· Public charity
Fine Arts Foundation
To enrich life in colorado by supporting the arts.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Denver Art Musuem | $7,500 |
| University of Denver | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2020, 12 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF DENVER4× · 2017–2020 · $33k · revenue +33%
- DADENVER ART MUSEUM4× · 2017–2020 · $30k · revenue +7%
DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS3× · 2017–2019 · $11k · revenue +64%
Funded once
- RMROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INCone grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue -11%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +79%
- OCOPERA COLORADOone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Providing entertainment and education through the production of high-quality orchestral music.
The mission of the boulder philharmonic orchestra is to enrich connections and communities through the power of orchestral music. the boulder philharmonic orchestra presents performances that reflect our community's values, creativity, and…
The center for arts, a home for arts and culture, offers engaging opportunities and educational experiences to enrich and expand the life of our community.
Boulder ensemble theatre company creates powerful, engaging, top-quality performances and programs, with meaningful impacts beyond the stage. we serve and welcome colorado's many diverse communities, cultivating an inclusive environment…
Performing Symphony Concerts for the greater Aurora, Colorado Community
Charitable organization presenting musical events and educational programs. In 2023-24, Pro Musica Colorado Chamber Orchestra presented two world premieres and featured numerous works by women composers and composers of color.
Artibus is dedicated to strengthening community through the experience of live performance. We are a hub in Denver for intimate, original performances that explore important social themes and for building community through shared space,…
To inspire, enrich, and connect our community through the transformative power of live orchestral music.
The Colorado Vocal Arts Ensemble (CVAE) is a regionally acclaimed chamber choir dedicated to excellence in the choral art.
The Longmont Concert Band is a nonprofit organization composed of volunteer musicians from the surrounding community. Our goals are to provide quality concert band music to the general public, to provide a fun and invigorating atmosphere…
Advancement of music through the celebration of the legacy of the composer Gustav Mahler through an annual festival
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central City Opera House Association and the most unlike its peers is Denver Film Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds PLATTEFORUM ↗
- Who funds COLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PHAMALY THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds CURIOUS THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE DENVER BRASS INC ↗
- Who funds Arvada Center for the Arts and Humanities ↗
- Who funds Inside the Orchestra ↗
- Who funds ART STUDENTS LEAGUE OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds OPERA COLORADO ↗
- Who funds CHERRY ARTS ↗
- Who funds Young Voices of Colorado ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL CITY OPERA HOUSE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Englewood Cultural Arts Center ↗
- Who funds THE MORRISON THEATER COMPANY ↗
- Who funds DENVER YOUNG ARTISTS ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DENVER ↗
- Who funds DENVER FILM SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Cherokee Ranch & Castle ↗
- Who funds BOULDER COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds ARAPAHOE PHILHARMONIC INC ↗
- Who funds STORIES ON STAGE ↗
- Who funds Center for the Arts Evergreen Inc ↗
- Who funds PERFORMING ARTS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds CITY PARK JAZZ INC ↗
- Who funds BOULDER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO CHAMBER PLAYERS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds SU TEATRO INC ↗
- Who funds GRAND CONCERTS INC ↗
- Who funds OPERA STEAMBOAT ↗
- Who funds THE AURORA SINGERS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Bonfils-Stanton Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Burgess R & F Tuw · The Anschutz Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Hill Foundation Wells Fargo Bank Na · Zeppelin Family Foundation · Sheila Fortune Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fine Arts Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.