Skip to content
Enterprise Holdings Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Enterprise Holdings Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$73M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9,499
Grants FY2024still arriving
52
States reached
$6.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Enterprise Holdings Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Charities Aid Foundation America, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Enterprise Holdings Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5770 organizations, $73M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

3265
’20
4029
’21
5121
’22
5275
’23
5770
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$105MEducation$48MHealth$45MFood & Nutrition$43MEnvironment$37MHuman Services$33MPhilanthropy$26MYouth Development$24MOther$0
02FY2024 · 9499 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8053 grants · $24M
  • $10k–50k1394 grants · $23M
  • $50k–250k36 grants · $2.5M
  • $250k+16 grants · $24M
$3,000
Median grant
52
States reached
$594M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Nature Conservancy$6,000,000
Feeding America$3,500,000
United Way of Greater St Louis$2,722,379
National Arbor Day Foundation$1,520,124
Global Foodbanking Network$1,497,375
Charities Aid Foundation America$1,309,216
Fisher House Foundation$1,000,000
UNCF$1,000,000
My Brother's Keeper Alliance$1,000,000
American Red Cross$1,000,000
Parents as Teachers National Center Inc$1,000,000
Girls Inc$1,000,000
ST LOUIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$500,000
Ranken Technical College$437,500
American National Red Cross$250,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $18.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHARITY CARS: $73k → 11%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $6.0M → 11%SHAWANO AREA MATTHEW 25 INC: $500k → 11%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $40k → 5%CHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINO: $71k → 16%US VETS: $48k → 11%COLLABORATIVE FOR CHILDREN: $41k → 16%KINGSLEY HOUSE: $51k → 23%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $50k → 7%COLLABORATIVE FOR CHILDREN: $41k → 16%ONE HEART FAMILIY MINISTRIES: $50k → 11%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAND AND: $40k → 7%KINGSLEY HOUSE: $40k → 23%ACTIVE HEROES: $165k → 15%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $48k → 7%FOSTER ADOPT CONNECT INC: $46k → 15%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $48k → 7%American Red Cross: $250k → 14%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $46k → 7%BERTS BIG ADVENTURE: $64k → 8%COLLABORATIVE FOR CHILDREN: $41k → 16%COLUMBIA URBAN LEAGUE: $40k → 16%THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%URBAN LEAGUE OF KANSAS CITY MO: $41k → 15%CHRIS 180 INC: $60k → 14%NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $50k → 13%CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $40k → 16%US VETS: $48k → 16%TWEF INTERNATIONAL INC: $41k → 16%LEAD INC: $100k → 13%American National Red Cross: $1.0M → 14%American National Red Cross: $1.0M → 14%American National Red Cross: $1.0M → 14%American Red Cross: $1.0M → 14%IRVING CARES: $40k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $1.0M → 14%American National Red Cross: $250k → 14%International Institute of Metropolitan St Louis: $150k → 21%American National Red Cross: $250k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $100k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $100k → 14%American National Red Cross: $100k → 14%American National Red Cross: $250k → 11%American National Red Cross: $100k → 14%American National Red Cross: $60k → 14%Gateway Region YMCA: $500k → 21%MERS Missouri Goodwill Industries: $125k → 21%FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $50k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$216M · 1783 repeat orgs$24M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

1783 repeat relationships: 1546 still active in FY2024, 237 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1783
167

Total granted

$216M
$23M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+22%

Still filing today

77%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Feeding America
    5× · 2020–2024 · $13M · revenue +40%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $7.8M · revenue +33%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2020–2024 · $6.9M · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2.5M · revenue -10%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE CLEVELAND CLINIC
    one grant, 2020 · $2.5M
  • MB
    My Brother's Keeper
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma City University

Oklahoma city university prepares all learners to create, lead and serve.

Education
2
Augustana College

Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.

Education
3
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals... feeding san diego is on a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community…

Food & Nutrition
4
University of New Haven

See schedule ouniversity of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.

Education
5
Global Fund for Children

To advance the rights and opportunities of children and youth worldwide.

Arts & Culture
6
Fielding Graduate University

Fielding provides doctoral, master's and graduate-level certificate programs in the fields of educational leadership, organization development, and psychology.

—
7
The University of Toledo Foundation

Aligning donor passion and generosity to advance the university of toledo through fundraising, stewardship, and prudent asset management to provide scholarship opportunities for students, tier one athletic programs, education events…

Education
8
Furman University

Furman university is an institution of higher education providing distinctive undergraduate education emphasizing an engaged approach combining classroom learning with real world experiences and self-discovery.

Education
9
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
10
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
11
Salus University

Advancing integrated health care through innovative education, research and clinical services

—
12
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Techforce Foundation; the most unlike its peers is La Clinica Tepeyac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

1480 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1480 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

35
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
290
Early backer (in before they grew)
1459/1480
Grantees still filing
1073/1480
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $102,988,393 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICAUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $6,766,134 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC+21 more: $7,562,847 · Philanthropy+21 moreThe Nature Conservancy: $18,006,000 · OtherThe Nature ConservancyTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $6,011,500 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $4,126,500 · OtherCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $4,012,000 · OtherUnited Way: $3,655,373 · OtherThe Global FoodBanking Network: $5,792,705 · OtherThe Global FoodBanking Network+82 more: $38,809,816 · Other+82 moreFeeding America: $13,005,500 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $600,750 · Food & Nutrition+20 more: $4,324,588 · Food & NutritionAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $6,859,500 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $6,017,000 · Human Services+21 more: $4,418,098 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $7,820,030 · EnvironmentTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $2,500,000 · EnvironmentBONNEVILLE ENVIRONMENTAL FOUNDATION: $581,727 · Environment+3 more: $701,000 · EnvironmentUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $4,683,083 · EducationRanken Technical College: $1,861,000 · EducationSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $561,000 · EducationSAM HOUSTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $499,000 · Education+16 more: $3,112,631 · EducationPARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC: $4,000,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,007,518 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $997,712 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $548,584 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $382,876 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $381,164 · HealthCHAMPIONS OF THE COMMUNITY INC: $380,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $342,335 · Health+10 more: $1,988,575 · Health
Philanthropy$117,317,374Other$80,413,894Food & Nutrition$17,930,838Human Services$17,294,598Environment$11,602,757Education$10,716,714Health$10,028,764

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $102,988,393 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetFeeding America: $13,005,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $7,820,030 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $6,859,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $6,766,134 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $6,017,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $6,011,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetThe Global FoodBanking Network: $5,792,705 over 5y, 11% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $4,683,083 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $4,126,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $4,012,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetPARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC: $4,000,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $2,500,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $2,177,070 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetST LOUIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2,038,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetRanken Technical College: $1,861,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetUNITED WAY INC: $1,316,966 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,007,518 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS INC: $1,003,500 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $997,712 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN WV INC: $932,175 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetA MILLION STARS INC DBA COLLEGE BOUND: $629,512 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $600,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBONNEVILLE ENVIRONMENTAL FOUNDATION: $581,727 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $561,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $548,584 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $531,565 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $529,658 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSHAWANO AREA MATTHEW 25 INC: $504,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSAM HOUSTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $499,000 over 1y, 96% of budgetCASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL KENTUCKY INC: $441,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC: $439,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $420,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY INC: $420,367 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $382,876 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $381,164 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetST LOUIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $380,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetCHAMPIONS OF THE COMMUNITY INC: $380,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $342,335 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $340,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $329,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $326,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $321,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF JENNINGS DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $284,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $281,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $274,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH: $273,800 over 5y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds The Global FoodBanking Network ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Ranken Technical College ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN WV INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Tom Joyner Foundation…Feeding AmericaPott FoundationTsfJordan Mary R & Ettie…Graybar FoundationBerges Family Foundat…Marni & Morris Propp …The Crawford Taylor F…Brown Dana Charitable…Siemer InstituteUnited Negro College …
Tom Joyner Foundation IncTX39.3× affinity44 shared granteesties to 2 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tom Joyner Foundation Inc · Feeding America · Pott Foundation · Tsf · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Graybar Foundation · Berges Family Foundation · Marni & Morris Propp II Family Foundation Inc · The Crawford Taylor Foundation · Brown Dana Charitable Trust · Siemer Institute · United Negro College Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Enterprise Holdings Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Enterprise Holdings Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Bonneville Environmental Foundation: 100% of income from government
  • The Mass Mentoring Partnership Inc: 63% of income from government
  • Urban League of Broward County Inc: 44% of income from government
  • Food Bank of South Jersey Inc: 30% of income from government
  • United Way of Broward County Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc: 26% of income from government
  • United Way of the Columbia-Willamette: 25% of income from government
  • United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida: 6% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc: 2% of income from government
  • United Way Suncoast Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The United Way of Lee County Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Monmouth University Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Bottom Line Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
73report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Enterprise Holdings Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Enterprise Holdings Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Enterprise Holdings’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home