How much did FAIRVIEW FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

Philanthropy$1.4MInternational$522kHuman Services$440kEmployment$300kHealth$300kYouth Development$190kCrime & Legal$135kRecreation & Sports$60kEducation$60kOther$920k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

leadershiptraining

2020

leadershiptraining

2021

leadership

2022

—

2023

—

2024

global women

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k4 grants · $95k
$50k–250k6 grants · $515k
$250k+1 grant · $320k

$50,000

Median grant

States reached

$24M

Total assets

Largest grants

GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN FOR THE BALKANS MOVEMENT$320,000
GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN FOR CHAMPIONS FOR CLIMATE JUSTIC$200,000
JUSTICE OUTSIDE$115,000
HOMELESS PRENATAL PROGRAM$50,000
WILDMIND$50,000
SUMMER SEARCH$50,000
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY$50,000
CAMP PHOENIX$40,000
PROJECT AVARY$25,000
GIRLVENTURES$20,000
TAHOE FUND$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $440k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.7M · 17 repeat orgs$625k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.7M

$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%

+41%

Still filing today

82%

75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $580k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

GF
GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN
2× · 2021–2022 · $522k · revenue +73%
JO
JUSTICE OUTSIDE
3× · 2022–2024 · $345k · revenue +609%
SS
SUMMER SEARCH
6× · 2019–2024 · $300k · revenue +52%

Funded once

GC
GOLESTAN CENTER FOR LANGUAGE IMMERSION & CULTURAL EDUCATIONgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +41%
SP
SAFE PLACE INTERNATIONAL DREAM ACADEMY
one grant, 2022 · $10k
TT
THE THACHER SCHOOL
one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -53%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Oakland Kids First

Oakland Kids First is a community-based nonprofit in Oakland, CA that empowers young people to reimagine broken systems and organize for equitable public schools by providing youth leadership development, youth organizing, and community…

Youth Development

Oakland Leaf Foundation

Oakland Leaf cultivates community transformation through creative education for youth and families. Oakland Leaf runs seven comprehensive afterschool programs, a summer camp, and one internship.

Education

Techbridge Girls

Techbridge Girls re-engineers the way BIPOC girls* from marginalized communities experience STEM by catalyzing out-of- school time STEM educators and STEM professionals into equity educators and advo- cates through training and curricula…

Education

Oakland Fund for Public Innovation

The Oakland Fund reaches across the city, engaging private partners to innovate, test and scale ideas that enhance Oakland. The Fund strives to improve the prosperity, safety and quality of life for all Oaklanders with projects that: build…

Community Improvement

Alliance for Girls

Alliance for Girls is strengthening leadership in the girls' service sector through research, advocacy, professional development, and collaboration. Our mission is to ensure that girl-serving organizations are more connected, more…

Youth Development

Girls Incorporated of the Central Coast

Inspire all girls to be strong, smart, bold and to respect themselves and the world around them. Offering programs that deliver innovative activities preparing young women for economic independence and confident adulthood.

Youth Development

Peninsula Youth Theatre

PYTs mission is to provide outstanding theatrical learning experiences that develop leadership, emphasize responsibility, and foster teamwork in a supportive and respectful environment.

Unclassified

Hack the Hood Inc

Hack the Hood provides free tech education training programs to youth of color via 8 - 12 week coding and data analytics bootcamps. These youth hone their skills by creating websites for small businesses and receive career exposure and…

Arts & Culture

Girls on the Run of the Bay Area Inc

Girls on the Run of the Bay Area inspires youth to be joyful, healthy and confident using a fun, hands-on curriculum which creatively integrates outdoor exercises and running. We aim to ensure that every participant, no matter their…

Recreation & Sports

Mearth

MEarth mission is to educate and inspire through environmental stewardship. We deliver K-12 environmental stewardship education programs for Monterey County youth and community members.

Youth Development

California School-Age Consortium Inc

The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…

—

The Mosaic Project

The mosaic project works toward a peaceful future by uniting children of diverse backgrounds, providing them with essential community building skills, and empowering them to become peacemakers.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Justice Outside and the most unlike its peers is Larkin Street Youth Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

18/18

Grantees still filing

14/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Philanthropy$1,378,512Other$1,175,000International$522,071Human Services$440,000Employment$300,000Health$300,000Youth Development$190,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA25.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Bernard E & Alba Witkin Charitable · The Joseph and Vera Long Foundation · Clif Family Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San · Marin Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Morris Stulsaft Foundation · Justice Outside · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation FAIRVIEW FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CAMP PHOENIX.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 461470903 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CAMP PHOENIX, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 21% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Fairview Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fairview Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

FAIRVIEW FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Fairview Foundation?

More from the funding graph

FAIRVIEW FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Fairview Foundation?

More from the funding graph