Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Food Allergy Research & Education Inc

Fare's mission is to improve the quality of life and health of those with food allergies through transformative research, education and advocacy.

$3.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$34MScience & Tech$824kEducation$531kFood & Nutrition$399kArts & Culture$175k
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 21 grants below total $3,409,650 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,840,896 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $431,246 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $116k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $953k
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.3M
$76,994
Median grant
14
States reached
$33M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$1,105,330
THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$506,115
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER$457,413
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA$266,667
TOP BOX FOODS$146,042
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$123,980
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$100,000
SAG-AFTRA FOUNDATION$100,000
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY$100,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$100,000
THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA$76,994
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$55,500
ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER$50,000
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 49% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%THE BROAD INSTITUTE: $5.0M → 8%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORP (DBA BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSP) (FIEBIGER): $150k → 16%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $671k → 7%BECKMAN COULTER INC: $743k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $100k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $100k → 14%University of Wisconsin - Madison: $105k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $267k → 13%Emory University: $105k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $457k → 16%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $1.2M → 14%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $200k → 19%THE BROAD INSTITUTE: $5.0M → 8%THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $650k → 22%THE LEYLAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $450k → 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $120k → 8%BECKMAN COULTER INC: $207k → 10%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $100k → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $100k → 13%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $451k → 16%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $1.1M → 14%JOHNS HOPKINS: $100k → 19%FOOD ALLERGY SCIENCE INITIATIVE: $5.0M → 8%THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $506k → 22%THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $100k → 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $120k → 8%THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $100k → 14%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $100k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $421k → 16%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 14%THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $479k → 22%THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $100k → 7%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $143k → 17%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $100k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 14%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $124k → 17%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $829k → 14%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $120k → 17%SAG-AFTRA FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%ICAHN MOUNT SINAI: $100k → 17%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $450k → 16%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $100k → 17%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $300k → 16%THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $200k → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $100k → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $100k → 14%TOP BOX FOODS: $146k → 14%TOP BOX FOODS SUPPORT OF THE SEED STUDY: $93k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $399k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$253k · 63% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: MEDICAL RESEARCH

East Asia and the Pacific$146k · 37% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: MEDICAL RESEARCH

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$32M · 37 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

37 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
22

Total granted

$32M
$970k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+17%

Still filing today

57%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationScience & TechRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    The Broad Institute Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $15M · revenue +44%
  • Northwestern University
    6× · 2019–2024 · $5.2M · revenue +34%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    6× · 2017–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • NATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $155k · revenue -76%
  • UO
    University of Wisconsin Madison
    one grant, 2019 · $105k
  • NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $90k · revenue +50%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
2
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
3
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
6
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
7
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
8
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
9
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
10
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
11
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
12
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Abrahams Tent Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Food Banks and PantriesChristian Missionary Organi…Health Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%32%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%53%10–20yr16%5%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr16%34%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/66
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,499

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
33/39
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Broad Institute Inc — $15,000,000 · HealthThe Broad Institute IncTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $1,855,812 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIACHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $1,497,582 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER+13 more — $1,500,495 · Health+13 moreMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $1,053,833 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIG…BECKMAN COULTER INC — $949,700 · OtherBECKMAN COULTER I…UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $533,889 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NOR…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $387,500 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UN…RECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA — $321,416 · OtherRECTOR & VISITORS…ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $307,473 · OtherARKANSAS CHILDREN…LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $240,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA — $233,333 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $224,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE — $206,111 · Other+24 more — $1,154,671 · Other+24 moreNorthwestern University — $5,192,901 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern Uni…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $1,452,473 · EducationTHE BOARD OF …Yale University — $770,000 · EducationYale Universi…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $728,953 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL …University of Chicago — $575,967 · EducationUniversity of…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $369,892 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS…UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $175,000 · EducationEmory University — $148,022 · Education+5 more — $142,817 · EducationTOP BOX FOODS — $267,553 · Food & NutritionSCREEN ACTORS GUILD-AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TELEVISION AND RADIO ARTISTS — $175,000 · EmploymentGORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES INC — $70,000 · Science & Tech
Health$19,853,889Other$5,611,926Recreation & Sports$5,192,901Education$4,363,124Food & Nutrition$267,553Employment$175,000Science & Tech$70,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Broad Institute Inc — $15,000,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetNorthwestern University — $5,192,901 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $1,855,812 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $1,497,582 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $1,452,473 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYale University — $770,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $728,953 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $575,967 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $379,285 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $369,892 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARKANSAS CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $307,473 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTOP BOX FOODS — $267,553 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center — $261,175 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $175,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSCREEN ACTORS GUILD-AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TELEVISION AND RADIO ARTISTS — $175,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS INC — $154,635 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEmory University — $148,022 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBENAROYA RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT VIRGINIA — $130,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $120,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S NATIONAL — $105,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $90,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $87,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDell Children's Medical Group — $87,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetASSOCIATED SCIENTISTS TO HELP MINIMIZE ALLERGIES — $82,371 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES INC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD ALLERGY ORGANIZATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS — $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH WARD ALLIANCE — $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetABRAHAMS TENT INC — $20,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetNew York University — $16,817 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST NORBERT COLLEGE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIVERSIFY DIETETICS INC — $6,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH — $5,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Broad Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds TOP BOX FOODS ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds SCREEN ACTORS GUILD-AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TELEVISION AND RADIO ARTISTS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS INC ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds BENAROYA RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S NATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds Dell Children's Medical Group ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATED SCIENTISTS TO HELP MINIMIZE ALLERGIES ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds ASCENSION SETON ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Johns Hopkins Univers…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Johns Hopkins UniversityMD12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Johns Hopkins University · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Food Allergy Research & Education Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • South Ward Alliance — 57% of income from government
  • The Broad Institute Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines