· Private foundation
Family Foundations Cooperative
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF LAS VEGAS | $4,000 |
| MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION | $3,235 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA | $2,500 |
| ST JOSEPH HUSBAND OF MARY | $1,460 |
| CARE NET PREGNANCY SERVICES OF THE TREASURE COAST | $1,000 |
| NATHAN ADELSON HOSPICE | $950 |
| COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL | $610 |
| OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE | $585 |
| FOSTER KINSHIP | $540 |
| SHINE A LIGHT FOUNDATION | $515 |
| CUTANEOUS LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION | $511 |
| LAS VEGAS ACADEMY OF THE ARTS | $300 |
| NEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS | $200 |
| RED ROVER | $106 |
| NEVADA CASA ASSOCIATION | $103 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TRTHE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF LAS VEGAS2× · 2023–2024 · $9k
- MAMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $3k
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- ARAMERICAN RED CROSSone grant, 2023 · $1k
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +50%- WRWOMENS RESOURCE MEDICAL CENTERSone grant, 2023 · $200 · revenue -21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.
To ensure equal access to justice for low-income nevadans.
To support programs providing the highest quality service to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. these services include a residential program at eagle valley children's home and a respite program provided in the…
Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…
To remove the "no pets allowed" sign on the doors of domestic violence shelters. women should not have to choose between leaving their abuser and leaving their pets behind to be abused.
Our mission is to strengthen the women in our community to tap into the inner strength they all possess and assist them in rebuilding their lives. We desire to instill goal oriented family focused values in the moms we serve so they will…
The foundation's mission is to enhance the quality of life for children with cancer and their families by providing financial assistance and compassionate support programs while advocating for increased research funds and raising public…
Nurses for newborns (the organization) is a not-for-profit missouri corporation whose purpose is to provide home-based services to promote the health, safety, and well-being of babies and their families. the organization has two branches…
Safe kids worldwide is a global nonprofit organization dedicated to preventing childhood injuries.
To protect private property rights and enhance the success and profitability of the real estate profession.
Nevada child seekers mission is to advocate for and engage in prevention, identification and location efforts on behalf of missing and exploited children.
The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Southern Nevada and the most unlike its peers is Womens Resource Medical Centers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds Nathan Adelson Hospice Inc ↗
- Who funds FOSTER KINSHIP ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds SHINE A LIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CUTANEOUS LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOMENS RESOURCE MEDICAL CENTERS ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER ↗
- Who funds NEVADA CASA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds INJURED POLICE OFFICERS FUND ↗
- Who funds NEVADA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LEAD WITH LOVE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Nevada Community Foundation Inc · Mgm Resorts Foundation · Robert S & Dorothy J Keyser Foundation · The Tiberti Family Foundation · The Boyd Family Foundation · Cashman Family Foundation · Canarelli Family Foundation · Vegas Golden Knights Foundation Inc · Engelstad Family Foundation · United Way of Southern Nevada · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · America's Charities
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Family Foundations Cooperative funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.