Skip to content

· Private foundation

Foren Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$400k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$73k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Animals$886kEducation$777kHealth$287kReligion$249kHuman Services$248kYouth Development$81kArts & Culture$67kPhilanthropy$56kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $242k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $73k
$6,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARINE MAMMAL CENTER$73,000
ELEPHANT SANCTUARY OF TENNESSEE$35,000
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$32,500
HOPE ON THE BEACH$30,000
MACOMB MACOMB COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN$25,000
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY$25,000
HONORING THE SACRIFICE$24,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$15,000
GENESEE COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,500
PATHWAYS INC$10,000
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRMINGHAM$10,000
YWCA OF CENTRAL ALABAMA$8,000
CLEVELAND KOREAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$7,500
GARRETS PLACE LIFE SKILLS CENTER FOR AUTISM$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $5k → 8%NEW ALBANY WOMEN'S NETWORK INC: $5k → 15%ADOPTION NETWORK CLEVELAND: $2k → 17%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $4k → 8%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $3k → 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $4k → 8%PATHWAYS INC: $12k → 16%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $4k → 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $3k → 8%PATHWAYS INC: $12k → 16%PATHWAYS INC: $10k → 16%PATHWAYS INC: $10k → 16%PATHWAYS INC: $10k → 16%PATHWAYS INC: $7k → 16%PATHWAYS INC: $3k → 16%CITYWIDE MENTORING: $5k → 21%CITYWIDE MENTORING: $3k → 21%CITYWIDE MENTORING: $2k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OH
CA
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 45 repeat orgs$99k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +47% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
19

Total granted

$3.0M
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+47%

Still filing today

60%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsHuman ServicesHealthPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $523k · revenue +93%
  • MC
    MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $192k · revenue +93%
  • TH
    THE HONORING THE SACRIFICE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $160k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • CC
    CLASSICAL CHRISTIAN EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $26k
  • UO
    University of Michigangraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +195%
  • AS
    AUTISM SUPPORT GROUP OF GENESSEE COUNTY
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Anti-Cruelty Society

To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.

Animals
2
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
3
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
4
Animal Welfare Institute

Since 1951, the animal welfare institute has been dedicated to alleviating animal suffering caused by people. we seek to improve the welfare of animals everywhere: in agriculture, in commerce, in our homes and communities, in research, and…

Animals
5
Michigan Animal Health Foundation

To provide financial assistance to individuals and institutions for educational and scientific purposes in order to advance science to benefit the health and welfare of animals.

Animals
6
Michigan Animal Rescue League

The mission of the michigan animal rescue league is to provide the highest quality of life to dogs and cats through rescue, medical care, socialization and behavioral support, short- and long-term sanctuary, adoption, and community…

Animals
7
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
8
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
9
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
10
Friends of Detroit Animal Care and Control

Friends of the detroit animal care and control is committed to ensuring equal access to companion animals for those of all socioeconomic levels and raising the care for animals living in detroit.

Animals
11
Spokanimal Care

Spokanimal leads communities in humane/proactive ways to promote and preserve the human-companion animal bond.

Animals
12
Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Judicial Watch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Citywide Mentoring. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
34/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ELEPHANT SANCTUARY OF TENNESSEE: $285,000 · OtherELEPHANT SANCTUARY OF TENNESSEEHOPE ON THE BEACH: $200,000 · OtherHOPE ON THE BEACHWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $191,500 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN: $181,625 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORNST JUDE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $154,000 · OtherST JUDE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITALTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRMINGHAM: $66,250 · OtherWIGS FOR KIDS: $58,700 · OtherYWCA OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $57,000 · Other+26 more: $341,398 · Other+26 moreTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $523,000 · AnimalsTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTERALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC: $98,000 · AnimalsALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INCTail Waggers 1990: $40,500 · AnimalsTail Waggers 1990+5 more: $45,900 · Animals+5 moreMACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $191,500 · EducationMACOMB COMMUNITY …GENESEE COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $77,347 · EducationGENESEE COUNTY ED…KENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $71,600 · EducationKENT STATE UNIVER…OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $54,311 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVER…HENRY FORD COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $35,000 · EducationHENRY FORD COLLEG…EWHA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONINC: $25,000 · EducationDETROIT ATHLETIC CLUB FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Education+3 more: $16,000 · EducationTHE HONORING THE SACRIFICE FOUNDATION: $160,000 · Public Benefit+2 more: $7,000 · Public BenefitPATHWAYS INC: $63,250 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $11,500 · Human ServicesPaws With A Cause: $10,500 · Human ServicesCITYWIDE MENTORING: $10,000 · Human ServicesNEW ALBANY WOMENS NETWORK INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesGarretts Place Life Skills Center for Autism: $71,119 · Health+2 more: $3,000 · HealthSOCIETY FOR THE RE-INSITUTIONALIZAT: $40,000 · Arts & CultureBrooklyn Poets Inc: $28,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,535,473Animals$707,400Education$495,758Public Benefit$167,000Human Services$102,250Health$74,119Arts & Culture$68,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $523,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetMACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $191,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetTHE HONORING THE SACRIFICE FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 8y, 24% of budgetALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC: $98,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetGENESEE COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $77,347 over 7y, 78% of budgetKENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $71,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGarretts Place Life Skills Center for Autism: $71,119 over 8y, 23% of budgetPATHWAYS INC: $63,250 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $54,311 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTail Waggers 1990: $40,500 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE RE-INSITUTIONALIZAT: $40,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR EWHA WOMANS UNIVERSITY INC: $36,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetHENRY FORD COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LINK OF CULLMAN COUNTY INC: $34,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetBrooklyn Poets Inc: $28,000 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetEWHA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONINC: $25,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetDETROIT ATHLETIC CLUB FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetOHIO WILDLIFE CENTER: $22,400 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTheta Tau Educational Foundation: $19,000 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetSmokey Acres: $15,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetHOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $11,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of the Sleeping Bear Dunes: $11,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetPaws With A Cause: $10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $9,875 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND BOTANICAL GARDEN: $8,095 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW ALBANY WOMENS NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetDETROIT HORSE POWER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFERAL KITTY TRAPPERS TRN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADOPTION NETWORK CLEVELAND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetK9S UNITED INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSpanish American Committee: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HONORING THE SACRIFICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds GENESEE COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Garretts Place Life Skills Center for Autism ↗
  • Who funds PATHWAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Tail Waggers 1990 ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE RE-INSITUTIONALIZAT ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR EWHA WOMANS UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LINK OF CULLMAN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Brooklyn Poets Inc ↗
  • Who funds EWHA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT ATHLETIC CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OHIO WILDLIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Theta Tau Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Smokey Acres ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Sleeping Bear Dunes ↗
  • Who funds Paws With A Cause ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hough FoundationMI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hough Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foren Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foren Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Foren Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Foren Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Foren Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph