Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ethel-Jane W Bunting Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Civil Rights$38kEducation$27kCommunity Improvement$23kArts & Culture$19kScience & Tech$18kRecreation & Sports$18kHealth$13kReligion$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$277k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MI GOO NI DI INSTITUTE$10,000
SAR (SCHOOL FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH)$5,000
HOT SPRINGS DEVELOPMENT FDN$3,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LINCOLN COUNTY$2,500
RUIDOSO DOWNS CHAPLAINCY BENEVOLENT ACCT$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
MISSION MULES$2,000
QUEEN CREEK HIGH SCOOL WRESTLING BOOSTERS$1,500
QCJRA$500
THE HUMMINGBIRD PROJECT$500
COWBOYS FOR CANCER RESEARCH$500
NEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER$350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CORRALES COMMUNITY EDUCATION: $3k → 10%THE HUMMINGBIRD PROJECT: $1k → 9%CORRALES COMMUNITY EDUCATION: $2k → 10%THE HUMMINGBIRD PROJECT: $500 → 9%CORRALES COMMUNITY EDUCATION: $1k → 10%THE HUMMINGBIRD PROJECT: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MN
CT
AZ
NM
AR
NC
SC
LA
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$186k · 21 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
13

Total granted

$186k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
0%

Still filing today

43%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CK
    COWBOYS & KIDS INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $8k · revenue +224%
  • NM
    New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc
    4× · 2019–2022 · $6k · revenue +155%
  • AJ
    ARIZONA JUNIOR RODEO ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $6k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • ST
    SAN TAN YOUTH FOOTBALL LEAGUE
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • UC
    United Cajun Navy
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
  • WT
    Wine to Water
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Mexico Military Museum Foundation I

The New Mexico Military Museum Foundation, Inc. is a fundraising foundation which supports the operations of the New Mexico Military Museum.

Arts & Culture
2
Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum

We inspire people to live in harmony with the natural world by fostering love, appreciation, and understanding of the sonoran desert.

Arts & Culture
3
New Mexico Confederate Historical Society Inc

It is the mission of this society to promote through education, monuments, historical panels, maps and re-enactments the history of the war between the states (the civil war) as these events took place in and around new mexico and the…

—
4
Corrales Historical Society

Promoting history of centuries-old agricultural village

—
5
Carrizo Comecrudo Nation of Texas Inc

Ongoing Cultural Events youth programs and protests for sacred land protections disaster recovery for multiple tribes

—
6
Cortez Center Inc Dba Cortez Cultural Center

The mission of the Cortez Cultural Center is to provide programs that enrich the lives of our community and its visitors by increasing cultural awareness, promoting the arts, and educating about the area's history, diversity and natural…

—
7
Recursos de Santa Fe

Shows the culture of the American southwest

Arts & Culture
8
The Helene Wurlitzer Foundation of New Mexico
—
9
New Mexico Acequia Association

To protect new mexico's water and acequias, grow healthy food for local families and communities, and to honor new mexico's cultural heritage.

Environment
10
Nm Committee of the National Museum of Women in the Arts

As part of the network of national chapters, the new mexico committee of the national museum of women in the arts enhances the mission of the national museum of women in the arts bringing recognition to the achievements of women artists by…

Philanthropy
11
Santa Fe Friends of Traditional Music Dba Santa Fe TradFest

The mission of Santa Fe Friends of Traditional Music is to celebrate & strengthen traditional music and folk arts in New Mexico, through an annual festival and other opportunities to play, hear, and appreciate traditional music in New…

Arts & Culture
12
Museo Eduardo Carrillo
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Wildlife Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
8/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CEAR: $37,500 · OtherCEARHOT SPRINGS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $22,930 · OtherHOT SPRINGS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATIONSCHOOL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH: $18,000 · OtherSCHOOL OF ADVANCED RESEARCHMI-GOO-NI-DI INSTITUTE INC: $17,000 · OtherMI-GOO-NI-DI INSTITUTE INCIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRUIDOSO DOWNS CHAPLAINCY BENEVOLENT ACCT: $9,500 · OtherRUIDOSO DOWNS CHAPLAINCY BENEVOLENT ACCTQUEEN CREEK HIGH SCOOL WRESTLING BOOSTERS: $9,500 · OtherQUEEN CREEK HIGH SCOOL WRESTLING BOOSTERS+20 more: $31,250 · Other+20 moreCOWBOYS & KIDS INC: $8,400 · EducationNew Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc: $6,000 · EducationNew Mexico Association for the Education of Young Children: $500 · EducationCOWBOYS FOR CANCER RESEARCH INC: $10,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NEW MEXICO: $500 · HealthCORRALES COMMUNITY EDUCATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE HUMMINGBIRD PROJECT Company: $2,250 · Human ServicesSCHOOL FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH: $7,000 · Social ScienceARIZONA JUNIOR RODEO ASSOCIATION INC: $5,500 · Food & NutritionUnited Cajun Navy: $2,500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$158,180Education$14,900Health$10,500Human Services$7,250Social Science$7,000Food & Nutrition$5,500Public Safety & Disaster$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOT SPRINGS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $22,930 over 7y, 12% of budgetMI-GOO-NI-DI INSTITUTE INC: $17,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetCOWBOYS FOR CANCER RESEARCH INC: $10,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetCOWBOYS & KIDS INC: $8,400 over 2y, 15% of budgetSCHOOL FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNew Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA JUNIOR RODEO ASSOCIATION INC: $5,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCORRALES COMMUNITY EDUCATION: $5,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetNEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $4,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUnited Cajun Navy: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LINCOLN COUNTY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWine to Water: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMMINGBIRD PROJECT Company: $2,250 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Charleston Museum: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONFEDERATE HOME AND COLLEGE: $750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNew Mexico Association for the Education of Young Children: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NEW MEXICO: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOT SPRINGS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MI-GOO-NI-DI INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds COWBOYS FOR CANCER RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds COWBOYS & KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA JUNIOR RODEO ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CORRALES COMMUNITY EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN TAN YOUTH FOOTBALL LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds United Cajun Navy ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LINCOLN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Wine to Water ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMMINGBIRD PROJECT Company ↗
  • Who funds BELOVED ASHEVILLE ↗
  • Who funds The Charleston Museum ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds CONFEDERATE HOME AND COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds New Mexico Association for the Education of Young Children ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NEW MEXICO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albuquerque Community FoundationNM15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ethel-Jane W Bunting Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ethel-Jane W Bunting Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ethel-Jane W Bunting Foundation Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Ethel-Jane W Bunting Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ethel-Jane W Bunting’s filings →

    More from the funding graph