Skip to content

· Private foundation

Focus for Health Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
134
Grants FY2024still arriving
23
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.5MCrime & Legal$2.1MHuman Services$1.7MCivil Rights$1.5MYouth Development$972kEducation$570kCommunity Improvement$495kReligion$447kOther$0
02FY2024 · 134 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k109 grants · $2.5M
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $1.1M
$25,000
Median grant
23
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FREEDOM RISING$95,000
Individual grant recipient$80,000
UNCHAINED AT LAST$60,000
VILLAGE OF WISDOM$60,000
CHAINLESS CHANGE$60,000
NO MO$55,000
BLACK AND MISSING FOUNDATION$50,000
ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES FOR JUSTICE$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
3D GIRLS INC$50,000
THE CONFESS PROJECT$50,000
EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION$50,000
BLACK WOMEN'S BLUEPRINT INC$50,000
SMALL TALK CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$50,000
BLACK GIRLS SMILE$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%A BREEZE OF HOPE: $30k → 10%COLUMBIA COUNTY SANCTUARY MOVEMENT: $35k → 11%ROSA ES ROJO: $35k → 8%REBALANCED LIFE WELLNESS ASSOCIATION: $41k → 10%SAFE HARBOR CHILD ACCESS CENTERS: $28k → 4%YOU ARE MORE THAN INC: $21k → 7%BLACK FEM: $41k → 15%A BREEZE OF HOPE: $25k → 10%COLUMBIA COUNTY SANCTUARY MOVEMENT: $25k → 11%ROSA ES ROJO: $31k → 8%REBALANCED LIFE WELLNESS ASSOCIATION: $40k → 10%SAFE HARBOR CHILD ACCESS CENTERS: $20k → 4%YOU ARE MORE THAN INC: $20k → 7%CREDIT DO: $20k → 16%BLACKFEM INC: $31k → 15%TEEN HEALTH MISSISSIPPI: $22k → 23%SAFE HARBOR CHILD ACCESS CENTERS: $20k → 4%BLACKFEM INC: $25k → 15%SERVICE WOMEN'S ACTION NETWORK: $23k → 14%UNCHAINED AT LAST: $61k → 10%BLACKFEM INC: $20k → 15%SERVICE WOMEN'S ACTION NETWORK: $20k → 14%UNCHAINED AT LAST: $60k → 10%UNCHAINED AT LAST: $40k → 10%FATHERS UPLIFT INC: $51k → 16%EQUITY BEFORE BIRTH: $25k → 11%UNCHAINED AT LAST: $25k → 10%FATHERS UPLIFT INC: $40k → 16%STEP UP DURHAM: $30k → 11%UNCHAINED AT LAST: $20k → 10%FATHERS UPLIFT INC: $35k → 16%SMALL TALK CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $51k → 16%STEP UP DURHAM: $30k → 11%FATHERS UPLIFT INC: $25k → 16%MIDDLE PROJECT INC: $111k → 17%SMALL TALK CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $50k → 16%FREEDOM RISING: $95k → 17%EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $50k → 14%MIDDLE PROJECT INC: $90k → 17%EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $50k → 14%MIDDLE PROJECT INC: $75k → 17%MIDDLE PROJECT INC: $55k → 17%MIDDLE PROJECT INC: $25k → 17%MIDDLE PROJECT INC: $25k → 17%EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $25k → 14%MIDDLE PROJECT INC: $20k → 17%EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $25k → 14%EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 158 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

158 repeat relationships: 93 still active in FY2024, 65 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

158
65

Total granted

$13M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+12%

Still filing today

57%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $726k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalEducationCivil RightsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MIDDLE PROJECT INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $526k · revenue +227% · 74% of their budget
  • Village Of Wisdom
    5× · 2020–2024 · $271k · revenue +135%
  • LE
    L&J EMPOWERMENT INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $271k · revenue +234%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE
    one grant, 2019 · $145k
  • IF
    INBAR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $60k
  • NV
    NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Network Advocating Against Domestic Violence

The Network is a group of 40+ member organizations dedicated to improving the lives of those impacted by gender-based violence through education, public policy and advocacy, and connecting community members with direct service providers.…

Human Services
2
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
3
Justice Funders

Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.

—
4
Colorofchangeorg

Colorofchange.org works to strengthen the voice of black americans and increase the level of accountability and responsiveness of elected officials to underrepresented black constituencies using the internet as a lobbying and…

—
5
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
6
National Black Womens Justice Institite Inc
—
7
Life After Justice

Life After Justice (LAJ) fights to free the wrongfully convicted and provides support in reclaiming their lives after justice. Created by exonerees, the majority exoneree-led Board of Directors' approach is rooted in the knowledge,…

Crime & Legal
8
Justice Innovation Inc

The center for justice innovation is a non-profit organization that works to create a fair, effective, and humane justice system and build strong, thriving communities.

Crime & Legal
9
Black Alliance for Just Immigration

The organization provides public education on the issues related to fair and just immigration policies.

Arts & Culture
10
Center for Intimacy Justice

Center for Intimacy Justice (CIJ) works to create equity and wellbeing in people's intimate lives. CIJ's first program is changing Big Tech platforms discriminatory suppression of womens sexual and reproductive health information online.

Civil Rights
11
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
12
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Black Girls Smile Inc; the most unlike its peers is Reign 4 Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

143 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 143 of the 265 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
36
Early backer (in before they grew)
136/143
Grantees still filing
89/143
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $295,500 · Other+120 more: $6,953,695 · Other+120 moreTHE MIDDLE PROJECT INC: $525,800 · Human ServicesTHE MIDDLE PROJEC…UNCHAINED AT LAST INC: $245,500 · Human ServicesUNCHAINED AT LAST…FATHERS UPLIFT INCORPORATED: $200,500 · Human ServicesFATHERS UPLIFT IN…EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $175,000 · Human ServicesEQUITY AND TRANSF…SMALL TALK CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $132,500 · Human ServicesSMALL TALK CHILDR…Blackfem Inc: $116,000 · Human ServicesHARBOR OF HOPE A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $109,500 · Human ServicesRebalanced Life Wellness Association Inc: $100,500 · Human ServicesSTEPUP DURHAM: $85,000 · Human ServicesROSA ES ROJO INC: $80,500 · Human ServicesSERVICE WOMENS ACTION NETWORK: $77,500 · Human Services+11 more: $393,200 · Human Services+11 moreELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $200,000 · HealthELS FOR AUTI…ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH USA: $187,553 · HealthALLIANCE FOR…Firecracker Foundation: $148,000 · HealthFirecracker …MUTERA GLOBAL HEALING INC: $130,500 · HealthMUTERA GLOBA…NATIONAL HEALTH FREEDOM COALITION: $130,000 · HealthNATIONAL HEA…AKHIL AUTISM FOUNDATION: $113,750 · HealthAKHIL AUTISM…BLACK GIRLS SMILE INC: $110,500 · HealthBLACK GIRLS …MAMA BEAR EFFECT INC: $95,500 · HealthMAMA BEAR EF…BLACK MEN HEAL: $95,500 · HealthBLACK MEN HE…BEYOND CELIAC: $77,500 · HealthDAIR FOUNDATION: $66,000 · HealthSURVIVORS NETWORK OF THOSE ABUSED BY PRIESTS: $60,000 · Health+7 more: $170,000 · Health+7 moreAlliance of Families for Justice Inc: $187,500 · Crime & LegalAlliance …CHAINLESS CHANGE INC: $140,500 · Crime & LegalCHAINLESS…GODLY RESPONSE TO ABUSE IN THE: $135,500 · Crime & LegalGODLY RES…EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW: $130,500 · Crime & LegalEQUAL JUS…Chicago Torture Justice Center: $125,000 · Crime & LegalChicago T…BLACK AND MISSING FOUNDATION: $118,500 · Crime & LegalBLACK AND…MOTHERHOOD BEYOND BARS INC: $95,500 · Crime & LegalMOTHERHOO…MEN STOPPING VIOLENCE INC: $82,300 · Crime & LegalMEN STOPP…WEST SIDE JUSTICE CENTER INC: $47,500 · Crime & Legal+6 more: $148,400 · Crime & Legal+6 moreHow Our Lives Link Altogether Inc: $275,500 · Youth DevelopmentVillage Of Wisdom: $270,500 · Youth Development3D Girls Incorporated: $129,500 · Youth DevelopmentIMPACTDMV INC: $95,500 · Youth DevelopmentCultivate Charlottesville: $65,500 · Youth DevelopmentCLOSE TIES LEADERSHIP PROGRAM: $62,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHIP INTERNATIONAL INC: $217,000 · EducationA PARTNERSHIP FOR CHANGE INC: $135,000 · EducationRISE COLORADO: $100,000 · EducationREIGN 4 LIFE: $75,500 · EducationUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $75,000 · EducationJareds Heart of Success Inc: $61,034 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $52,500 · EducationALABAMA JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $45,000 · EducationMORE THAN BOOTSTRAPS: $34,000 · Education+2 more: $45,000 · EducationL&J EMPOWERMENT INC: $270,500 · EmploymentTHE DO SCHOOL: $80,000 · EmploymentMortar Cincinnati: $76,981 · EmploymentLet's Work for Good Inc: $70,000 · EmploymentNEIGHBORHOOD LAND POWER PROJECT: $55,000 · EmploymentRENFORCE: $25,000 · Employment
Other$7,249,195Human Services$2,241,500Health$1,584,803Crime & Legal$1,211,200Youth Development$898,500Education$840,034Employment$577,481

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MIDDLE PROJECT INC: $525,800 over 6y, 74% of budgetHow Our Lives Link Altogether Inc: $275,500 over 5y, 20% of budgetVillage Of Wisdom: $270,500 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetL&J EMPOWERMENT INC: $270,500 over 5y, 8.8% of budgetUNCHAINED AT LAST INC: $245,500 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetCHIP INTERNATIONAL INC: $217,000 over 6y, 100% of budgetSACRED SPACES: $215,500 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetTHE RECONCILIATION CENTER INC: $208,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetFATHERS UPLIFT INCORPORATED: $200,500 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH USA: $187,553 over 5y, 15% of budgetAlliance of Families for Justice Inc: $187,500 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetSUSTAINABLE SOUTH BRONX INC: $180,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetEQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $175,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetFirecracker Foundation: $148,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetCHAINLESS CHANGE INC: $140,500 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetGODLY RESPONSE TO ABUSE IN THE: $135,500 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetA PARTNERSHIP FOR CHANGE INC: $135,000 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetNASSANS PLACE: $134,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetSMALL TALK CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $132,500 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW: $130,500 over 3y, 14% of budgetMUTERA GLOBAL HEALING INC: $130,500 over 3y, 100% of budgetNATIONAL HEALTH FREEDOM COALITION: $130,000 over 4y, 19% of budget3D Girls Incorporated: $129,500 over 5y, 9.2% of budgetNO-MO: $120,500 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetBLACK AND MISSING FOUNDATION: $118,500 over 3y, 8.3% of budgetBlackfem Inc: $116,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetAKHIL AUTISM FOUNDATION: $113,750 over 6y, 30% of budgetBLACK GIRLS SMILE INC: $110,500 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetJustice Committee Inc: $110,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetHARBOR OF HOPE A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $109,500 over 5y, 35% of budgetRebalanced Life Wellness Association Inc: $100,500 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetRISE COLORADO: $100,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMOTHERHOOD BEYOND BARS INC: $95,500 over 3y, 11% of budgetMAMA BEAR EFFECT INC: $95,500 over 5y, 28% of budgetIMPACTDMV INC: $95,500 over 4y, 20% of budgetBLACK MEN HEAL: $95,500 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetSTEPUP DURHAM: $85,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetMEN STOPPING VIOLENCE INC: $82,300 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetSTOP IT NOW INC: $81,300 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetROSA ES ROJO INC: $80,500 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetTHE DO SCHOOL: $80,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetSERVICE WOMENS ACTION NETWORK: $77,500 over 4y, 10% of budgetBEYOND CELIAC: $77,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMortar Cincinnati: $76,981 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetMISSISSIPPI RISING COALITION: $75,500 over 4y, 12% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 3y, 28% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MIDDLE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds How Our Lives Link Altogether Inc ↗
  • Who funds Village Of Wisdom ↗
  • Who funds L&J EMPOWERMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds UNCHAINED AT LAST INC ↗
  • Who funds CHIP INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SACRED SPACES ↗
  • Who funds THE RECONCILIATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FATHERS UPLIFT INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH USA ↗
  • Who funds Alliance of Families for Justice Inc ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE SOUTH BRONX INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION ↗
  • Who funds Firecracker Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHAINLESS CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds GODLY RESPONSE TO ABUSE IN THE ↗
  • Who funds A PARTNERSHIP FOR CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds NASSANS PLACE ↗
  • Who funds SMALL TALK CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW ↗
  • Who funds MUTERA GLOBAL HEALING INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL HEALTH FREEDOM COALITION ↗
  • Who funds 3D Girls Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Torture Justice Center ↗
  • Who funds NO-MO ↗
  • Who funds BLACK AND MISSING FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Borealis PhilanthropyMN29.3× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Borealis Philanthropy · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Tides Center · Echoing Green Inc · New Profit Inc · Public Welfare Foundation Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Proteus Fund Inc · Claneil Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Solidaire Network Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Focus for Health Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Focus for Health Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 230%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • You Are More Than Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Prevention Education Inc: 39% of income from government
  • New Jersey Chapter American Academy of Pediatrics Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Fathers Uplift Incorporated: 22% of income from government
  • More Than Bootstraps: 16% of income from government
  • United Way of Hunterdon County: 10% of income from government
  • Nassans Place: 3% of income from government
  • Chainless Change Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
23get no government money at all
32report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Focus for Health Inc?

Find your warmest path to Focus for Health Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 265 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Focus for Health’s filings →

More from the funding graph