Skip to content
Enoch Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Enoch Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$24MInternational$4.5MFood & Nutrition$2.0MReligion$812kHuman Services$264kAnimals$2k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $580k
  • $250k+7 grants · $4.0M
$325,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$149M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANT WITH PURPOSE$1,000,000
ASSEMBLIES OF GOD CHURCH$725,000
WATER FOR GOOD$695,000
LIFENET INTERNATIONAL$512,266
ZEO EMPOWERS$389,393
CURE INTERNATIONAL$374,000
WATER4$325,000
WORLD RELIEF$236,000
THE INSTITUTE FOR SURVIVOR CARE$198,792
AXIS$80,000
ASONE MINISTRIES$65,000
COMMUNIO$6,500
REFUGE FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $530k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WATER4: $325k → 16%COMMUNIO: $7k → 6%THE INSTITUTE FOR SURVIVOR CARE: $199k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
SD
OH
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AR
NC
DC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
2
Lifewater Inc

Lifewater international is a non-profit christian water development organization dedicated to effectively serving vulnerable children and families by partnering with underserved communities to overcome water poverty.

Environment
3
Compassion International Incorporated

Compassion exists to release children from poverty in Jesus' name. Compassion serves all children, regardless of religion, race, ethnicity, or gender.

International
4
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
5
Empowering Lives International

Empowering Lives International (ELI) ignites world changers. We equip families and orphans to crush poverty, embrace Christ, and share their transformation with others through their God-honoring income, their deepening relationship with…

Religion
6
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
7
Amazi Water

Vision to support east africa, specifically burundi, to serve the poor and needy through water wells and development support especially in partnership with churches in the region.

International
8
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
9
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
10
Living Water International

Living Water International ("Living Water") exists to demonstrate the love of God by helping communities in 17 developing countries acquire desperately needed clean water and to experience "living water" - the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Human Services
11
Redeem International

Redeem's mission is to protect widows and orphans from violent abuse and exploitation.

International
12
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope; the most unlike its peers is WATER4 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $23,667,840 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION+1 more: $361,143 · PhilanthropyCONVOY OF HOPE: $2,000,000 · InternationalCONVOY OF HOPECURE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,674,625 · InternationalCURE INTERNATIONAL INCFLORESTA USA INCORPORATED: $1,000,000 · InternationalFLORESTA USA INCORPORAT…WATER FOR GOOD: $695,000 · InternationalWATER FOR GOODLIFENET INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION: $512,266 · InternationalLIFENET INTERNATIONAL C…Zoe Empowers: $389,393 · InternationalZoe EmpowersWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $236,000 · InternationalASSEMBLIES OF GOD CHURCH: $725,000 · Other+1 more: $2,000 · OtherWATER4 INC: $325,000 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE FOR SURVIVOR CARE INC: $198,792 · Human ServicesAsOne Ministries: $65,000 · Human Services+1 more: $6,500 · Human ServicesAXIS: $80,000 · Education
Philanthropy$24,028,983International$6,507,284Other$727,000Human Services$595,292Education$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $23,667,840 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCURE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,674,625 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetFLORESTA USA INCORPORATED: $1,000,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetWATER FOR GOOD: $695,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetLIFENET INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION: $512,266 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetZoe Empowers: $389,393 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $361,143 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWATER4 INC: $325,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $236,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SURVIVOR CARE INC: $198,792 over 1y, 21% of budgetAXIS: $80,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAsOne Ministries: $65,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCOMMUNIO FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dovetail Impact Found…Christian Community F…Greater Houston Commu…Servant FoundationNatl Christian Charit…The Signatry Charitab…National Philanthropi…Charities Aid Foundat…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…The Blackbaud Giving …Donor Advised Charita…
Dovetail Impact Foundation (Fka David Weekley Family Foundation)TX17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dovetail Impact Foundation (Fka David Weekley Family Foundation) · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Enoch Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Enoch Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Enoch Trust?

Find your warmest path to Enoch Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Enoch’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home