Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Families USA Foundation Inc

Our vision is a nation where the best health and health care are equally accessible and affordable to all.

$25k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2023.

Health$913kInternational$90kPublic Benefit$33kCivil Rights$20k
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALABAMA ARISE$15,000
TAKEACTION MINNESOTA$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LATINO COMMUNITY FUND OF WASHINGTON STATE: $20k → 9%OPEN DOORS FOR MULTICULTURAL FAMILIES: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
OR
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$640k · 6 repeat orgs$416k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
12

Total granted

$640k
$391k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-68%
+24%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
HealthPublic BenefitCivil RightsHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    COLORADO CONSUMER HEALTH INITIATIVE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $170k · revenue -24%
  • MH
    Missouri Health Care for All
    3× · 2019–2021 · $140k · revenue -96%
  • NJ
    NEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $120k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • HE
    HEALTH EQUITY SOLUTIONS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $173k · revenue -40%
  • IC
    ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTSgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue +54%
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CARE NETWORK OF KANSAS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue +70%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Consumer Health Coalition

Consumer Health Coalition (CHC) is dedicated to inspiring a consumer movement to advance the health and enhance access to quality and affordable healthcare. We further our mission by targeting populations that are at risk for experiencing…

Health
2
CommonHealth Action

CommonHealth ACTION develops people and organizations to produce health through equitable policies, programs, and practices.

Health
3
National Coalition On Health Care

The mission of the national coalition on health care (nchc) is to support research and analysis, develop and promote policy solutions, build consensus, and engage the public in order to ensure that america has a high quality health system…

Health
4
Alliance for a Healthier South Carolina

Convene and connect diverse stakeholders to align and catalyze efforts to improve health and well-being for communities across South Carolina.

—
5
Health Care for All Oregon

Hcao educates about and advocates for an equitable, affordable, comprehensive, high-quality publicly funded universal healthcare system that will improve the lives of individuals, families and communities across oregon and throughout the…

Health
6
HealthImpact

To shape health care through workforce strategy, stakeholder convening, and policy advocacy.

Health
7
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
8
New Jersey Citizen Action

To protect and expand the rights of citizens of the state of new jersey, and encourage active citizen involvement in campaigns promoting economic, social and racial equity.

—
9
Healthcare Access Maryland Inc

We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.

Health
10
Oregon Latino Health Coalition

Oregon latino health coalition advances the health of latinos through policy, advocacy, and prevention.

Health
11
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
12
Wnc Health Network Inc

WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health Equity Solutions Inc and the most unlike its peers is Arizona Community Health Workers Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COLORADO CONSUMER HEALTH INITIATIVE — $170,250 · OtherCOLORADO CONSUMER HEALTH INITIATIVEMissouri Health Care for All — $140,000 · OtherMissouri Health Care for AllHeartland Alliance for Human Needs and Rights — $90,000 · OtherHeartland Alliance for Human Needs and RightsAXENE HEALTH PARTNERS LLC — $80,000 · OtherAXENE HEALTH PARTNERS LLCCOMMUNITY CARE NETWORK OF KANSAS INC — $40,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CARE NETWORK OF KANSAS INC+1 more — $10,000 · OtherHEALTH EQUITY SOLUTIONS INC — $173,000 · HealthHEALTH EQUITY SOLUTIONS IN…North Carolina Aids Action Network — $40,000 · HealthNorth Carolina Aids Action…Arizona Community Health Workers Association Inc — $20,000 · HealthArizona Community Health W…HEALTH ACTION NEW MEXICO — $10,000 · HealthNEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND INC — $120,000 · Public BenefitNEW JERSEY CITIZ…ALABAMA ARISE — $15,000 · Public BenefitALABAMA ARISETAKEACTION MN EDUCATION FUND — $10,000 · Public BenefitTAKEACTION MN ED…Center on Budget and Policy Priorities — $7,500 · Public BenefitILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS — $40,000 · Civil RightsALABAMA FORWARD — $20,000 · Civil RightsLatino Community Fund of Washington State — $20,000 · Human ServicesOPEN DOORS FOR MULTICULTURAL FAMILIES — $20,000 · Human ServicesNC COUNTS COALITION — $20,000 · EducationOSPIRG FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Environment
Other$530,250Health$243,000Public Benefit$152,500Civil Rights$60,000Human Services$40,000Education$20,000Environment$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHEALTH EQUITY SOLUTIONS INC — $173,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetCOLORADO CONSUMER HEALTH INITIATIVE — $170,250 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetMissouri Health Care for All — $140,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetNEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND INC — $120,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetHeartland Alliance for Human Needs and Rights — $90,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorth Carolina Aids Action Network — $40,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetALABAMA FORWARD — $20,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetLatino Community Fund of Washington State — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNC COUNTS COALITION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetArizona Community Health Workers Association Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetOPEN DOORS FOR MULTICULTURAL FAMILIES — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALABAMA ARISE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHEALTH ACTION NEW MEXICO — $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTENNESSEE HEALTH CARE CAMPAIGN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTAKEACTION MN EDUCATION FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOSPIRG FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Catalyst IncNew Venture FundCommunity Catalyst Ac…Amalgamated Charitabl…The Robert Wood Johns…Marguerite Casey Foun…NEO Philanthropy IncTides FoundationAmerican Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Catalyst IncMA26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Catalyst Inc · New Venture Fund · Community Catalyst Action Fund Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Marguerite Casey Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Tides Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Families USA Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Health Equity Solutions Inc — 14% of income from government
  • New Jersey Citizen Action Education Fund Inc — 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines