· Private foundation
The Tiberti Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNLV FOUNDATION | $8,000 |
| TOURO UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| FREEDOM HOUSE SOBER LIVING | $5,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SO NV | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $4,000 |
| CSN FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| ST VIATOR CATHOLIC CHURCH | $3,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $3,000 |
| SPRINGS PRESERVE FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| GILCREASE ORCHARD FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| NEVADA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| ST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| CLARK HIGH SCHOOL | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $70k · revenue +18%
- FHFREEDOM HOUSE SOBER LIVING8× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +75%
- TUTOURO UNIVERSITY NEVADA5× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- FIFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GFone grant, 2024 · $342k
- COCOLLEGE OF SO NV - NURSING SCHone grant, 2022 · $5k
- OLOUR LADY OF THE VALLEYone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The nevada council on problem gambling is a non-profit information and referral agency whose efforts are focused on reducing the impact of problem gambling on individuals, families and communities in nevada. it is the mission of the nevada…
The foundation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for the purposes of supporting, promoting, and reporting research activities at the university of nevada, las vegas, as an entity of the board of regents of the nevada system of…
The nevada state parks foundation is dedicated to enhancing and preserving the natural beauty, cultural heritage and recreational opportunities within the nevada division of state parks. the foundation is committed to supporting the…
The mission of the nevada state college foundation board of trustees is to serve as ambassadors for nevada state college, to serve as fiduciary stewards of funds received by the foundation, and to raise funds in support of the educational,…
To preserve and protect the special places and open spaces of nevada for future generations.
Our membership is united in pursuit of immediate and continuous improvements to the state's education system. we support an ambitious, agressive and comprehensive reform agenda to dramatically increase the college and workforce readiness…
Nevada veterans foundation's mission is to help improve quality of life for members of the military, military retirees, veterans and their families in the state of nevada.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ymca of Southern Nevada and the most unlike its peers is Gilcrease Orchard Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 7. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 41% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 24% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LAS VEGAS AREA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE SOBER LIVING ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds ST JUDES RANCH FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds TOURO UNIVERSITY NEVADA ↗
- Who funds Nathan Adelson Hospice Inc ↗
- Who funds NEVADA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN NEVADA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PATRICK KELLEY YOUTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR AN INDEPENDENT TOMORROW ↗
- Who funds NEVADA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds Nevada Contractors Association ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds LAS VEGAS NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mgm Resorts Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · Engelstad Family Foundation · Canarelli Family Foundation · United Way of Southern Nevada · The Boyd Family Foundation · Vegas Golden Knights Foundation Inc · The Mel & Ruth Wolzinger Foundation · The Bennett Family Foundation · Wynn Resorts Foundation · Speedway Children's Charities
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Tiberti Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.