Skip to content

· Public charity

Forvis Mazars Foundation

To help the communities we serve unlock their full potential.

$2.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
182
Grants FY2025still arriving
28
States reached
$115k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$1.8MFood & Nutrition$851kYouth Development$804kEducation$795kPublic Safety & Disaster$726kPhilanthropy$649kHuman Services$383kRecreation & Sports$307kOther$0
02FY2025 · 182 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 182 grants below total $2,287,502, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,825,411 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $537,909 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k96 grants · $567k
  • $10k–50k79 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $510k
$9,104
Median grant
28
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Samaritan's Purse$115,000
The First Tee of Greater Dallas$100,000
American Heart Association$85,230
Freedom Communities$60,000
Atrium Health Foundation$50,000
Riley Children's Foundation$50,000
Citizens Memorial Hospital Foundation$50,000
Asheville Buncombe Community Christian Ministry$45,000
Springfield Little Theatre$35,000
University of Kansas Health System$32,410
Missouri Primary Care Association$30,000
The Harvest Center of Charlotte$30,000
St Louis Sports Foundation$29,972
Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc$26,400
Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $637k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Light of Life Ministries Inc: $15k → 11%Visions: $8k → 17%Center for Transforming Lives: $10k → 11%Least of These Inc: $33k → 8%Make-A-Wish Missouri & Kansas: $10k → 11%CHANCES of Stone County: $12k → 13%Respect Team: $10k → 12%American Red Cross: $9k → 15%OneSource: $10k → 16%Turning Pointe Autism Foundation: $10k → 7%Rotary District 6820 Foundation: $8k → 11%Multicultural Refugee Coalition: $10k → 10%Hope Farm Inc: $10k → 11%Least of These: $9k → 8%Middleton Outreach Ministry Inc: $7k → 10%Cheyenne Village: $7k → 9%Ozanam Family Shelter: $8k → 15%Turning Pointe Autism Foundation: $6k → 7%Miracle League of Moon Township: $15k → 11%Hope Farm Inc: $6k → 11%American Red Cross: $13k → 12%Gift of Adoption: $10k → 14%American Red Cross: $11k → 15%Hope Vibes: $8k → 10%Outreach Inc: $8k → 16%FosterAdopt Connect SWMO: $15k → 15%The Buddy Fund: $9k → 21%Braveworks: $10k → 10%Midwest Food Bank: $33k → 16%Blessings in a Backpack: $19k → 15%American Red Cross: $18k → 16%Outreach Inc: $7k → 16%Envision: $15k → 16%Midwest Food Bank: $10k → 16%Wichita Children's Home: $8k → 16%Collaborative for Children: $10k → 16%Envision: $13k → 16%Care to Learn: $21k → 15%The Center for Pursuit: $10k → 16%Harmony House: $18k → 15%The Family Place: $8k → 14%Girls on the Run of Kansas City: $8k → 15%Think Big Foundation: $11k → 15%Catholic Charities of Southern Missouri: $10k → 15%Kids Meals Inc: $10k → 16%Villages of Indiana: $20k → 16%Villages of Indiana: $10k → 16%Villages of Indiana: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 82 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

82 repeat relationships: 58 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 122 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

82
104

Total granted

$4.2M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+8%

Still filing today

100%
96%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • James Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association
    5× · 2021–2025 · $298k · revenue +49%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $219k · revenue +33%
  • TK
    The Kansas University Endowment Association
    3× · 2023–2025 · $133k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF COLLIER AND THE KEYS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +113%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -9%
  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +93%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
3
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
5
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
6
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
7
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy
8
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
10
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
11
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
12
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Missouri and Kansas; the most unlike its peers is Bernice Holland Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

301 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 301 of the 313 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
60
Early backer (in before they grew)
300/301
Grantees still filing
161/301
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF COLLIER AND THE KEYS INC: $500,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF COLLIER…James Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association: $298,250 · PhilanthropyJames Whitcomb Riley …UNITED WAY OF THE OZARKS INC: $105,528 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE OZA…UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN KENTUCKY INC: $75,980 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SOUTHER…+19 more: $336,975 · Philanthropy+19 moreUnited Way of Greater Kansas City Inc: $122,450 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $118,153 · Other500 Festival Foundation Inc: $87,500 · OtherREGIONAL BUSINESS COUNCIL: $94,000 · OtherSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $115,000 · OtherCENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INC: $100,000 · Other+76 more: $1,764,154 · Other+76 moreNORTH TEXAS JR GOLF AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $270,000 · EducationNORTH TEXAS JR G…UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $242,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NE…The Kansas University Endowment Association: $132,620 · EducationThe Kansas Unive…Indiana University Foundation: $116,562 · EducationIndiana Universi…+15 more: $258,990 · Education+15 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc: $218,850 · HealthAmerican Hea…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC: $89,680 · HealthRONALD MCDON…ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 · HealthARTHRITIS FO…BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $61,700 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH…ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthATRIUM HEALT…EASTERSEALS ARKANSAS: $48,190 · HealthEASTERSEALS …+16 more: $230,438 · Health+16 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $80,500 · Human ServicesAmerican N…MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP: $42,140 · Human ServicesMIDWEST FO…LEAST OF THESE INC: $41,868 · Human ServicesLEAST OF T…The Villages of Indiana Inc: $40,000 · Human ServicesThe Villag…Collaborative for Children: $35,000 · Human ServicesCollaborat…KIDS' MEALS INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesKIDS' MEAL…TURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION: $28,850 · Human ServicesENVISION INC: $27,521 · Human ServicesHOPE FARM INC: $27,100 · Human Services+22 more: $297,124 · Human Services+22 moreCare and Share Inc: $55,000 · Food & NutritionOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC: $45,280 · Food & NutritionNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $42,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $40,000 · Food & NutritionARKANSAS FOODBANK: $37,800 · Food & NutritionThe Harvest Center of Charlotte Inc: $30,000 · Food & NutritionHOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF IOWA: $23,575 · Food & NutritionFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $22,500 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $20,000 · Food & NutritionSPRINGFIELD COMMUNITY GARDENS: $15,000 · Food & NutritionPOTLUCK INC: $13,875 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $20,100 · Food & NutritionHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsGREATER KANSAS CITY SPORTS FOUNDATION: $74,242 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $39,500 · Recreation & SportsST LOUIS SPORTS FOUNDATION INC: $29,972 · Recreation & SportsDEKALB COMMUNITY IMPACT CORPORATION: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsLAKE COUNTRY SOCCER INC: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsCHAMPIONS4KIDS INC: $16,000 · Recreation & SportsFIRST SERVE OKC FOUNDATION: $13,500 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$1,316,733Other$2,401,257Education$1,020,672Health$778,858Human Services$655,103Food & Nutrition$395,130Recreation & Sports$328,214

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF COLLIER AND THE KEYS INC: $500,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetJames Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association: $298,250 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH TEXAS JR GOLF AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $270,000 over 4y, 9.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $242,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $218,850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $132,620 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Kansas City Inc: $122,450 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $118,153 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $116,562 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE OZARKS INC: $105,528 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INC: $100,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetREGIONAL BUSINESS COUNCIL: $94,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC: $89,680 over 4y, 1.1% of budget500 Festival Foundation Inc: $87,500 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $80,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc: $76,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN KENTUCKY INC: $75,980 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARKANSAS INC: $74,352 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetGREATER KANSAS CITY SPORTS FOUNDATION: $74,242 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS CLUB OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $72,450 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $61,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPrevent Blindness Texas: $59,175 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $57,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF DALLAS INC: $57,240 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCare and Share Inc: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERSEALS ARKANSAS: $48,190 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC: $45,280 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP: $42,140 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $42,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEAST OF THESE INC: $41,868 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Villages of Indiana Inc: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $39,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetARKANSAS FOODBANK: $37,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $36,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCollaborative for Children: $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSPRINGFIELD LITTLE THEATRE INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKIDS' MEALS INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $31,429 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SPRINGFIELD ART MUSEUM INC: $30,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arvest FoundationAR45.9× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arvest Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Musgrave Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Mercy Health Springfield Communities · The Turner Family Foundation · Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Bnsf Railway Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Forvis Mazars Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Forvis Mazars Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: 8% of income from government
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Girls On the Run Greater Boston: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
75report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Forvis Mazars Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Forvis Mazars Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 313 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Forvis Mazars’ filings →

More from the funding graph