Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Foundation of the Heart

Together with partner churches, conducts christian worship, bible study and prayer, and assists individuals from partner churches in their journey from success to meaning, addictions to freedom and selfishness to god's call through evangelism and discipleship.

$721k
Granted FY2020
10
Grants FY2020
4
States reached
$450k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

63% of Foundation of the Heart’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Triangle Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

01What you fund
01FY2020 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $219k
  • $250k+1 grant · $450k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRIANGLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$450,000
OAKLEY INTEGRATIVE DEVELOPMENT$119,000
EXPONENTIAL IMPACT$100,000
US OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC MUSEUM$20,000
PARENTS CHALLENGE$10,000
KINGDOM FOUNDATION$10,000
ENGINEERING MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL$4,000
FORGE EVOLUTION$2,500
CULTURAL OFFICE F THE PIKE PEAK REGION$2,500
PIKES PEAK UNITED WAY$2,500
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 17% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OAKLEY INTEGRATIVE DEVELOPMENT: $119k → 14%TRIANGLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $450k → 11%KINGDOM FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%EXPONENTIAL IMPACT: $100k → 9%US OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC MUSEUM: $20k → 9%ENGINEERING MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 9%PIKES PEAK UNITED WAY: $3k → 9%FORGE EVOLUTION: $3k → 9%PARENTS CHALLENGE: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
2
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
3
Partners for Youth Opportunity

Partners for Youth Opportunity (PYO) disrupts systemic inequality by partnering with Durham youth to access the educational, economic, and social assets they need to experience a self-determined and sustainable life.

4
E3 Education Excellence & Equity

E3 transforms educational equity by reframing excellence. through training, coaching, and specialized tools, e3 supports educators to embrace the diverse lived experiences of all students and supports students in actualizing their…

Crime & Legal
5
The Verge Entrepreneurship Hub Foundation
Community Improvement
6
Utah's Promise

Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.

Philanthropy
7
Endeavor Colorado

Endeavor colorado is a not-for-profit leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in colorado to catalyze long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in our region. high-impact…

Community Improvement
8
Pikes Peak School of Expeditionary Learning

Provide education for students in Pre-K through 8th grade, benefitting approximately 415 students.

Education
9
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

10
Ten Talents Global Initiatives
Human Services
11
Endeavor Global Inc (F/K/a the Endeavor Initiative Inc)

Endeavor is leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement around the world.

International
12
Exalt Youth

Exalt youth serves youth involved in the criminal justice system, moving them away from incarceration towards re-engagement with education and meaningful job opportunities. our students come from some of the most economically depressed…

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parents Challenge and the most unlike its peers is Kingdom Foundations. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRIANGLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $450,000 · PhilanthropyTRIANGLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC+1 more — $2,500 · PhilanthropyOAKLEY INTEGRATIVE DEVELOPMENT — $119,000 · OtherOAKLEY INTEGRATIVE…Exponential Impact — $100,000 · Community ImprovementExponential Imp…United States Olympic and Paralympic Museum — $20,000 · Arts & CultureCULTURAL OFFICE OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION — $2,500 · Arts & CultureKINGDOM FOUNDATIONS — $10,000 · ReligionPARENTS CHALLENGE — $10,000 · EducationENGINEERING MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL USA — $4,000 · Science & TechForge Evolution — $2,500 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$452,500Other$119,000Community Improvement$100,000Arts & Culture$22,500Religion$10,000Education$10,000Science & Tech$4,000Crime & Legal$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRIANGLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $450,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetExponential Impact — $100,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetUnited States Olympic and Paralympic Museum — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKINGDOM FOUNDATIONS — $10,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetPARENTS CHALLENGE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetENGINEERING MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL USA — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetForge Evolution — $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCULTURAL OFFICE OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPIKES PEAK UNITED WAY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Joseph Henry Edmondson FoundationCO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Adolph Coors Foundation · T Rowe Price Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Foundation of the Heart funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Foundation of the Heart?

    Find your warmest path to Foundation of the Heart through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph