Skip to content

· Private foundation

Engler Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$370k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$889kPhilanthropy$363kHuman Services$335kEducation$297kArts & Culture$130kYouth Development$50kAnimals$36kRecreation & Sports$27kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $315k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$94k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHBURN CENTER FOR CHILDREN$55,000
RECLAIM$45,000
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE MPLS$40,000
TASKS UNLIMITED$40,000
TOUCHSTONE MENTAL HEALTH$40,000
PEOPLE INCORPORATED$40,000
THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP$40,000
NAMI - MN$35,000
JUXTAPOSITION ARTS$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $315k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%TOUCHSTONE MENTAL HEALTH: $40k → 11%TOUCHSTONE MENTAL HEALTH: $35k → 11%TOUCHSTONE MENTAL HEALTH: $35k → 11%TOUCHSTONE MENTAL HEALTH: $35k → 11%TOUCHSTONE MENTAL HEALTH: $35k → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $30k → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $30k → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $40k → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $35k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
MN
WI
MI
MA
WY
OH
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
AZ
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Engler Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in MN; by stated purpose, 88%.

Engler Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 14 repeat orgs$343k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
34

Total granted

$1.7M
$343k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+21%

Still filing today

79%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    TOUCHSTONE MENTAL HEALTH
    5× · 2021–2025 · $180k · revenue +15%
  • WC
    Washburn Center for Children
    5× · 2021–2025 · $175k · revenue +31%
  • PI
    PEOPLE INCORPORATED
    4× · 2022–2025 · $150k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • MJ
    MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • DF
    Dogs For Our Brave Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue +59%
  • PI
    PEOPLE INCORPORATD
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
Central Minnesota Jobs and Training Services Inc

Strengthen central mn communities through leadership in workforce excellence.

—
3
Minnesota Institute for Talented Youth

Mity's mission is to inspire and challenge intellectually curious students to pursue their passions within a diverse, inclusive community and empower them by building skills and relationships for lifelong success.

—
4
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
5
Mentoring Partnership of Minnesota

Mentoring partnership of minnesota (mpm) builds and elevates the capacity of programs, systems and policies to strengthen youth mentoring relationships. strategic priorities include: 1. support a statewide mentoring partner network2.…

Employment
6
Teamability Inc

Teamability strives to ensure that children with severe multiple disabilities have the opportunity to benefit from therapeautic educational intervention to participate actively in life.

Education
7
Planned Parenthood Minnesota North Dakota South Dakota

Affirming human rights to reproductive health and freedom.

Health
8
Families Rising

To amplify the voices of those with lived experience, support adoptive, foster, and kinship families, educate child welfare professionals, and champion the well-being of children and families. whether you are seeking guidance or working to…

Human Services
9
Serveminnesota

To strengthen minnesota through high-impact service.

Community Improvement
10
2020 Mom Policy Center for Maternal

The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…

Health
11
Minnesota Education Equity Partnership

To transform systems, structures and public narratives to advance race equity and excellence in education.

Housing & Shelter
12
Advocating Change Together

Advocating change together's (act) mission is to advance "self advocacy" which, as its name suggests, engages people with developmental disabilities to be in charge of their own decisions and to speak for themselves. act describes…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Family Partnership; the most unlike its peers is American Educational Assistance Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE MPLS: $175,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE MPLSTASKS UNLIMITED: $175,000 · OtherTASKS UNLIMITEDPEOPLE INCORPORATED: $150,000 · OtherPEOPLE INCORPORATEDNAMI - MN: $150,000 · OtherNAMI - MNMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FOUNDATIONFRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY: $45,000 · Other+32 more: $188,735 · Other+32 moreRECLAIM: $180,000 · HealthRECLAIMWashburn Center for Children: $175,000 · HealthWashburn Center fo…PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES: $20,000 · HealthTOUCHSTONE MENTAL HEALTH: $180,000 · Human ServicesTOUCHSTONE MENT…The Family Partnership: $135,000 · Human ServicesThe Family Part…MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $262,800 · PhilanthropyMINNEAPOLIS …COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $135,000 · EducationAMERICAN EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION: $40,100 · EducationJUXTAPOSITION ARTS INC: $125,000 · Youth DevelopmentACHIEVE TWIN CITIES: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentDogs For Our Brave Inc: $35,000 · Public Benefit
Other$983,735Health$375,000Human Services$315,000Philanthropy$262,800Education$175,100Youth Development$175,000Public Benefit$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $262,800 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRECLAIM: $180,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetTOUCHSTONE MENTAL HEALTH: $180,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWashburn Center for Children: $175,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPEOPLE INCORPORATED: $150,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $135,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Family Partnership: $135,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetJUXTAPOSITION ARTS INC: $125,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetACHIEVE TWIN CITIES: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY: $45,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION: $40,100 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetDogs For Our Brave Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetNAMI MINNESOTA: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMADISON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAROLD AND MICKEY SMITH JEWISH ACADEMY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMatthew 25 Ministries Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew Beginnings for Animals Inc: $535 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds RECLAIM ↗
  • Who funds TOUCHSTONE MENTAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Washburn Center for Children ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Family Partnership ↗
  • Who funds JUXTAPOSITION ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEVE TWIN CITIES ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Dogs For Our Brave Inc ↗
  • Who funds NAMI MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MADISON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Otto Bremer TrustMN19.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Otto Bremer Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Walser Foundation · Medica Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Minnesota Community Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Bentson Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Engler Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Engler Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Engler Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Engler Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Engler Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph