Skip to content

· Public charity

Energy Trust of Oregon Inc

Energy trust provides comprehensive, sustainable energy efficiency, conservation and renewable energy solutions to those we serve.

$318k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Environment$176kEmployment$109kHousing & Shelter$108kCommunity Improvement$95kArts & Culture$33kHuman Services$20kYouth Development$10kInternational$10k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $201k
$37,615
Median grant
1
States reached
$96M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOME PERFORMANCE GUILD OF OREGON$95,000
ENERCITY COLLABORATIVE$54,400
GREEN NW$51,500
NAMC OREGON$37,615
PACIFIC CREST AFFORDABLE HOUSING$31,000
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON$22,917
LEVER ARCHITECTURE PC$18,947
ZIMMER GUNSUL FRASCA ARCHITECTS$6,429
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMON CONNECTIONS: $10k → 18%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 12%GROWING GARDENS: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Earth Advantage

Earth advantage is focused on advancing a more informed and humane housing market.we work to ensure the us housing market recognizes the elements of homes that create climate risk and values the characteristics of homes that provide (see…

Housing & Shelter
2
Oregon Energy Systems Technology and Research
Environment
3
Earth Day Oregon
—
4
Nw Energy Coalition

The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…

—
5
Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…

Community Improvement
6
Oregon Human Development Corporation

To promote economic and social advancement of farmworkers and disadvantaged individuals through the provision of education, training, advocacy and services that enhance self-sufficiency.

Human Services
7
Portland Energy Conservation Inc
—
8
Central Washington Hispanic Chamber of Commerce

We increase access to economic opportunities for business owners, entrepreneurs, and individuals in Central Washington by connecting and providing them with resources, representation, and opportunities to build community.

Community Improvement
9
Taking Ownership

Taking Ownership is a community and reparations-based organization in Portland, Oregon founded with the intention to activate and utilize community members and their resources for equitable change. Together we renovate and revive…

Community Improvement
10
House Our Neighbors

House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…

—
11
Rohingya Youth Association of Portland

To support Rohingya and Burmese immigrant and refugee families to become independent empowered and established in their new environment.

Arts & Culture
12
Neighborhood Economic Develop Corp

Nedco collaboratively builds human capital assets to strengthen neighborhoods and broaden participation in community ownership and governance. nedco is committed to projects that strengthen low-income households and the neighborhoods in…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Metropolitan Family Service; the most unlike its peers is All Ages Music Portland dba Friends of Noise. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
12/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOME PERFORMANCE CONTRACTORS GUILD OF OREGON: $95,000 · OtherHOME PERFORMANCE CONTRACTORS GUILD OF OREGONPACIFIC CREST AFFORDABLE HOUSING: $31,000 · OtherPACIFIC CREST AFFORDABLE HOUSINGOREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $22,917 · OtherOREGON STATE UNIVERSITYLEVER ARCHITECTURE PC: $18,947 · OtherLEVER ARCHITECTURE PCBLACK COMMUNITY OF PORTLAND: $10,000 · OtherCommunity Energy Project Inc: $10,000 · OtherAFRICAN AMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR HOMEOWNERSHIP: $10,000 · OtherSOLARIZE ROGUE: $10,000 · OtherEthiopian and Eritrean Cultural and Resource Cente: $10,000 · OtherAll Ages Music Portland dba Friends of Noise: $10,000 · Other350 DESCHUTES 350Deschutes: $10,000 · OtherPHILIPPINE AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF OREGON: $10,000 · OtherYOUTH ORGANIZED & UNITED HELP: $10,000 · Other+2 more: $13,234 · OtherENERCITY COLLABORATIVE: $54,400 · EducationENERCITY COLLABORATIV…GREEN NW: $51,500 · EducationGREEN NWNAMC OREGON: $37,615 · EmploymentNAMC OREGONLATINOBUILT FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EmploymentLATINOBUILT…UMPQUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterBIENESTAR INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterNORTHWEST HOUSING ALTERNATIVES: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterSolar Oregon: $10,000 · EnvironmentLAKE COUNTY RESOURCE INITIATIVE: $10,000 · EnvironmentTHE SUSTAINABLE LIVING CENTER: $8,372 · EnvironmentSeeds for the Sol Inc: $8,320 · EnvironmentCOMMON CONNECTIONS: $10,000 · Human ServicesMetropolitan Family Service: $10,000 · Human ServicesGrowing Gardens: $10,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST NATIVE CHAMBER: $10,000 · Community ImprovementLLOYD ECODISTRICT: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$271,098Education$105,900Employment$57,615Housing & Shelter$40,000Environment$36,692Human Services$30,000Community Improvement$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENERCITY COLLABORATIVE: $54,400 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetGREEN NW: $51,500 over 1y, 95% of budgetNAMC OREGON: $37,615 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetUMPQUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLATINOBUILT FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetNORTHWEST NATIVE CHAMBER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLLOYD ECODISTRICT: $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetSolar Oregon: $10,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetLAKE COUNTY RESOURCE INITIATIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCOMMON CONNECTIONS: $10,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetCommunity Energy Project Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBIENESTAR INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget350 DESCHUTES 350Deschutes: $10,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR HOMEOWNERSHIP: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEthiopian and Eritrean Cultural and Resource Cente: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPHILIPPINE AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF OREGON: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAll Ages Music Portland dba Friends of Noise: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHWEST HOUSING ALTERNATIVES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMetropolitan Family Service: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGrowing Gardens: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUTH ORGANIZED & UNITED HELP: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE SUSTAINABLE LIVING CENTER: $8,372 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHACIENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $6,805 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Collins FoundationOR39× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · Seeding Justice · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Worksystems Inc · Earth Day Oregon · Onpoint Community Credit Union · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · Hillman Family Foundations · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Energy Trust of Oregon Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Energy Trust of Oregon Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Philippine American Chamber of Commerce of Oregon: 86% of income from government
  • Lake County Resource Initiative: 48% of income from government
  • Hacienda Community Development Corporation: 48% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Family Service: 29% of income from government
  • African American Alliance for Homeownership: 17% of income from government
  • Umpqua Community Development Corp: 12% of income from government
  • Ethiopian and Eritrean Cultural and Resource Cente: 12% of income from government
  • Bienestar Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Growing Gardens: 6% of income from government
  • Youth Organized & United Help: 3% of income from government
  • Latinobuilt Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • All Ages Music Portland dba Friends of Noise: 1% of income from government
  • Northwest Housing Alternatives: 1% of income from government
  • Community Energy Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Energy Trust of Oregon’s filings →

More from the funding graph