Skip to content
Foundation of the Heart at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Foundation of the Heart

Together with partner churches, conducts christian worship, bible study and prayer, and assists individuals from partner churches in their journey from success to meaning, addictions to freedom and selfishness to god's call through evangelism and discipleship.

$721k
Granted FY2020
10
Grants FY2020
4
States reached
$450k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

63% of Foundation of the Heart’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Triangle Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

01What it funds
01FY2020 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $219k
  • $250k+1 grant · $450k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRIANGLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$450,000
OAKLEY INTEGRATIVE DEVELOPMENT$119,000
EXPONENTIAL IMPACT$100,000
US OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC MUSEUM$20,000
KINGDOM FOUNDATION$10,000
PARENTS CHALLENGE$10,000
ENGINEERING MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL$4,000
FORGE EVOLUTION$2,500
CULTURAL OFFICE F THE PIKE PEAK REGION$2,500
PIKES PEAK UNITED WAY$2,500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 17% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OAKLEY INTEGRATIVE DEVELOPMENT: $119k → 14%TRIANGLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $450k → 11%KINGDOM FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%EXPONENTIAL IMPACT: $100k → 9%US OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC MUSEUM: $20k → 9%ENGINEERING MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 9%FORGE EVOLUTION: $3k → 9%PIKES PEAK UNITED WAY: $3k → 9%PARENTS CHALLENGE: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
2
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
3
Partners for Youth Opportunity

Partners for Youth Opportunity (PYO) disrupts systemic inequality by partnering with Durham youth to access the educational, economic, and social assets they need to experience a self-determined and sustainable life.

—
4
E3 Education Excellence & Equity

E3 transforms educational equity by reframing excellence. through training, coaching, and specialized tools, e3 supports educators to embrace the diverse lived experiences of all students and supports students in actualizing their…

Crime & Legal
5
The Verge Entrepreneurship Hub Foundation
Community Improvement
6
Utah's Promise

Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.

Philanthropy
7
Endeavor Colorado

Endeavor colorado is a not-for-profit leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in colorado to catalyze long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in our region. high-impact…

Community Improvement
8
Pikes Peak School of Expeditionary Learning

Provide education for students in Pre-K through 8th grade, benefitting approximately 415 students.

Education
9
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

—
10
Ten Talents Global Initiatives
Human Services
11
Endeavor Global Inc (F/K/a the Endeavor Initiative Inc)

Endeavor is leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement around the world.

International
12
Exalt Youth

Exalt youth serves youth involved in the criminal justice system, moving them away from incarceration towards re-engagement with education and meaningful job opportunities. our students come from some of the most economically depressed…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parents Challenge; the most unlike its peers is Kingdom Foundations. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRIANGLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $450,000 · PhilanthropyTRIANGLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyOAKLEY INTEGRATIVE DEVELOPMENT: $119,000 · OtherOAKLEY INTEGRATIVE…Exponential Impact: $100,000 · Community ImprovementExponential Imp…United States Olympic and Paralympic Museum: $20,000 · Arts & CultureCULTURAL OFFICE OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $2,500 · Arts & CulturePARENTS CHALLENGE: $10,000 · EducationKINGDOM FOUNDATIONS: $10,000 · ReligionENGINEERING MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL USA: $4,000 · Science & TechForge Evolution: $2,500 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$452,500Other$119,000Community Improvement$100,000Arts & Culture$22,500Education$10,000Religion$10,000Science & Tech$4,000Crime & Legal$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRIANGLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $450,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetExponential Impact: $100,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetUnited States Olympic and Paralympic Museum: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARENTS CHALLENGE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetKINGDOM FOUNDATIONS: $10,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetENGINEERING MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL USA: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetForge Evolution: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCULTURAL OFFICE OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPIKES PEAK UNITED WAY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Joseph Henry Edmo…Adolph Coors Foundati…T Rowe Price Foundati…Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Joseph Henry Edmondson FoundationCO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Adolph Coors Foundation · T Rowe Price Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foundation of the Heart funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foundation of the Heart. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Foundation of the Heart?

    Find your warmest path to Foundation of the Heart through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Foundation of the Heart’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home