Skip to content
Evenor Fund at a glance

· Private foundation

Evenor Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$250kFood & Nutrition$123kCommunity Improvement$102kEducation$100kInternational$79kHuman Services$76kAnimals$68kHealth$62kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $77k
$6,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPPER SUSITNA FOOD PANTRY$16,500
ONE BEAD PROJECT$15,000
TROUT UNLIMITED$15,000
FIT MONEY INC$10,000
ALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL INC$10,000
CHAIR-ITY INC$10,000
DENALI EDUCATION CENTER$6,500
CASCADE FISHERIES$5,000
CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC$5,000
TIN MOUNTAIN CONSERVATION CENTER$5,000
DAVIDS REFUGE$2,500
NEXTGEN ALS INC$2,500
FRIENDS OF MIKE$2,500
FOSTER THE VILLAGE INC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHAIR ITY INC: $8k → 15%CHAIR-ITY INC: $10k → 17%CHAIR ITY INC: $5k → 15%CHAIR ITY INC: $5k → 15%CHAIR ITY INC: $5k → 15%HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST: $10k → 13%HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST: $10k → 13%HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST: $10k → 13%FOSTER THE VILLAGE INC: $2k → 10%HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST: $10k → 13%HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST: $10k → 13%HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST: $10k → 13%HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST: $10k → 13%HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST: $5k → 13%CHAIR-ITY INC: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
NH
WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
VA
AZ
AR
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$831k · 20 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +98% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$831k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
-3%

Still filing today

50%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsFood & NutritionArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UPPER SUSITNA FOOD PANTRY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $123k · revenue +253%
  • HC
    HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST
    8× · 2017–2024 · $75k · revenue +34%
  • OB
    One Bead Project
    4× · 2022–2025 · $60k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • AI
    ALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION OF GREEN BAY WISCONSIN INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -79%
  • TC
    Talkeetna Community Radio Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -3%
  • HN
    HOWE NEIGHBORHOOD FAMILY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alaska Trails

Building partnerships, building trails. Working to build trails across the state and build capacity for trail organizations.

Recreation & Sports
2
Tinicum Conservancy

To protect the environment and preserve open space.

Environment
3
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
4
Cascade Climate Inc

To accelerate progress in interventions that harness Earths natural systems to stabilize the climate.

Environment
5
Glacial Lakes Conservancy Inc

Glacial Lakes Conservancy, as a land trust, is a nonprofit organization that, as part of its mission, actively works to conserve land by undertaking or assisting in land or conservation easement acquisitions.

Environment
6
Puget Sound Restoration Fund

To restore habitat, water quality and native species in the puget sound

Environment
7
Alaska Conservation Foundation

Protects alaska's unique landscapes and ways of life by supporting conservation leaders, organizations, and initiatives.

Environment
8
Upper Valley Land Trust Inc

The upper valley land trust helps people conserve land. uvlt provides conservation leadership, tools and expertise to permanently protect working farms, forested ridges, wildlife habitat, water resources, trails and scenic landscapes. see…

Environment
9
Chugach Regional Resources Commission

The Chugach Regional Resources Commission (the Commission) was established for the purpose of providing formal advocacy to manage natural resources in ways consistent with the cultural traditions of the Chugach Native people.

—
10
Tualatin Riverkeepers Inc

Tualatin riverkeepers protects, restores and expands access to the tualatin river watershed through advocacy and fostering broad community engagement.

Environment
11
Conservation Legacy

Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…

Youth Development
12
Clean Energy Transition Institute

The Clean Energy Transition Institute (CETI) is an independent, nonpartisan research and analysis nonprofit whose mission is to accelerate an equitable clean energy transition in the Northwest.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tin Mountain Conservation Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Nextgen Als Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Talkeetna Historical Society Inc: $83,000 · OtherTalkeetna Historical Society IncIndividual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTALKEETNA COMMUNITY RADIO INC: $56,000 · OtherTALKEETNA COMMUNITY RADIO INCALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL INC: $40,000 · OtherALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL INCFITMONEY INC: $40,000 · OtherFITMONEY INCALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $38,500 · OtherALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIONMERSHON CHAPTER OF TROUT UNLIMITED: $37,500 · OtherMERSHON CHAPTER OF TROUT UNLIMITEDDENALI EDUCATION CENTER: $29,500 · OtherDENALI EDUCATION CENTERFRIENDS OF MIKE: $25,000 · OtherTROUT UNLIMITED: $25,000 · OtherCURATIVE CONNECTIONS MEMORY CAFE: $22,500 · Other+12 more: $70,500 · Other+12 moreUPPER SUSITNA FOOD PANTRY: $123,000 · Food & NutritionUPPER SUSITNA F…HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST: $75,000 · Human ServicesHUDSON COMMUNI…CHAIR-ITY: $37,500 · Human ServicesCHAIR-ITY+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesOne Bead Project: $60,000 · EducationDAVID'S REFUGE INC: $22,500 · HealthNEXTGEN ALS INC: $2,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 · HealthCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC: $20,000 · EmploymentCASCADE COLUMBIA FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT GROUP: $5,000 · AnimalsTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $2,200 · Animals
Other$537,500Food & Nutrition$123,000Human Services$114,500Education$60,000Health$27,000Employment$20,000Animals$7,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUPPER SUSITNA FOOD PANTRY: $123,000 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetTalkeetna Historical Society Inc: $83,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetHUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST: $75,000 over 8y, 9.6% of budgetOne Bead Project: $60,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL INC: $40,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetFITMONEY INC: $40,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCHAIR-ITY: $37,500 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetDENALI EDUCATION CENTER: $29,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetDAVID'S REFUGE INC: $22,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION OF GREEN BAY WISCONSIN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTalkeetna Community Radio Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetNEXTGEN ALS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK GIRL VENTURES FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREI COOPERATIVE ACTION FUND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIONVILLE TAVERN PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UPPER SUSITNA FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds Talkeetna Historical Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST ↗
  • Who funds One Bead Project ↗
  • Who funds ALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FITMONEY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAIR-ITY ↗
  • Who funds DENALI EDUCATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DAVID'S REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION OF GREEN BAY WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Talkeetna Community Radio Inc ↗
  • Who funds TIN MOUNTAIN CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CASCADE COLUMBIA FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT GROUP ↗
  • Who funds NEXTGEN ALS INC ↗
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Foster the Village Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLACK GIRL VENTURES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REI COOPERATIVE ACTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIONVILLE TAVERN PRESERVATION SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alaska Community …Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Alaska Community FoundationAK12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alaska Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Evenor Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Evenor Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Evenor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home