Skip to content
Fox Family Kalb Foundation Dba Fox Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Fox Family Kalb Foundation Dba Fox Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
55
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$3.4MHealth$1.7MCrime & Legal$809kArts & Culture$495kHuman Services$313kCivil Rights$188kPhilanthropy$176kFood & Nutrition$104kOther$0
02FY2025 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $451k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.3M
$15,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT HORSESHOE FARM$1,000,000
CEDARS SINAI$755,000
CITY YEAR INC$300,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$275,000
OTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN$155,000
NEW VENTURE FUND$150,000
ALLIANCE COLLEGE READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$125,000
THE UCLA FOUNDATION$106,500
AFTER INNOCENCE$75,000
HALE COUNTY HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY$75,000
US SKI & SNOWBOARD$56,000
LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION$55,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$53,250
ALTASEA AT THE PORT OF LA$50,000
ARTS BRIDGING THE GAP$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $349k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $20k → 14%CHAMBER OF MOTHERS: $10k → 10%THE LAUNDRY TRUCK LA: $5k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $3k → 14%THE CHANGE REACTION: $15k → 14%REDISCOVER CENTER: $75k → 14%REDISCOVER CENTER: $32k → 14%REDISCOVER CENTER: $30k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $25k → 14%VISIONARY WOMEN: $15k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $25k → 14%VISIONARY WOMEN: $15k → 14%VISIONARY WOMEN: $15k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $10k → 14%VISIONARY WOMEN: $10k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $5k → 14%ANGEL CITY ALLIANCE: $5k → 14%ANGEL CITY ALLIANCE: $5k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $10k → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $5k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $5k → 14%COLIN FARRELL FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
VA
AZ
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.4M · 36 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
48

Total granted

$7.4M
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+3%

Still filing today

89%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $542k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +11%
  • PH
    PROJECT HORSESHOE FARM
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +115%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +92% · 76% of their budget

Funded once

  • BT
    BET TZEDEK LEGAL SERVICES
    one grant, 2024 · $375k
  • BT
    BET TZEDEK
    one grant, 2023 · $374k · revenue +11%
  • SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $125k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
2
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

—
3
Arts for La

Arts for la leads communities, artists and organizations to advocate for an equitable, healthy, and creative los angeles region through the arts.

Arts & Culture
4
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
5
Cooperation L a

The L.A. Co-op Lab is a collective that builds capacity for worker ownership in Los Angeles as a pathway toward a more equitable and democratic economy.

Arts & Culture
6
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
7
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
8
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
9
Los Angeles Conservation Corps

The la conservation corps creates equitable opportunities for young people to build resilience in themselves, their communities and the environment through a program of work, education and support.

Employment
10
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
11
Youth Policy Institute Inc

Youth policy institute (ypi) transforms los angeles neighborhoods, reducing poverty by offering cradle to college & career services.

—
12
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint John's Health Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Laundry Truck La. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
88/88
Grantees still filing
55/88
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Michigan: $1,050,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganCITY YEAR INC: $830,780 · OtherCITY YEAR INCBET TZEDEK LEGAL SERVICES: $375,000 · OtherBET TZEDEK LEGAL SERVICESBET TZEDEK: $373,500 · OtherBET TZEDEKPS ARTS: $163,800 · OtherLIFT INC: $165,000 · Other+50 more: $1,737,068 · Other+50 moreUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,365,620 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORN…ALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $807,875 · EducationALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC S…UCLA FOUNDATION: $324,500 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONOTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $289,500 · EducationOTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGNUniversity of Chicago: $237,500 · EducationUniversity of Chicago+9 more: $174,000 · Education+9 moreCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $1,505,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MED…+8 more: $154,780 · Health+8 morePROJECT HORSESHOE FARM: $1,100,000 · Housing & ShelterPROJECT HO…+1 more: $12,500 · Housing & ShelterSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $125,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PASADENA PLAYHOUSE STATE THEATRE OF CALIFORNIA INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureARTS BRIDGING THE GAP: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMON SENSE MEDIA: $49,040 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · Arts & CultureCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE H E ART PROJECT dba ARTWORXLA: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $22,500 · Arts & CultureREDISCOVER CENTER INC: $136,800 · Human ServicesProyecto Pastoral: $65,000 · Human ServicesVISIONARY WOMEN: $55,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHANGE REACTION: $15,000 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH CENTER: $15,000 · Human Services+6 more: $42,500 · Human ServicesAMERICA ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyYouth Business Alliance Inc: $25,000 · PhilanthropySOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS: $19,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA: $11,000 · PhilanthropyBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD: $10,000 · PhilanthropyFIND YOUR LIGHT FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$4,695,148Education$3,198,995Health$1,659,780Housing & Shelter$1,112,500Arts & Culture$381,540Human Services$349,300Philanthropy$225,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $1,505,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,365,620 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HORSESHOE FARM: $1,100,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $1,050,000 over 4y, 76% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $830,780 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $807,875 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBET TZEDEK: $373,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $324,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $289,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $237,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIFT INC: $165,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPS ARTS: $163,800 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetREDISCOVER CENTER INC: $136,800 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $125,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHuman-I-T: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICA ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSEEN AND HEARD: $68,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetProyecto Pastoral: $65,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PASADENA PLAYHOUSE STATE THEATRE OF CALIFORNIA INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetVISIONARY WOMEN: $55,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCreate CA: $55,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $54,280 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASCENDIGO AUTISM SERVICES INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOFFEE WITH A CAUSE: $50,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetCOMMON SENSE MEDIA: $49,040 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND: $44,150 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWATTS LEARNING CENTER INC: $34,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetACUMEN FUND INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INC OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $30,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN ASSOCIATION OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLULU'S PLACE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYouth Business Alliance Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetREADY TO SUCCEED: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEFY VENTURES INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHANGE REACTION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK GIRL VENTURES FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUCLA BLACK ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetThe Pad Project: $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE H E ART PROJECT dba ARTWORXLA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …The Ralph M Parsons F…The Ahmanson Foundati…Snap FoundationThe Annenberg Foundat…The Rose Hills Founda…Joseph Drown Foundati…The J Paul Getty TrustJewish Community Foun…Weingart FoundationThe Carol and James C…Visionary Women
California Community FoundationCA41.7× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Snap Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Joseph Drown Foundation · The J Paul Getty Trust · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Weingart Foundation · The Carol and James Collins Foundation · Visionary Women

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fox Family Kalb Foundation Dba Fox Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fox Family Kalb Foundation Dba Fox Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fox Family Kalb Foundation Dba Fox Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fox Family Kalb Foundation Dba Fox Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 111 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fox Family Kalb Foundation Dba Fox’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home