· Public charity
Latino Community Fund of Washington State
Improve the well-being of the Latinos in Washington State
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $173,544 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $708,351 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $534,807 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $166k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Northwest Immigrant Rights | $28,000 |
| Northwest Justice Project | $27,500 |
| Columbia Legal Services | $17,500 |
| Somos Mujeres Latinas WA | $16,500 |
| MIA- Mujeres in Action | $15,000 |
| Alliance for a Just Society | $15,000 |
| Latinao Bar Association | $14,044 |
| Orquesta Northwest | $12,500 |
| Clark County Latino Youth | $10,000 |
| Empowering Latina Leadership | $10,000 |
| Rods House | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $741k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NINORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT2× · 2023–2024 · $104k · revenue +3%
- TCTHE COMMUNITY FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF FAMILY EDUCATION3× · 2019–2021 · $98k · revenue +284%
- NCNuestra CASA3× · 2018–2020 · $88k · revenue +844%
Funded once
- FAFront and Centeredone grant, 2020 · $695k · revenue +23% · 33% of their budget
- UEUNITED EARLY LEARNING & FAMILY CENTone grant, 2020 · $55k
- SFScholar Fundgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $32k · revenue +199%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…
We increase access to economic opportunities for business owners, entrepreneurs, and individuals in Central Washington by connecting and providing them with resources, representation, and opportunities to build community.
Rainier Beach Action Coalition is a grassroot, Black-led organization devoted to locally driven development. It promotes quality education, living wage jobs, affordable transportation and housing, and building community capacity in…
Progreso's mission is to ensure that latino communities are fairly represented in washington states social, economic and political systems to improve the quality of life for all washingtonians. we believe that community-based support,…
Connect immigrants to legal, social, and interpretation services.
Washington Indian Civil Rights Commission is led by and for Indigenous people, and envisions a just society in which we are treated with honor, fairness and respect. Our mission is to uphold our individual civil rights through education…
Comunidad seeks to build community, cultural pride, and economic opportunities for the Latino community on Vashon Island and its neighboring communities.
Asians for Collective Action (ACA) harnesses the strenghts of Asians and Asian Americans to drive systemic change to create a just, healthy, and thriving community for all.
Washington Community Alliance WCA is a statewide network of over 70 organizations working to advance multiracial social democracy by coordinating values aligned civic engagement
We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…
Improve the well-being of the Latinos in Washington State
The Coalition is dedicated to educating Latino immigrant newcomers, celebrating hispanic culture, and advocating for underserved segments of the population. Programs and initiatives include economic development, legal counsel, community…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Immigrant Rights Project and the most unlike its peers is Organizacion Centroamericana. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 23% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 121 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Front and Centered ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON IMMIGRANT SOLIDARITY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds ORGANIZACION CENTROAMERICANA ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF FAMILY EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Nuestra CASA ↗
- Who funds LA CASA HOGAR ↗
- Who funds Northwest Justice Project ↗
- Who funds ENTRE HERMANOS ↗
- Who funds Na'ah Illahee Fund ↗
- Who funds RVC SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA LEGAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND NORTH IDAHO ↗
- Who funds PROTEUS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CASA LATINA ↗
- Who funds Para Los Ninos de Highline ↗
- Who funds Carl Maxey Center ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds Scholar Fund ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR WASHINGTONS FUTURE ↗
- Who funds ONEAMERICA ↗
- Who funds Panama Folklore ↗
- Who funds ORQUESTA NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds EMPOWERING LATINA LEADERSHIP & ACTION ↗
- Who funds EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA ↗
- Who funds YAKIMA PRIDE ↗
- Who funds South Park Area Redevelopment Committee ↗
- Who funds COLECTIVA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO ↗
- Who funds OutSpokane ↗
- Who funds Tacoma Urban League ↗
- Who funds Got Green ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inatai Foundation · Philanthropy Northwest · Seattle Foundation · Social Justice Fund Northwest · School's Out Washington · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Front and Centered · Washington Progress Fund · United Way of King County · Yakima Valley Community Foundation · Colectiva Legal del Pueblo · Legal Foundation of Washington
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Latino Community Fund of Washington State funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.