Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fine Family Charitable Foundation Trust Dtd 32403

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
0162% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$165kEducation$69kInternational$21kArts & Culture$13kHealth$13kCommunity Improvement$7kReligion$3kPublic Benefit$3kYouth Development$3kOther$190k
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$679k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIVING WATER CHILDRENS CENTER$45,000
SAINT PETERS UNIVERSITY$10,000
THE GRADUATE CENTER$6,000
HUNTER COLLEGE$2,638
GLOBAL IMPACT$2,500
WESTSIDE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGRY$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
DANCES FOR VARIABLE POPULATION$1,000
NEW AMERICAN LEADERS$1,000
BIG APPLE GREETER$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION$1,000
PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY$1,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOUR CHILDREN INC: $1k → 13%CENTER FOR SAFETY AND CHANGE: $1k → 14%HOUR CHILDREN INC: $1k → 13%CENTER FOR SAFETY AND CHANGE: $500 → 14%CASA MYRNA VAZQUEZ: $1k → 16%CENTER FOR SAFETY AND CHANGE: $500 → 14%CASA MYRNA VAZQUEZ: $1k → 16%CENTER FOR SAFETY AND CHANGE: $500 → 14%CASA MYRNA VAZQUEZ: $1k → 16%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $200 → 9%LIVING WATER CHILDRENS CENTER: $45k → 17%LIVING WATER CHILDRENS CENTER: $30k → 17%LIVING WATER CHILDRENS CENTER: $25k → 17%LIVING WATER CHILDRENS CENTER: $23k → 17%LIVING WATER CHILDRENS CENTER: $15k → 17%LIVING WATER CHILDRENS CENTER: $10k → 17%LIVING WATER CHILDRENS CENTER: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$442k · 43 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
27

Total granted

$442k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+61%

Still filing today

53%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureInternationalHealthEnvironmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LW
    LIVING WATER CHILDREN'S CENTRE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $158k · revenue +79%
  • SP
    SAINT PETER'S UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $68k · revenue +6%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $12k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • LW
    LIVING WATER CHILREN FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • GN
    GREENBURGH NORTHCASTLE SCHOOL DISTR
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Human Rights Watch Inc

Human rights watch ("hrw") defends the rights of people worldwide. we scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. human rights watch is an independent,…

International
3
Global Poverty Project Inc

Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.

Social Science
4
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
5
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
6
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
7
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
8
Fos Feminista Fund

Fos feminista fund was formed exclusively for charitable purposes to support, foster, aid, and enhance access to contraception, responsible parenthood, reproductive health, and empowerment of women and shall aid and support the activities…

Health
9
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
10
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
11
Pact Inc

Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)

International
12
Pro Publica Inc

Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is People for the American Way and the most unlike its peers is Living Water Children's Centre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Government Accountability R…Food Pantries & AssistanceLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Land Conservation Organizat…Cancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Arts OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Native Hawaiian Community D…Professional Ballet Compani…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Pregnancy Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr19%30%20–35yr13%41%35–55yr16%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%52%10–20yr19%11%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%24%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/39
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,721

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
26/38
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE GRADUATE CENTER — $48,000 · OtherTHE GRADUATE CENTERCUNY THE GRADUATE CENTER — $20,000 · OtherCUNY THE GRADUATE CENTERLIVING WATER CHILREN FUND — $15,000 · OtherLIVING WATER CHILREN FUNDWESTSIDE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGRY — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $8,000 · OtherACLU — $7,000 · Other+45 more — $90,878 · Other+45 moreLIVING WATER CHILDREN'S CENTRE — $157,500 · Human ServicesLIVING WATER CHILDREN'S CENTRE+4 more — $7,700 · Human ServicesSAINT PETER'S UNIVERSITY — $68,000 · EducationSAINT PETER'S UN…+1 more — $1,000 · EducationMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $5,500 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $4,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $3,500 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION — $3,000 · InternationalGlobal Impact — $2,500 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · InternationalDANCES FOR A VARIABLE POPULATION INC — $7,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO — $2,500 · Arts & CultureTRUTHOUT — $2,000 · Arts & CultureARTS 10566 INC — $1,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $250 · Arts & CulturePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $12,000 · Health+2 more — $600 · HealthBIG APPLE GREETER INC — $6,000 · Community ImprovementHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $500 · Community Improvement
Other$198,878Human Services$165,200Education$69,000International$20,500Arts & Culture$12,750Health$12,600Community Improvement$6,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLIVING WATER CHILDREN'S CENTRE — $157,500 over 7y, 19% of budgetSAINT PETER'S UNIVERSITY — $68,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDANCES FOR A VARIABLE POPULATION INC — $7,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBIG APPLE GREETER INC — $6,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $5,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY — $5,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES INC — $4,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $4,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR ANTI-VIOLENCE EDUCATION INC — $3,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION INC — $3,150 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC CITIZEN INC — $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASA MYRNA VAZQUEZ INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO — $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Impact — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR SAFETY & CHANGE INC — $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUTHOUT — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOUR CHILDREN INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARTS 10566 INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEAST VILLAGE YOUTH PROGRAM — $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHONOR THE EARTH — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW AMERICAN LEADERS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTRAY FROM THE HEART INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Coalition of Immokalee Workers Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Claire Marie Foundation Inc — $300 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRed Devils Inc — $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetScenic Hudson Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOBY PROJECT INC — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUTCHESS LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIVING WATER CHILDREN'S CENTRE
  • Who funds SAINT PETER'S UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds DANCES FOR A VARIABLE POPULATION INC
  • Who funds BIG APPLE GREETER INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY
  • Who funds TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES INC
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR ANTI-VIOLENCE EDUCATION INC
  • Who funds FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PUBLIC CITIZEN INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION
  • Who funds WEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE
  • Who funds CASA MYRNA VAZQUEZ INC
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO
  • Who funds Global Impact
  • Who funds CENTER FOR SAFETY & CHANGE INC
  • Who funds TRUTHOUT
  • Who funds HOUR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Open Society InstituteNY15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Open Society Institute · The New York Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Ford Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fine Family Charitable Foundation Trust Dtd 32403 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Casa Myrna Vazquez Inc5% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc0% of income from government
  • Saint Peter's University0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fine Family Charitable Foundation Trust Dtd 32403?

Find your warmest path to Fine Family Charitable Foundation Trust Dtd 32403 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph