· Private foundation
Everoak Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EMMANNE MINISTRIES | $13,000 |
| FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN | $5,000 |
| NEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| CROSSFIRE MINISTRIES | $2,000 |
| Family Life Services | $2,000 |
| TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION | $1,035 |
| ELIFE NETWORK | $1,000 |
| CPCD | $1,000 |
| Honor Flight of Southern Colorado | $1,000 |
| FRESH WIND CHINESE CHURCH | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| THE PLACE | $998 |
| SYNERGY ACADEMY FOR SUCCESS | $996 |
| YOUNG LIFE | $520 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EMEMMANNE MINISTRIES4× · 2022–2025 · $21k · revenue +26%
- CICOS I LOVE YOU3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +36%
- CMCrossfire Ministries Inc3× · 2023–2025 · $7k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $10k
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEone grant, 2023 · $6k
- OGONECHILD GLOBALone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Because of our love for God, we extend his mercy as we strive to empower and improve the lives of unsheltered adults in Pueblo, CO, through provisions of food, shelter and navigational support services.
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…
To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.
The mission of the organization is to provide comprehensive health and wellness services to persons in the Pikes Peak Region of the State of Colorado who are uninsured or underinsured.
Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…
Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
Through this unique mountain environment to encourage and challenge campers to become fully devoted followers of christ by making decisions to follow christ rededicating their lives to christ and being called into full time ministry.
Crossroads combines innovative clinical counseling with a redemptive worldview to restore people to emotional health, relational unity, and a hopeful future.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EMMANNE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds COS I LOVE YOU ↗
- Who funds Crossfire Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Life Network ↗
- Who funds ONECHILD GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds The Christian Home For Children Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
- Who funds The Place ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LOCKWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Connections Prison Ministry ↗
- Who funds HONOR FLIGHT OF SOUTHERN COLORADO ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds SPEAK FOR THE UNSPOKEN ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Field Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds PEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: El Pomar Foundation · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · Luther T McCauley Charitable Trust Xxxxx3001 · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Everoak Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Everoak Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Everoak Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.