· Private foundation
Er Campbell Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $432k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LSU FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| BAYSIDE ACADEMY | $110,000 |
| TIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION | $71,840 |
| ALABAMA MEDIA FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| THE BRINTON MUSEUM | $25,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVATORY | $20,000 |
| ALABAMA WILDFIRE FEDERATION | $20,000 |
| UMS-WRIGHT PREPATORY SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| CADDO LAKE INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| POLO PLAYERS SUPPORT GROUP | $9,500 |
| TRINITY CHARGER ALLIANCE | $5,000 |
| LOUISIANA FIRST FUND | $5,000 |
| FRIENDS OF FAIRHOPE POLICE DEPARTMENT | $5,000 |
| DOWNTOWN SHERIDAN ASSOCATION | $3,100 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $280k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION4× · 2020–2025 · $622k · revenue +232%
- BABAYSIDE ACADEMY INC3× · 2022–2025 · $335k · revenue +44%
- TNTHE NEW MUSEUM AT THE BRADFORD BRINTON RANCH2× · 2023–2025 · $35k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- GSGREATER SHREVEPORT CHAMBER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -57% · 31% of their budget
- COCITY OF SHREVEPORTone grant, 2017 · $10k
- SHSHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENone grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To strengthen the association of former students, promote the interests and welfare of texas a&m university, perpetuate ties of affection and esteem formed in university or college days, and serve the student body.
To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
The baylor oral health foundation was established to foster and support the activities and program of the texas a&m university college of dentistry (the college) to provide financial support for excellence at the college, and to advance…
Deep south today is a nonprofit network of local newsrooms comprising mississippi today and verite news. with its regional scale and scope, deep south today is providing critical journalism in underserved areas and ensuring its long-term…
To build relationships with alumni and friends in order to secure private funds and other resources for the benefit of the university of southern mississippi (usm). the foundation receives, invests and distributes private gifts in support…
The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.
The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…
To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.
Provide post-secondary education of excellence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lsu Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Tom Harrison Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BAYSIDE ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER SHREVEPORT CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LSU FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA MEDIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE NEW MUSEUM AT THE BRADFORD BRINTON RANCH ↗
- Who funds CADDO LAKE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Polo Players Support Group Inc ↗
- Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN SHERIDAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FUZZY FRIENDS RESCUE ↗
- Who funds JACKET PRIDE INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds INFIRMARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Tom Harrison Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds College Golf Fellowship ↗
- Who funds THE ARC CADDO-BOSSIER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BIG HORN EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Louisiana · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Er Campbell Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Er Campbell Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Er Campbell Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.