Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fountain 33 Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$792k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$3.1MPhilanthropy$2.5MHealth$1.2MHuman Services$247kArts & Culture$176kYouth Development$83kAnimals$70kEnvironment$70kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $403k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
$82,948
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAPLES CHILDREN & EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC$792,173
DAVID LAWRENCE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC$250,000
YOUTH HAVEN INC$112,050
COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC$86,000
Individual grant recipient$82,948
STARABILITY FOUNDATION$65,815
2L FOUNDATION$56,121
IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION$40,000
NAPLES ZOO$10,000
Individual grant recipient$3,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $247k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%2L FOUNDATION: $56k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN INC: $112k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN INC: $56k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN INC: $23k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.6M · 11 repeat orgs$851k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
7

Total granted

$6.6M
$672k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+87%

Still filing today

91%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $179k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyEducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +28%
  • NC
    NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +277%
  • SF
    STARABILITY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $405k · revenue +952%

Funded once

  • UN
    US NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $325k · revenue +87%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $132k
  • SC
    SWFL CHILDREN'S CHARITIES INC SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WINE & FOOD FESTgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $92k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mote Marine Laboratory Inc

The advancement of marine and environmental sciences through scientific research, education and public outreach, leading new discoveries, revitalization and sustainability of our oceans and greater public understanding of our marine…

—
2
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
3
The Everglades Foundation Inc

The mission of the foundation is to restore and protect america's everglades through its three programmatic pillars: science, advocacy and education. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc

In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…

Environment
5
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
6
Variety Children's Hospital

To inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child.

Health
7
Clinic for the Rehabilitation of Wildlife Inc

The clinic for the rehabilitation of wildlife is a teaching hospital and visitor center dedicated to the saving of wildlife through state-of-the-art veterinary care, research, education, and conservation medicine.

Animals
8
Sanibel Sea School Inc

Improve the ocean's future, one person at a time, in order to live in a world where all people value, understand, and care for the ocean.

—
9
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
10
Florida Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

Working in partnership with state business leaders to secure florida's future.

—
11
Texas State Aquarium Association

The texas state aquarium's mission is engaging people with animals, inspiring appreciation for our seas, and supporting wildlife conservation. its vision is to be a global leader in fostering support for the conservation of the gulf of…

Animals
12
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Children Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is League to Save Lake Tahoe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $2,448,492 · PhilanthropyNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INCSTARABILITY FOUNDATION INC: $404,995 · PhilanthropySTARABILITY FOUNDATION INCLEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $180,000 · PhilanthropyLEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC+2 more: $131,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC: $2,725,160 · EducationCOMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INCUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $325,000 · EducationUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INCDAVID LAWRENCE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $383,410 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $60,258 · HealthIndividual grant recipient: $131,779 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $82,948 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $16,500 · OtherNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $25,750 · OtherLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE: $24,000 · OtherYOUTH HAVEN INC: $190,740 · Human Services2L FOUNDATION INC: $56,121 · Human ServicesGOLISANO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NAPLES INC: $129,160 · Arts & CultureNAPLES ZOO INC: $70,000 · Animals
Philanthropy$3,164,987Education$3,050,160Health$443,668Other$380,977Human Services$246,861Arts & Culture$129,160Animals$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC: $2,725,160 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $2,448,492 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetSTARABILITY FOUNDATION INC: $404,995 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetDAVID LAWRENCE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $383,410 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $325,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC: $190,740 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetGOLISANO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NAPLES INC: $129,160 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetSWFL CHILDREN'S CHARITIES INC SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WINE & FOOD FEST: $91,500 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetNAPLES ZOO INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $60,258 over 3y, 0.0% of budget2L FOUNDATION INC: $56,121 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $25,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE: $24,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Collier Community Foundation IncFL13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fountain 33 Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fountain 33 Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
  • David Lawrence Mental Health Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Youth Haven Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fountain 33 Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Fountain 33 Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fountain 33’s filings →

More from the funding graph