Skip to content

· Private foundation

Evelyn and Norman Feintech Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$568k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.5MHealth$1.0MPhilanthropy$965kEducation$710kFood & Nutrition$631kHuman Services$336kInternational$284kReligion$110kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $430k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER$150,000
COLLEGE TRACK$70,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$60,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$50,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$50,000
ODC$50,000
ZERO TO THREE$25,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LA$20,000
LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC$15,000
PROJECT ANGEL FOOD$15,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA$10,000
UNION RESCUE MISSION$10,000
INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH SPIRITUALITY$10,000
JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $260k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $25k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $25k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $25k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $25k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $25k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $25k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $25k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.7M · 28 repeat orgs$128k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against -34% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
8

Total granted

$5.7M
$128k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
-34%

Still filing today

61%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationInternationalHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +21%
  • CT
    COLLEGE TRACK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $710k · revenue +190%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $461k · revenue +315%

Funded once

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD
    one grant, 2017 · $60k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $13k
  • TU
    THE UNITED STAES HOLOCAUST MUSEUM
    one grant, 2018 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
4
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
5
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
6
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
7
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
8
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
9
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
11
The Jewish Women's Archive Inc

The jewish women's archive documents jewish women's stories, elevates their voices, and inspires them to be agents of change.jwa is dedicated to expanding and transforming the historical narrative by restoring jewish women and gender…

Arts & Culture
12
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Zero to Three National Center for Infants Toddlers and Families. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ODC: $855,000 · OtherODCLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $460,500 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $150,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITALJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LA: $126,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LAJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE: $80,000 · OtherTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $80,000 · Other+15 more: $470,000 · Other+15 moreSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $1,200,000 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTERLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $157,657 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC AS…LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION: $55,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $20,000 · Arts & CulturePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $400,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD…Children's Hospital Los Angeles: $300,000 · HealthChildren's Hospita…PROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $170,000 · HealthPROJECT ANGEL FOODPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $80,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD…COLLEGE TRACK: $710,000 · EducationCOLLEGE TRACKJEWISH WORLD WATCH: $108,000 · EducationJEWISH WORLD WA…+1 more: $10,000 · EducationZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES: $175,000 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MISSION: $85,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $126,000 · InternationalSurvivor Mitzvah Project: $28,800 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $21,600 · InternationalHOPEWELL FUND: $100,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,221,500Arts & Culture$1,432,657Health$950,000Education$828,000Human Services$260,000International$176,400Philanthropy$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $1,200,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetCOLLEGE TRACK: $710,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $460,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $400,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $300,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES: $175,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $170,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $157,657 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $126,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH WORLD WATCH: $108,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $85,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $80,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $80,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JEWISH SPIRITUALITY INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION: $55,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSurvivor Mitzvah Project: $28,800 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $21,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEXTGEN CLIMATE AMERICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetICIVICS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE TRACK ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ANGEL FOOD ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH WORLD WATCH ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH SPIRITUALITY INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Survivor Mitzvah Project ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds NEXTGEN CLIMATE AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ICIVICS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · National Philanthropic Trust · California Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Evelyn and Norman Feintech Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Evelyn and Norman Feintech Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Icivics Inc: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Evelyn and Norman Feintech Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Evelyn and Norman Feintech Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Evelyn and Norman Feintech Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph