Skip to content
Fanny Landwirth Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Fanny Landwirth Foundation Inc

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$279k
Granted FY2017
28
Grants FY2017
4
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

96% of Fanny Landwirth Foundation Inc’s FY2018 grant dollars went to The Community Foundation For Northeast Florida Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2018 names 13 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year Fanny Landwirth Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 19 organizations, $319k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

19
’17
13
’18

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Philanthropy$6.0MArts & Culture$127kHealth$91kHousing & Shelter$86kHuman Services$74kEducation$49kFood & Nutrition$32kYouth Development$30kOther$0
02FY2017 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k9 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $296k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLARA WHITE MISSION$27,573
COMMUNITY HOSPICE - PEDCARE$25,000
FRESH MINISTRIES INC$25,000
DANIEL MEMORIAL INC$20,000
MANNA FOODBANK$20,000
BUNCOMBE PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN$20,000
JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES$17,500
HUBBARD HOUSE$15,000
ART WITH A HEART IN HEALTHCARE$15,000
TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN-DUVAL$15,000
YMCA OF ASHEVILLE & WNC$15,000
PISGAH LEGAL SERVICES$10,750
ISSER & RAE PRICE JUDAICA LIBRARY (UFF)$10,000
MISSION HOUSE$10,000
ONTRACK$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MISSION HOUSE: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $18k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 14%CLARA WHITE MISSION: $28k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$164k · 8 repeat orgs$430k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +173% since the first grant, against +81% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2017, 0 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2017 (too recent to call). Read against FY2017, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
33

Total granted

$164k
$430k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+173%
+81%

Still filing today

75%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $198k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
EducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterArts & CultureHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BUNCOMBE COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $35k · revenue +173%
  • MANNA FOOD BANK INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $30k · revenue +230%
  • PL
    PISGAH LEGAL SERVICES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $26k · revenue +274%

Funded once

  • UH
    US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • CW
    CLARA WHITE MISSION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $28k · revenue -21%
  • FM
    FRESH MINISTRIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +103%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat for Humanity of Nc Inc

Seeking to put Gods love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. Habitat for Humanity of North Carolina…

Housing & Shelter
2
Coalition for the Homeless of Central Florida Inc

The purpose of the organization is to transform the lives of homeless men, women, and children by providing crucial services to end their crisis of homelessness.

—
3
Family Promise of Jacksonvilleinc

Family promise works to end homelessness one family at a time. its focus is on families with children which is 30% of the nation's homeless. it offers two programs, temporary shelter, and family support, a prevention and diversion.

Housing & Shelter
4
Urban Ministries of Durham Inc

Established in 1983, Urban Ministries of Durham provides case management to end people's homelessness, offer emergency shelter, free meals, groceries, clothing, referral to needed resources, workforce and life skills training, and…

—
5
Cabarrus Cooperative Christian Ministry

To respond to the growing need in our community by providing immediate assistance to residents of Concord, Kannapolis, and Cabarrus County, NC who are experiencing crisis in the areas of food, shelter or finances while providing them…

—
6
Friendship Place

Friendship Place is a leader in the Washington, DC, metro area in developing solutions to homelessness that have measurable results and a lasting impact. Friendship Place's mission is to empower people who are experiencing or at risk of…

Housing & Shelter
7
Refugee Hope Partners Inc

To engage, equip, and encourage our refugee neighbors so that all may thrive.

Human Services
8
Taskforce Fore Ending Homelessness Inc

To get our neighbors experiencing homelessness off the street through proactive outreach and services and provide placement in a program that will help them get "home."

Human Services
9
Habitat for Humanity of Florida Inc

Habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, community, and hope. through advocacy, building capacity, communication & education and disaster resilience, response and recovery, habitat for humanity of florida advances the…

Housing & Shelter
10
Communities in Schools of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Inc

The mission of Communities In Schools is to surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Education
11
Freedom Life Ministries

Freedom Life is a faith-based nonprofit grounded in values of restoration and accountability helping justice involved individuals and their families break the cycle of incarceration. We provide inclusive evidence-informed support to…

Crime & Legal
12
Bounty & Soul

Together we connect, share, and celebrate nutritious food, education and community.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeward Bound of Western North Carolina Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jq International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
26/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC: $4,000,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST FLORIDA INCTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $2,000,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INCUS HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM: $100,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY HOSPICE - PEDCARE: $25,000 · OtherONTRACK: $17,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY HOSPICE OF NE FLORIDA: $15,000 · OtherYMCA OF ASHEVILLE & WNC: $15,000 · OtherTAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN-DUVAL: $15,000 · OtherMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 · OtherPISGAH LEGAL SERVICES: $25,750 · OtherFRESH MINISTRIES INC: $25,000 · Other+15 more: $93,750 · OtherCLARA WHITE MISSION INC: $27,573 · Human ServicesTHE LJD JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $19,000 · Human ServicesHUBBARD HOUSE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesMission House Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesBUNCOMBE COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $35,000 · EducationSeniors on a Mission Inc: $15,000 · EducationOpen Doors of Asheville Inc: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationHOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $16,000 · Housing & ShelterCommunity Housing Coalition of Madison County Inc: $12,500 · Housing & ShelterOperation New Hope Inc: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterART WITH A HEART IN HEALTHCARE INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureArts For Life: $11,000 · Arts & CultureAsheville Symphony Society Inc: $7,500 · Arts & CultureDANIEL MEMORIAL INC: $20,000 · HealthABILITY HOUSING INC: $10,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,500 · Health
Philanthropy$6,000,000Other$362,000Human Services$71,573Education$56,000Housing & Shelter$38,500Arts & Culture$33,500Health$32,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBUNCOMBE COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLARA WHITE MISSION INC: $27,573 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPISGAH LEGAL SERVICES: $25,750 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRESH MINISTRIES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDANIEL MEMORIAL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LJD JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $19,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $16,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetART WITH A HEART IN HEALTHCARE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetSeniors on a Mission Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetHUBBARD HOUSE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCommunity Housing Coalition of Madison County Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetArts For Life: $11,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBeaches Emergency Assistance Ministry I Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOperation New Hope Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMission House Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetABILITY HOUSING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLiteracy Together: $7,750 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetAsheville Symphony Society Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOpen Doors of Asheville Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMuddy Sneakers Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA GIFT FOR TEACHING INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAsheville GreenWorks: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Cross Blue Shiel…The Community Foundat…The Community Foundat…Jacksonville Jaguars …Publix Super Markets …United Way of Northea…Pga Tour IncTd Charitable Foundat…Truist Foundation IncRichard Eckerd Founda…The Jim Moran Foundat…Mayo Clinic Group Ret…
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida FoundationFL27.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · United Way of Northeast Florida Inc · Pga Tour Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · Richard Eckerd Foundation Inc · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · Mayo Clinic Group Return

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fanny Landwirth Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fanny Landwirth Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Hubbard House Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Ability Housing Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Operation New Hope Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Clara White Mission Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fanny Landwirth Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Fanny Landwirth Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fanny Landwirth’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home