· Public charity
United Hospital Fund of New York
Working to build an effective and equitable health care system for every new yorker.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREATER NEW YORK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $125,000 |
| THE HEBREW HOME FOR THE AGED AT RIVERDALE | $20,000 |
| MARY MANNING WALSH NURSING HOME | $20,000 |
| NEW YORK CITY HEALTH & HOSPITALS CORPORATION | $20,000 |
| JEWISH HOME LIFECARE MANHATTAN | $20,000 |
| JAMAICA HOSPITAL NURSING HOME | $20,000 |
| WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $175k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCOMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK2× · 2023–2024 · $175k · revenue +47%
- JHJAMAICA HOSPITAL NURSING HOME COMPANY INC4× · 2021–2025 · $150k · revenue +19%
- TRTHE ROSALIND AND JOSEPH GURWIN JEWISH GERIATRIC CENTER OF LONG ISLAND INC3× · 2021–2023 · $130k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- SPSUNSET PARK HEALTH COUNCIL INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +32%
- FNFERNCLIFF NURSING HOME COMPANY INCone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +6%
- TSTHE SCHULMAN AND SCHACHNE INSTITUTE FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +42%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Central suffolk hospital ("csh") d/b/a peconic bay medical center ("pbmc") is a not-for-profit hospital consisting of acute health care, a skilled nursing facility and a certified home care agency. csh provides a full range of health care…
We, st. joseph's medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's medical is a member of st. joseph's health and trinity health.
Mission: to heal, to teach, to discover and to advance the health of the communities we serve. values: humanity, innovation, teamwork, diversity and equity - our values define our philosophy of care. they shape our actions and motivate and…
Lenox hill hospital medical, pc is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…
Glen cove hospital is part of northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality geriatric care; educating the current and future…
Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…
Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…
The board adopted mission statement is: nyu langone hospitals (the "hospital") will operate with new york university's medical schools a health system ("nyu langone health") devoted to excellence in patient care, education and research. in…
One brooklyn health system, inc. provides greater access to high quality medical care and keeps our communities healthy through an integrated care system that respects the diversity of our communities and addresses both the health needs…
We, st. joseph's physician health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Home Lifecare Manhattan and the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 54 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER NEW YORK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds JAMAICA HOSPITAL NURSING HOME COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROSALIND AND JOSEPH GURWIN JEWISH GERIATRIC CENTER OF LONG ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIANQUEENS ↗
- Who funds The New York and Presbyterian Hospital ↗
- Who funds LONG ISLAND JEWISH MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds EPISCOPAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BronxCare Health Systems ↗
- Who funds The Hebrew Home for Aged at Riverdale ↗
- Who funds SUNSET PARK HEALTH COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds MARY MANNING WALSH NURSING HOME CO INC ↗
- Who funds EGER HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HOME LIFECARE MANHATTAN ↗
- Who funds FERNCLIFF NURSING HOME COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds THE SCHULMAN AND SCHACHNE INSTITUTE FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HOME LIFECARE SARAH NEUMAN CENTER WESTCHESTER ↗
- Who funds PARKER JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION ↗
- Who funds THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds TERENCE CARDINAL COOKE HEALTH CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds COBBLE HILL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Foundation for Long Term Care Inc · New York Metropolitan Reference and Research Library Agency · The Fan Fox and Leslie R Samuels Foundation Inc · New York State Health Fdn D/B/A New York Health Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Hospital Fund of New York funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.