Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Evenor Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$250kFood & Nutrition$123kCommunity Improvement$102kEducation$100kInternational$79kHuman Services$76kAnimals$68kHealth$62kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $77k
$6,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPPER SUSITNA FOOD PANTRY$16,500
ONE BEAD PROJECT$15,000
TROUT UNLIMITED$15,000
FIT MONEY INC$10,000
ALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL INC$10,000
CHAIR-ITY INC$10,000
DENALI EDUCATION CENTER$6,500
CASCADE FISHERIES$5,000
CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC$5,000
TIN MOUNTAIN CONSERVATION CENTER$5,000
DAVIDS REFUGE$2,500
NEXTGEN ALS INC$2,500
FRIENDS OF MIKE$2,500
FOSTER THE VILLAGE INC$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHAIR ITY INC: $8k → 15%CHAIR-ITY INC: $10k → 17%CHAIR ITY INC: $5k → 15%CHAIR ITY INC: $5k → 15%CHAIR ITY INC: $5k → 15%HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST: $10k → 13%HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST: $10k → 13%HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST: $10k → 13%FOSTER THE VILLAGE INC: $2k → 10%HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST: $10k → 13%HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST: $10k → 13%HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST: $10k → 13%HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST: $10k → 13%HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST: $5k → 13%CHAIR-ITY INC: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
NH
WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
VA
AZ
AR

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$831k · 20 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +98% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$831k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
-3%

Still filing today

50%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsFood & NutritionArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UPPER SUSITNA FOOD PANTRY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $123k · revenue +253%
  • HC
    HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST
    8× · 2017–2024 · $75k · revenue +34%
  • OB
    One Bead Project
    4× · 2022–2025 · $60k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • TC
    Talkeetna Community Radio Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -3%
  • HN
    HOWE NEIGHBORHOOD FAMILY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • AI
    ALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION OF GREEN BAY WISCONSIN INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -92%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alaska Trails

Building partnerships, building trails. Working to build trails across the state and build capacity for trail organizations.

Recreation & Sports
2
Tinicum Conservancy

To protect the environment and preserve open space.

Environment
3
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
4
Cascade Climate Inc

To accelerate progress in interventions that harness Earths natural systems to stabilize the climate.

Environment
5
Glacial Lakes Conservancy Inc

Glacial Lakes Conservancy, as a land trust, is a nonprofit organization that, as part of its mission, actively works to conserve land by undertaking or assisting in land or conservation easement acquisitions.

Environment
6
Puget Sound Restoration Fund

To restore habitat, water quality and native species in the puget sound

Environment
7
Alaska Conservation Foundation

Protects alaska's unique landscapes and ways of life by supporting conservation leaders, organizations, and initiatives.

Environment
8
Upper Valley Land Trust Inc

The upper valley land trust helps people conserve land. uvlt provides conservation leadership, tools and expertise to permanently protect working farms, forested ridges, wildlife habitat, water resources, trails and scenic landscapes. see…

Environment
9
Chugach Regional Resources Commission

The Chugach Regional Resources Commission (the Commission) was established for the purpose of providing formal advocacy to manage natural resources in ways consistent with the cultural traditions of the Chugach Native people.

10
Tualatin Riverkeepers Inc

Tualatin riverkeepers protects, restores and expands access to the tualatin river watershed through advocacy and fostering broad community engagement.

Environment
11
Conservation Legacy

Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…

Youth Development
12
Clean Energy Transition Institute

The Clean Energy Transition Institute (CETI) is an independent, nonpartisan research and analysis nonprofit whose mission is to accelerate an equitable clean energy transition in the Northwest.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tin Mountain Conservation Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nextgen Als Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%38%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%65%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%10%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,543

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Talkeetna Historical Society Inc — $83,000 · OtherTalkeetna Historical Society IncIndividual grant recipient — $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTALKEETNA COMMUNITY RADIO INC — $56,000 · OtherTALKEETNA COMMUNITY RADIO INCALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL INC — $40,000 · OtherALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL INCFITMONEY INC — $40,000 · OtherFITMONEY INCALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $38,500 · OtherALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIONMERSHON CHAPTER OF TROUT UNLIMITED — $37,500 · OtherMERSHON CHAPTER OF TROUT UNLIMITEDDENALI EDUCATION CENTER — $29,500 · OtherDENALI EDUCATION CENTERTROUT UNLIMITED — $25,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF MIKE — $25,000 · OtherCURATIVE CONNECTIONS MEMORY CAFE — $22,500 · Other+12 more — $70,500 · Other+12 moreUPPER SUSITNA FOOD PANTRY — $123,000 · Food & NutritionUPPER SUSITNA F…HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST — $75,000 · Human ServicesHUDSON COMMUNI…CHAIR-ITY — $37,500 · Human ServicesCHAIR-ITY+1 more — $2,000 · Human ServicesOne Bead Project — $60,000 · EducationDAVID'S REFUGE INC — $22,500 · HealthNEXTGEN ALS INC — $2,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 · HealthCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC — $20,000 · EmploymentCASCADE COLUMBIA FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT GROUP — $5,000 · AnimalsTROUT UNLIMITED INC — $2,200 · Animals
Other$537,500Food & Nutrition$123,000Human Services$114,500Education$60,000Health$27,000Employment$20,000Animals$7,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUPPER SUSITNA FOOD PANTRY — $123,000 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetTalkeetna Historical Society Inc — $83,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetHUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST — $75,000 over 8y, 9.6% of budgetOne Bead Project — $60,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL INC — $40,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetFITMONEY INC — $40,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCHAIR-ITY — $37,500 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetDENALI EDUCATION CENTER — $29,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetDAVID'S REFUGE INC — $22,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTalkeetna Community Radio Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION OF GREEN BAY WISCONSIN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC — $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREI COOPERATIVE ACTION FUND — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK GIRL VENTURES FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIONVILLE TAVERN PRESERVATION SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UPPER SUSITNA FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds Talkeetna Historical Society Inc
  • Who funds HUDSON COMMUNITY FIRST
  • Who funds One Bead Project
  • Who funds ALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds FITMONEY INC
  • Who funds CHAIR-ITY
  • Who funds DENALI EDUCATION CENTER
  • Who funds DAVID'S REFUGE INC
  • Who funds CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC
  • Who funds Talkeetna Community Radio Inc
  • Who funds ALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION OF GREEN BAY WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds CASCADE COLUMBIA FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT GROUP
  • Who funds TIN MOUNTAIN CONSERVATION CENTER INC
  • Who funds NEXTGEN ALS INC
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC
  • Who funds REI COOPERATIVE ACTION FUND
  • Who funds Foster the Village Inc
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds BLACK GIRL VENTURES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE UNIONVILLE TAVERN PRESERVATION SOCIETY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alaska Community FoundationAK12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alaska Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Evenor Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph