Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Equity Residential Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$163k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Community Improvement$300kEmployment$255kEducation$146kFood & Nutrition$143kHousing & Shelter$121kHealth$116kPublic Safety & Disaster$87kCrime & Legal$59kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $145k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mercy Housing California$40,000
Ferguson Charitable Foundation$25,000
Innovation Network for Communities$20,000
Christ the King Jesuit College Preparatory School$15,000
Genesys Works Chicago$15,000
Emergency Network Los Angeles Inc$10,000
World Central Kitchen Inc$10,000
California Community Foundation$10,000
Pancreatic Cancer Action Network$5,000
American Red Cross$5,000
Misericordia Foundation$2,500
Cameron Boyce Foundation$2,500
Mercy Housing Lakefront$2,500
Common Pantry$400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Pine Street Inn: $10k → 16%Downtown Women's Center: $20k → 14%Care for Friends: $3k → 14%Pine Street Inn: $5k → 16%Denver Rescue Mission: $5k → 12%Covenant House New Jersey: $500 → 16%Misericordia Foundation: $3k → 14%American Red Cross: $38k → 14%American Red Cross: $12k → 14%American Red Cross: $5k → 14%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of Equity Residential Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Equity Residential Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$950k · 19 repeat orgs$470k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
52

Total granted

$950k
$375k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+28%

Still filing today

89%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IN
    INNOVATION NETWORK FOR COMMUNITIES INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $195k · revenue +97%
  • FC
    FERGUSON CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +112%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • NF
    NAREIT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -81%
  • EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2020 · $31k · revenue -63%
  • DW
    DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

2
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
3
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
Housing Works

Our mission is to create housing and service options that model, with respect and dignity, sustainable, environmentally sensitive, affordable communities for people of limited resources.

Housing & Shelter
5
California Healthcare Foundation

Chcf is dedicated to advancing meaningful, measurable improvements in the way the health care delivery system provides care to the people of california, particularly those with low incomes and those whose needs are not well served by the…

6
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank

The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. to fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition…

7
Hollywood Food Coalition

Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…

8
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
9
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
10
Center for Housing and Health

Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
11
West Side Center for Community Life

To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…

Youth Development
12
Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families Forward and the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Cancer Support ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Animal Rescue and ShelterCommunity College Foundatio…Youth Development CentersYouth Sports ProgramsSchool District FoundationsLgbtq+ Community SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Policy Research and AdvocacyFood Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%41%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%7%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%17%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/72
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,493

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
69/70
Grantees still filing
45/70
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NAA Education Institute — $200,000 · OtherNAA Education InstituteOVER THE RAINBOW ASSOCIATION — $50,000 · OtherOVER THE RAINBOW ASSOCIATIONHISPANIC ALLIANCE FOR CAREER ENHANCEMENT — $40,000 · OtherHISPANIC ALLIANCE FOR CAREER ENHANCEMENTMERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA — $40,000 · OtherMERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIANorthwestern University — $40,000 · OtherNorthwestern University+45 more — $287,558 · Other+45 moreINNOVATION NETWORK FOR COMMUNITIES INC — $195,000 · Community ImprovementINNOVATION NETWORK FOR …NAREIT FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Community ImprovementNAREIT FOUNDATIONAscend Foundation Inc — $40,000 · Community ImprovementAscend Foundation IncCHICAGO CARES INC — $10,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $5,000 · Community ImprovementFERGUSON CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $75,000 · EducationFERGUSON …DEPAUL UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · EducationDEPAUL UN…LINK Unlimited Scholars — $10,000 · EducationLINK Unli…THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · EducationTHE POSSE…FUTURE FOUNDERS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $69,534 · Food & NutritionGREATER C…GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC — $18,500 · Food & NutritionGOLDEN HA…PROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC — $15,500 · Food & NutritionPROJECT B…CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $5,000 · Food & NutritionNOURISHNJ INC — $5,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $5,000 · Food & NutritionAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $56,955 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER — $20,000 · Human ServicesPINE STREET INN INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesDENVER RESCUE MISSION — $5,000 · Human Services+3 more — $5,500 · Human ServicesTREVOR PROJECT INC — $40,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $31,299 · Civil RightsHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Civil RightsPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $25,000 · HealthEMERGENCY NETWORK LOS ANGELES INC — $10,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthCAMERON BOYCE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $5,661 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $5,000 · Health+1 more — $430 · Health
Other$657,558Community Improvement$300,000Education$120,000Food & Nutrition$118,534Human Services$102,455Civil Rights$81,299Health$66,091

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINNOVATION NETWORK FOR COMMUNITIES INC — $195,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetFERGUSON CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $69,534 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $56,955 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOVER THE RAINBOW ASSOCIATION — $50,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetNAREIT FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $40,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHISPANIC ALLIANCE FOR CAREER ENHANCEMENT — $40,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetAscend Foundation Inc — $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $31,299 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS FOR SAFETY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHRIGHT 360 — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC — $18,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC — $15,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $11,547 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY NETWORK LOS ANGELES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO CARES INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLINK Unlimited Scholars — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBUILD INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMERON BOYCE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING INDUSTRY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WEST END MUSEUM INCORPORATED — $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetHOMELESS PERSONS REPRESENTATION PROJECT INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $5,661 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFUTURE FOUNDERS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetESSEX FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES FORWARD — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENTRYWAY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARPENTER'S SHELTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL14.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Greater Chicago Food Depository · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Wells Fargo Foundation · California Community Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Equity Residential Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 27%
  • The West End Museum Incorporated65% of income from government
  • Covenant House New Jersey Inc34% of income from government
  • Nourishnj Inc27% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc11% of income from government
  • Seton Hall University1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Equity Residential Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Equity Residential Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph