Loading…
· Public charity
FOUNDATION OF THE HEART
Brings people and partner churches together for christian worship through conferences, retreats and literature.
$721k
Granted FY2020
10
Grants
4
Communities
$450k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2020 · 10 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k4 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $219k
- $250k+1 grant · $450k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
- TRIANGLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$450,000
- OAKLEY INTEGRATIVE DEVELOPMENT$119,000
- EXPONENTIAL IMPACT$100,000
- US OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC MUSEUM$20,000
- KINGDOM FOUNDATION$10,000
- PARENTS CHALLENGE$10,000
- ENGINEERING MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL$4,000
- PIKES PEAK UNITED WAY$2,500
- FORGE EVOLUTION$2,500
- CULTURAL OFFICE F THE PIKE PEAK REGION$2,500
02The need
02
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 11%. 17% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Pikes Peak School of Expeditionary Learning
Provide education for students in Pre-K through 8th grade, benefitting approximately 415 students.
Education
2
United States Olympic and Paralympic
Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes.
Recreation & Sports
3
Partners for Youth Opportunity
Partners for Youth Opportunity (PYO) disrupts systemic inequality by partnering with Durham youth to access the educational, economic, and social assets they need to experience a self-determined and sustainable life.
—
4
The Peak School
The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…
Education
5
Peak Partnership
Peak partnership shall be operated exclusively for: (i) the promotion of social welfare by developing and advocating for legislation, regulations, and government programs to improve the environment, ...see continuation on schedule o
Human Services
6
Activate Work Inc
We provide training, coaching, community supports and access to leading colorado employers enabling coloradans to acheive economic security, mobility and prosperity.
Human Services
7
Pikes Peak Athletic Foundation
Recreation & Sports
8
Suicide Prevention Partnership-Pikes Pea
The mission of pikes peak suicide prevention partnership is to unite the community in addressing suicide in the pikes peak region through education, intervention, and postvention.
Health
9
Utah's Promise
We build powerful cross-sector partnerships to help every utahn achieve their potential.
Philanthropy
10
Innovate Public Schools
Build the parent and community demand for world-class public schools, and to accelerate the growth of these schools, particularly for low-income students, students of colors, and students with special needs.
Philanthropy
11
Future Problem Solving Program
Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…
—
12
Puede Network
PUEDENetwork empowers youth to learn lead and thrive by providing programs that promote academic success healthy living leadership development community engagement and athletic participation. Through its C.L.A.V.E. framework the…
Community Improvement
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pikes Peak United Way and the most unlike its peers is Kingdom Foundations. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$569,000Community Improvement$100,000Arts & Culture$22,500Education$10,000Religion$10,000Science & Tech$4,000Crime & Legal$2,500Philanthropy$2,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Pikes Peak Community FoundationCO18× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Pikes Peak Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation FOUNDATION OF THE HEART funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: EXPONENTIAL IMPACT.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~38 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 9 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
9 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 8.2× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 822707012 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on EXPONENTIAL IMPACT, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 38 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 15% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Foundation of the Heart?
Find your warmest path to Foundation of the Heart through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines