHANDLE PAWS OF HOPE: $156,829 over 8y, 29% of budgetHIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $156,750 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAMARILLO AREA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $155,000 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetMARTHA'S HOME INC: $144,750 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetLIFE CHALLLENGE OF AMARILLO INC: $115,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetPETS LOW COST SPAY & NEUTER: $106,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetSHARING HOPE MINISTRY INC: $103,000 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetAMARILLO SPCA: $93,079 over 8y, 6.0% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO: $82,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetNOVO MINISTRIES INC: $80,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetDON HARRINGTON DISCOVERY CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $73,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetTURN CENTER: $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $55,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE SHELTER INC ANIMAL RESCUE SHELTER INC: $54,079 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF AJ SWOPE: $44,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetHOPE LIVES HERE: $10,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetHidden Falls Ranch: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTRANSFORMATION PARK: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EVELINE'S SUNSHINE COTTAGE ↗
  • Who funds THE PARC ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PANHANDLE PAWS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds HIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds AMARILLO AREA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE CHALLLENGE OF AMARILLO INC ↗
  • Who funds PETS LOW COST SPAY & NEUTER ↗
  • Who funds SHARING HOPE MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMARILLO SPCA ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO ↗
  • Who funds NOVO MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds DON HARRINGTON DISCOVERY CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TURN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE SHELTER INC ANIMAL RESCUE SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF AJ SWOPE ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE LIVES HERE ↗
  • Who funds Hidden Falls Ranch ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds TRANSFORMATION PARK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amarillo Area Foundation IncTX44.6× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · Xcel Energy Foundation · Mary E Bivins Foundation · Amarillo Business Foundation · Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts Balliett Foundation · Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust · High Plains Christian Ministries Foundation · Mays Foundation · Kimble Foundation Trust · Ned O and Linda Miller Charitable · William & Louise Mullins Foundation · Bruckner Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frances Maddox Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frances Maddox Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Frances Maddox Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Frances Maddox Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Frances Maddox’s filings →

    More from the funding graph