Skip to content

· Private foundation

Everoak Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Religion$37kHuman Services$20kHealth$9kPhilanthropy$7kInternational$7kFood & Nutrition$5kYouth Development$3kEducation$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$382k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMMANNE MINISTRIES$13,000
FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN$5,000
NEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION$4,000
CROSSFIRE MINISTRIES$2,000
Family Life Services$2,000
TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION$1,035
CPCD$1,000
Honor Flight of Southern Colorado$1,000
FRESH WIND CHINESE CHURCH$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ELIFE NETWORK$1,000
THE PLACE$998
SYNERGY ACADEMY FOR SUCCESS$996
YOUNG LIFE$520
The Rocky Mountain Field Institute$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE PLACE: $999 → 9%THE PLACE: $998 → 9%COS I LOVE YOU: $6k → 9%COS I LOVE YOU: $6k → 9%COS I LOVE YOU: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WY
IA
OH
CA
CO
VA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$68k · 15 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
15

Total granted

$68k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
0%

Still filing today

60%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCrime & LegalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    EMMANNE MINISTRIES
    4× · 2022–2025 · $21k · revenue +26%
  • CI
    COS I LOVE YOU
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +36%
  • CM
    Crossfire Ministries Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $7k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • OG
    ONECHILD GLOBAL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pueblo Rescue Mission

Because of our love for God, we extend his mercy as we strive to empower and improve the lives of unsheltered adults in Pueblo, CO, through provisions of food, shelter and navigational support services.

—
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
4
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
5
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
6
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
7
Christian Healing Network dba Mission Medical Center

The mission of the organization is to provide comprehensive health and wellness services to persons in the Pikes Peak Region of the State of Colorado who are uninsured or underinsured.

Religion
8
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
9
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
10
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
11
Colorado Christian Service Camp

Through this unique mountain environment to encourage and challenge campers to become fully devoted followers of christ by making decisions to follow christ rededicating their lives to christ and being called into full time ministry.

—
12
Crossroads Christian Counseling

Crossroads combines innovative clinical counseling with a redemptive worldview to restore people to emotional health, relational unity, and a hopeful future.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $9,819 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $6,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEThe Christian Home For Children Inc: $3,000 · OtherThe Christian Home For Children IncIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherCARE SHARE: $2,000 · OtherCPCD: $2,000 · OtherTHE RESTORATION PROJECT INC: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,500 · Other+15 more: $13,796 · Other+15 moreEMMANNE MINISTRIES: $20,750 · InternationalEMMANNE MINISTRIESONECHILD GLOBAL: $5,000 · InternationalONECHILD GLOBALFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $5,000 · InternationalFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INCINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $2,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSIONCOS I LOVE YOU: $14,500 · Human ServicesCOS I LOVE YOUThe Place: $1,997 · Human ServicesThe PlaceThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $6,000 · PhilanthropyTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $1,035 · PhilanthropyLOCKWOOD FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyCrossfire Ministries Inc: $7,200 · ReligionLife Network: $5,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $1,000 · HealthPEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $258 · HealthYOUNG LIFE: $1,976 · Youth Development
Other$42,115International$32,750Human Services$16,497Philanthropy$8,035Religion$7,200Health$6,258Youth Development$1,976

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMMANNE MINISTRIES: $20,750 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetCOS I LOVE YOU: $14,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCrossfire Ministries Inc: $7,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONECHILD GLOBAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLife Network: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Christian Home For Children Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Place: $1,997 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $1,976 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $1,035 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOCKWOOD FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetConnections Prison Ministry: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPEAK FOR THE UNSPOKEN: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRocky Mountain Field Institute Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMMANNE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds COS I LOVE YOU ↗
  • Who funds Crossfire Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ONECHILD GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds Life Network ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds The Christian Home For Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds The Place ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOCKWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Connections Prison Ministry ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds HONOR FLIGHT OF SOUTHERN COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds SPEAK FOR THE UNSPOKEN ↗
  • Who funds Rocky Mountain Field Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El Pomar FoundationCO19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El Pomar Foundation · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · Luther T McCauley Charitable Trust Xxxxx3001 · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Everoak Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Everoak Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Everoak Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Everoak Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Everoak’s filings →

    More from the funding graph