Skip to content

· Private foundation

Faye & Mayer Krupp Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$275k
Granted FY2023
34
Grants FY2023
9
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

61% of Faye & Mayer Krupp Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 16 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Faye & Mayer Krupp Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 21 organizations, $275k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’17
0
’18
0
’19
23
’20
21
’21
17
’22
21
’23
16
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.6MInternational$499kHuman Services$204kFood & Nutrition$141kHealth$99kReligion$54kEnvironment$34kEducation$26kOther$0
02FY2023 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k29 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $116k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$2,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HIAS$100,000
SHOLOM HOME$42,000
ALRIGHT$31,400
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$24,600
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE$18,000
CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND$5,400
MCLEAN HOSPITAL$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$4,800
HEPATITUS B FOUNDATION$4,800
BOSTON FOUNDATION$4,600
STEP (FOOD SHELF)$4,200
KEREM SHALOM INC$3,900
NRDC$3,600
NECHAMA-JEWISH RESPONSE TO DISASTER$3,330
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE$2,160
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH COLLABORATIVE SERVICES: $1k → 14%JEWISH COLLABORATIVE SERVICES: $1k → 14%JEWISH COLLABORATIVE SERVICES: $1k → 14%JEWISH COLLABORATIVE SERVICES: $1k → 14%JEWISH COLLABORATIVE SERVICES: $500 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $3k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $2k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $2k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
SD
IN
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
NM
DC
LA
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$823k · 36 repeat orgs$973k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
26

Total granted

$823k
$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+30%

Still filing today

56%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $803k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHealthInternationalCivil RightsHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • A
    ALIGHT
    4× · 2021–2024 · $150k · revenue +22%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $136k · revenue +63%
  • Feeding America
    2× · 2020–2021 · $111k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • A(
    ALIGHT (FORMERLY AMERICAN REFUGEE COMMITTEE)
    one grant, 2020 · $16k
  • EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue -66%
  • CF
    CHINESE FOR ALTERNATIVE ACT
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
4
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
5
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
6
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
7
Namati Inc

Namati, inc. (namati) is dedicated to putting the law in people's hands. we strive to build a just world, in which every one of us can take part in the decisions and demand accountability from the institutions that affect our lives.…

Crime & Legal
8
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
9
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
10
Fresh Energy

Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.

Environment
11
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
12
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc; the most unlike its peers is One Love. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/44
Grantees still filing
32/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,564,915 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST+3 more: $11,275 · PhilanthropyIndividual grant recipient: $782,470 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSHOLOM HOME: $178,100 · OtherSHOLOM HOME+47 more: $228,880 · Other+47 moreALIGHT: $150,400 · InternationalALIGHTInternational Rescue Committee INC: $136,400 · InternationalInternational Re…AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $111,400 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH …HIAS INC: $100,000 · InternationalHIAS INC+1 more: $500 · InternationalFeeding America: $111,370 · Food & NutritionRHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION: $8,500 · Food & NutritionHEPATITIS B FOUNDATION: $20,940 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $19,860 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $2,600 · HealthGeneration Patient Inc: $2,500 · Health+2 more: $1,750 · HealthNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $21,640 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $5,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $2,750 · EnvironmentLOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE: $1,500 · Environment+2 more: $1,250 · EnvironmentJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $8,520 · Human ServicesJEWISH COLLABORATIVE SERVICES: $4,500 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $2,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$1,576,190Other$1,189,450International$498,700Food & Nutrition$119,870Health$47,650Environment$32,140Human Services$15,020

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,564,915 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALIGHT: $150,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $136,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $111,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $111,370 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $21,640 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHEPATITIS B FOUNDATION: $20,940 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $19,860 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $8,520 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $8,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNECHAMA - JEWISH RESPONSE TO DISASTER: $7,330 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBoston Foundation Inc: $6,775 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COLLABORATIVE SERVICES: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FUND - SUPPORT RESEARCH CURE INC: $3,300 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetMINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $3,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONE LOVE: $2,940 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMORE THAN WORDS INC: $2,765 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $2,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGeneration Patient Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE MOVEMENT: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $1,560 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMOS HOUSE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR PROMOTION OF JEWISH SECULARISM INC: $900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE YOUTH STUDENT MOVEMENT: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT LYME: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUE RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONE FAIR WAGE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF COMBATANTS FOR PEACE INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREACH COLLECTIVE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNDN COLLECTIVE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ALIGHT ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds HEPATITIS B FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NECHAMA - JEWISH RESPONSE TO DISASTER ↗
  • Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COLLABORATIVE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FUND - SUPPORT RESEARCH CURE INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ONE LOVE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Proteus Fund Inc · New Venture Fund · The Minneapolis Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Faye & Mayer Krupp Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Faye & Mayer Krupp Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 24%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • More Than Words Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Faye & Mayer Krupp Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Faye & Mayer Krupp Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Faye & Mayer Krupp Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph