Skip to content
Exchange Club Charitable Organization at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Exchange Club Charitable Organization

The exchange club of naperville is dedicated to civic service by active involvement of local members in community projects, particularly projects with a goal of preventing child abuse and domestic violence.

$136k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Human Services$1.5MHealth$276kYouth Development$241kHousing & Shelter$178kFood & Nutrition$158kCrime & Legal$152kRecreation & Sports$59kReligion$57kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $119,997, the rows itemized in this filing. The $136,193 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,196 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$119,997
Median grant
1
States reached
$101k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT HELP$119,997
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $575k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MUTUAL GROUND: $26k → 8%FAMILY SHELTER SERVICE: $12k → 14%MUTUAL GROUND: $23k → 8%YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $8k → 14%MUTUAL GROUND: $20k → 8%YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $7k → 14%RISE FROM THE ASHES: $8k → 7%YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $5k → 14%LOAVES & FISHES: $58k → 7%LOAVES & FISHES: $57k → 7%LOAVES & FISHES: $44k → 7%OUR CHILDRENS HOMESTEAD: $23k → 7%OUR CHILDRENS HOMESTEAD: $19k → 7%OUR CHILDRENS HOMESTEAD: $15k → 7%FAMILY SHELTER SERVICES: $28k → 7%FAMILY SHELTER SERVICES: $24k → 7%FAMILY SHELTER SERVICES: $18k → 7%SHARING CONNECTIONS: $6k → 7%SHARING CONNECTIONS: $6k → 7%360 YOUTH SERVICES: $51k → 7%360 YOUTH SERVICES: $47k → 7%360 YOUTH SERVICES: $39k → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS: $6k → 7%RIVERWALK ADULT DAY CARE: $6k → 7%EDCUATION CENTER: $6k → 7%ECUMENICAL ADULT DAY CARE: $5k → 7%EDCUATION CENTER: $5k → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 30 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 29 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
5

Total granted

$2.6M
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+89%

Still filing today

90%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES
    3× · 2017–2019 · $158k · revenue +124%
  • 3Y
    360 YOUTH SERVICES
    3× · 2017–2019 · $137k · revenue +85%
  • BC
    BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $108k · revenue +143%

Funded once

  • MF
    Metropolitan Family Servicesgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $12k · revenue +89%
  • DL
    DUPAGE LEGAL AID FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +94%
  • RF
    RISE FROM THE ASHES NFP
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue -73%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Family Services

Administering an array of critical, intensive therapeutic interventions and/or facilitation services to emotionally and behaviorally disturbed clients for whom DCFS is legally responsible in order to stabilize their traditional or home of…

Human Services
2
Childrens Advocacy Center of East Central Illinois

To assist children who have been victims of abuse

Crime & Legal
3
Child Advocacy Center of Mchenry Co Inc

Provide Counselors in Child Abuse Situations

Crime & Legal
4
Child Link Inc

Child Link provides foster care, family counseling, and therapy services to Chicago area adolescents who are at risk of homelessness. Child Link also refers adolescents to other agencies that are able to provide additional resources and…

Human Services
5
Lakeside Community Committee

To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.

Human Services
6
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Cook County

CASA of Cook County's vision is to protect abused and neglected children by providing them in court, a safe and permanent home, and an opportunity to grow, learn and thrive.

Crime & Legal
7
Family Counseling Services of No Il

To foster stronger communities by providing individuals with accessible, professional counseling and mental health care that empowers them to thrive

Human Services
8
Dayone Pact

Dayone pact is committed to assisting individuals with disabilities live engaged and meaningful lives through independent service coordination.

—
9
Chicago Children's Advocacy Center

The chicago children's advocacy center unites public, private, and community partners to ensure the safety, health, and well-being of abused children.

Crime & Legal
10
Depaul Community Services Inc

To provide residential and rehabilitation services to clients with mental illnesses

Health
11
Illinois Partners for Human Service

Illinois Partners for Human Service's primary activities are (1) strengthening human services in communities throughout Illinois by building a unified human services sector; (2) working with leaders, the public, and others engaged in the…

Human Services
12
Metropolitan Family Services DuPage

Metropolitan Family Services DuPage's mission is to provide and mobilize the services needed to strengthen families and communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teen Parent Connection Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rise From the Ashes Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
27/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROJECT HELP: $1,172,597 · OtherPROJECT HELPEdward Foundation: $175,000 · OtherEdward FoundationWAYSIDE CROSS MINISTRIES: $57,300 · OtherWESTERN DUPAGE SRA FOUNDATION: $58,600 · Other+10 more: $202,585 · Other+10 moreLOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $158,000 · Human ServicesLOAVES & FISHES COMMUNIT…360 YOUTH SERVICES: $137,000 · Human Services360 YOUTH SERVICESMUTUAL GROUND INC: $69,800 · Human ServicesMUTUAL GROUND INCFamily Shelter Service Inc: $69,175 · Human ServicesFamily Shelter Service I…OUR CHILDREN'S HOMESTEAD: $56,200 · Human ServicesOUR CHILDREN'S HOMESTEADRIVERWALK ADULT DAY SERVICES: $22,300 · Human ServicesYWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $20,100 · Human Services+4 more: $42,400 · Human Services+4 moreBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $108,000 · Housing & ShelterDUPAGE PADS INC: $38,050 · Housing & ShelterPrevent Child Abuse Illinois: $38,500 · Crime & LegalFRIENDS OF THE WILL COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $27,440 · Crime & LegalDUPAGE LEGAL AID FOUNDATION: $9,800 · Crime & LegalINSIDE OUT CLUB: $43,100 · PhilanthropyCAREER & NETWORKING CENTER: $27,500 · PhilanthropyCASA OF DUPAGE COUNTY INC: $62,700 · Civil RightsSamaritan Interfaith Counseling Center: $42,200 · HealthGIGI'S PLAYHOUSE INC: $19,035 · Health
Other$1,666,082Human Services$574,975Housing & Shelter$146,050Crime & Legal$75,740Philanthropy$70,600Civil Rights$62,700Health$61,235

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEdward Foundation: $175,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budget360 YOUTH SERVICES: $137,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $108,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetMUTUAL GROUND INC: $69,800 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFamily Shelter Service Inc: $69,175 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCASA OF DUPAGE COUNTY INC: $62,700 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetWESTERN DUPAGE SRA FOUNDATION: $58,600 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetSamaritan Interfaith Counseling Center: $42,200 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTEEN PARENT CONNECTION INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPrevent Child Abuse Illinois: $38,500 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetDUPAGE PADS INC: $38,050 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetALIVE CENTER NFP: $33,300 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetKIDSMATTER FOUNDATION INC: $27,600 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetCAREER & NETWORKING CENTER: $27,500 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WILL COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $27,440 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetBREAKING FREE INC: $24,800 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetRIVERWALK ADULT DAY SERVICES: $22,300 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetLiteracy DuPage: $22,200 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetYWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $20,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER AURORA: $19,900 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetGIGI'S PLAYHOUSE INC: $19,035 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNAPERVILLE AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $12,485 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARING CONNECTIONS INC: $11,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER: $11,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE FRIENDS INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUPAGE LEGAL AID FOUNDATION: $9,800 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFOX VALLEY HANDS OF HOPE INC: $5,300 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dupage Community …Naperville Rotary Cha…The Bersted FoundationCommunity Foundation …United Way of Metropo…The Richard M Schulze…Dunham FundTara FoundationBest Walter & Edith F…Lisle Community Servi…Dunham FoundationGeorge M Eisenberg Fo…
The Dupage Community FoundationIL38.1× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dupage Community Foundation · Naperville Rotary Charities Inc · The Bersted Foundation · Community Foundation of the Fox River Valley · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Dunham Fund · Tara Foundation · Best Walter & Edith Foundation · Lisle Community Service Corporation · Dunham Foundation · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Exchange Club Charitable Organization funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Exchange Club Charitable Organization. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Exchange Club Charitable Organization’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home