· Private foundation
Evergreen Development Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k24 grants · $37k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $124k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN PREP | $123,515 |
| DEVEREUX ADVANCED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH | $7,002 |
| FAMILIES RAISING HOPE | $5,100 |
| SAGUAROS CHILDREN'S CHARITIES INC | $3,000 |
| SARRC | $3,000 |
| THE LOVVE PROJECT | $2,768 |
| THE FOSTER ALLIANCE | $2,135 |
| FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE | $2,000 |
| WILSON SCHOOL DISTRICT | $2,000 |
| JUDI'S HOUSE | $1,727 |
| STILLPOINT FAMILY RESOURCES | $1,500 |
| THE BLACK SANTA PROJECT | $1,202 |
| FAMILY PROMISE | $1,117 |
| MILE HIGH YOUTH CORPS | $1,000 |
| ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION-VALLEY PARTNERSHIP CHARITABLE FUND | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $129k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FRFAMILIES RAISING HOPE4× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue +17%
- SASOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +57%
- VDVALLE DEL SOL INC4× · 2020–2023 · $9k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- FFFRONTLINE FOODS CO WORLD CENTRAL KITCHENone grant, 2020 · $13k
- FSFAMILY SUPPORT CENTERone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -15%
- TATHE ARVADA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK dba COMMUNITY TABLEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +39%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
To provide children and youth in arizona a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect, by creating strong and successful families.
Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.
The mission of fresh start women's foundation is to provide access and resources that help women achieve self-sufficiency and use their strength to thrive. we do this work in pursuit of our vision to create unlimited opportunities for…
Develop solutions to end hunger through food banking, public policy and innovation.
Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…
We are committed to improving and assisting the successful transition of at-risk young people to independent adulthood and supporting resilient families, by connecting them to resources.
The mission of arizona's children association is to protect children, empower youth, and strengthen families.
To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.
We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A New Leaf and the most unlike its peers is Arizona Sustainability Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 13% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILIES RAISING HOPE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Devereux Foundation ↗
- Who funds VALLE DEL SOL INC ↗
- Who funds SAGUAROS CHILDRENS CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARVADA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK dba COMMUNITY TABLE ↗
- Who funds THE FOSTER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds VALLEY PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Adams 14 Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds HOMEWARD BOUND ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF DENVER INC ↗
- Who funds The Pete C Garcia Victoria Foundation INC ↗
- Who funds MAGGIE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds Fraternal Order of Police Phoenix Lodge 2 ↗
- Who funds THE LOVVE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Arizona Sustainability Alliance ↗
- Who funds SO ALL MAY EAT INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHRISTMAS BOX INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds JUDI'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY TREE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · The Colorado Health Foundation · American Express Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Helios Education Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Garcia Family Foundation · Valley of the Sun United Way · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Evergreen Development Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Evergreen Development Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Evergreen Development Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.