· Private foundation
Fore River Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k47 grants · $114k
- $10k–50k34 grants · $654k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $881k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Trust for Public Lands | $128,000 |
| Brennan Center for Justice | $125,000 |
| Earthjustice | $120,000 |
| Center for Science in the Public Inter | $100,000 |
| Maine Family Planning | $100,000 |
| Center for Reproductive Rights | $77,000 |
| Land and Garden Preserve | $65,000 |
| Maine Coast Heritage Trust | $61,000 |
| University of Maine | $55,000 |
| News Literacy Project | $50,000 |
| Guttmacher Institute | $43,000 |
| Constitutional Accountability Center | $40,000 |
| Friends of Acadia | $36,000 |
| St Timothy's School | $35,000 |
| Benton Falls Church | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $270k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
131 repeat relationships — 73 still active in FY2025, 58 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $153k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND8× · 2018–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +119%
EARTHJUSTICE8× · 2018–2025 · $705k · revenue +114%- FOFriends of Acadia8× · 2017–2025 · $684k · revenue +98%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of Virginiaone grant, 2023 · $100k
- HHHELPING HANDS OF ROUND PONDone grant, 2024 · $60k · 30% of their budget
- SHSOUTHWEST HARBOR HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue +104%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
The mission of Islesboro Islands Trust is to enhance the quality of residents' lives through the preservation of open space, educate all residents as to the value of the island's natural ecosystems, and act as an environmental advocate on…
The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.
Maine Farmland Trust protects farmland, supports farmers, and advances the future of farming.
Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The institutes mission is to cultivate a responsibility for the natural environment and our human communities through interdisciplinary science education.
Preserve ri's vision is a future where historic preservation creates positive change, making our diverse cultures, the environment, and the economy better for the people who live, visit and work in rhode island. preserve ri's mission is to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Jackson Hole and the most unlike its peers is Portland Esl Scholarship Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
139 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 139 of the 228 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
- Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
- Who funds Friends of Acadia ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds Maine Coast Heritage Trust ↗
- Who funds Mount Desert Land and Garden Preserve ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION OF ST TIMOTHY'S SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds Guttmacher Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds PULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING ↗
- Who funds ORDWAY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF SOUTHBOROUGH INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds SEEDS OF PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds GROWSMART MAINE ↗
- Who funds NATUREBRIDGE ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY ↗
- Who funds THE HOLTON ARMS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SHE SHOULD RUN ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
- Who funds STATE INNOVATION EXCHANGE ↗
- Who funds BAR HARBOR HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds HELPING HANDS OF ROUND POND ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST HARBOR HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Colket Family Foundation · Ethel D Colket Foundation · Davis Family Foundation · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Hattie a and Fred C Lynam Trust · Gerrish H Milliken Foundation 009209-009 · The Widgeon Point Charitable Foundation · Morton-Kelly Charitable Trust · Horizon Foundation Inc · Stephen & Tabitha King Foundation Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fore River Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of South Florida and the Treasure Coast Inc — 6% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Martin County — 2% of income from government
- Grub Street Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
- The Banner Lake Club Inc — 1% of income from government
- Proprietors of the Boston Athenaeum — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fore River Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Fore River Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.