Skip to content
Fedoriw Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Fedoriw Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

International$322kPhilanthropy$56kReligion$22kArts & Culture$13kEducation$3kCivil Rights$2kHuman Services$800Health$790Other$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $29k
$500
Median grant
10
States reached
$811k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UKRANIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF TRANSFI$29,000
VARIOUS ORGANIZED CHARITIES$4,160
ST MICHAELS$4,000
HOLY FAMILY UKRANIAN CATHOLIC CHURC$2,500
UKRANIAN CHORUS DUMKA OF NEW YORK$2,000
THE BOWERY MISSION$1,200
UKRANIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA$1,000
UNITED UKRANIAN AMERICAN RELIEF COM$1,000
VARIOUS CHURCHES$950
GTEV SCHLIERACHTALER STAMM$575
ST VOLODYMYR CATHEDRAL$500
Individual grant recipient$500
REVIVED SOLDIERS OF UKRAINE$500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$400
ST JOSEPH INDIAN SCHOOL$350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNITED UKRANIAN AMER RELIEF COMM: $1k → 22%ST MICHAELS: $4k → 11%UKRANIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF TRANSFI: $55k → 13%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $600 → 17%UKRANIAN BANDURUST CHORUS OF NORTH: $2k → 21%EVANGELICAL CHURCH ASSEMBLY OF GOD: $1k → 9%UNITED UKRANIAN AMERICAN RELIEF COM: $1k → 22%ST MICHAELS: $2k → 11%UKRANIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF TRANSFI: $49k → 13%HOLY FAMILY UKRANIAN CATHOLIC CHURC: $3k → 14%UNITED UKRANIAN AMER RELIEF COMM: $1k → 22%GTEV SCHLIERACHTALER STAMM: $575 → 6%ST MICHAELS: $2k → 11%UKRANIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF TRANSFI: $44k → 13%ST MICHAELS: $1k → 11%UKRANIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF TRANSFI: $44k → 13%ST MICHAELS: $1k → 11%UKRANIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF TRANSFI: $38k → 13%RAZOM INC: $6k → 17%UKRANIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF TRANSFI: $36k → 13%UKRANIAN CHORUS DUMKA: $3k → 17%UKRANIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF TRANSFI: $29k → 13%UKRANIAN CHORUS DUMKA OF NEW YORK: $2k → 17%VARIOUS ORGANIZED CHARITIES: $15k → 13%UKRANIAN CONGRESS COMM OF AMERICA: $2k → 17%VARIOUS ORGANIZED CHARITIES: $12k → 13%UKRANIAN NATIONAL WOMENS LEAGUE OF: $2k → 17%VARIOUS ORGANIZED CHARITIES: $10k → 13%VARIOUS ORGANIZED CHARITIES: $6k → 13%VARIOUS ORGANIZED CHARITIES: $5k → 13%VARIOUS ORGANIZED CHARITIES: $4k → 13%ST VOLODYMYR CATHEDRAL: $1k → 17%VARIOUS ORGANIZED CHARITIES: $4k → 13%VARIOUS CHURCHES: $3k → 13%ST VOLODYMYR CATHEDRAL: $950 → 17%VARIOUS CHURCHES: $950 → 13%VARIOUS CHURCHES: $875 → 13%ST VOLODYMYR CATHEDRAL: $700 → 17%VARIOUS CHURCHES: $750 → 13%ST ANDREWS: $2k → 13%ST VOLODYMYR CATHEDRAL: $650 → 17%ST VOLODYMYR CATHEDRAL: $600 → 17%UKRANIAN BANDURIST CHORUS: $5k → 17%UKRANIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $1k → 17%UKRANIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $1k → 17%UKRANIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $850 → 17%THE BOWERY MISSION: $1k → 17%UKRANIAN ORTH: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
ND
IL
MI
NY
SD
PA
CT
VA
MD
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$403k · 27 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
13

Total granted

$403k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+106%

Still filing today

44%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalReligionHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UI
    UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +54%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $2k · revenue +13%
  • CH
    Christian Herald Association Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • UB
    UKRANIAN BANDURUST CHORUS OF NORTH
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
2
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
3
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
4
Ukraine Global Scholars Foundation

UGS assists bright Ukrainian high school students from modest backgrounds in getting a world-class education abroad, in exchange for their commitment to returning to Ukraine and working there for at least five years. UGS aims to develop a…

Education
5
Ukrainian Academy of Arts & Sciences in the U S Inc

Research, advancement and promotion of Ukrainian studies and culture in the United States.

Arts & Culture
6
Ukraine-Moldova American Enterprise Fund

Ukraine-moldova american enterprise fund was created and funded by the us (see schedule o)

International
7
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
8
Ukrainian Studies Chair Fund Inc

Funding charitable and educational work in Ukrainian studies.

—
9
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
10
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
11
Ukrainian Chorus Dumka of America Inc

The ucda is comprised of a ukrainian chorus & ukrainian dance ensembles, which educate, train and perform ukrainian music & dance mainly through-out the tri-state area.

Arts & Culture
12
Ukrainian Free University Foundation Inc

Provide financial aid to preserve conscientiousness and identity, cultural heritage and tradition among ukrainian youth, especially among students of higher educational institutions in the united states and abroad.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Museum of Natural History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UKRANIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF TRANSFI: $294,965 · OtherUKRANIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF TRANSFIVARIOUS ORGANIZED CHARITIES: $55,631 · OtherVARIOUS ORGANIZED CHARITIES+28 more: $54,250 · Other+28 moreRAZOM INC: $7,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 · InternationalRevived Soldiers Ukraine: $1,000 · InternationalUKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $3,850 · Arts & CultureGTEV SCHLIERACTALER STAMM INC: $1,025 · Arts & CultureUKRAINIAN MUSEUM: $755 · Arts & CultureLIEDERKRANZ FOUNDATION INC: $510 · Arts & CultureAmerican Museum of Natural History: $350 · Arts & CultureChristian Herald Association Inc: $1,350 · ReligionUkrainian Catholic University Foundation: $900 · ReligionST FRANCIS HOSPITAL: $440 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $350 · HealthDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $475 · Public Benefit
Other$404,846International$10,000Arts & Culture$6,490Religion$2,250Health$790Public Benefit$475

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAZOM INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $3,850 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc: $1,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRevived Soldiers Ukraine: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUkrainian Catholic University Foundation: $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUKRAINIAN MUSEUM: $755 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLIEDERKRANZ FOUNDATION INC: $510 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $475 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST FRANCIS HOSPITAL: $440 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMASSAPEQUA FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $300 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
  • Who funds UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Christian Herald Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds GTEV SCHLIERACTALER STAMM INC ↗
  • Who funds Revived Soldiers Ukraine ↗
  • Who funds UNITED UKRAINIAN AMERICAN RELIEF COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds Ukrainian Catholic University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UKRAINIAN MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds LIEDERKRANZ FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ukrainian American Co…Charles Stewart Mott …Jpmorgan Chase Founda…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Ukrainian American Community (Uac) Foundation IncNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ukrainian American Community (Uac) Foundation Inc · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fedoriw Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fedoriw Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fedoriw Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home