· Private foundation
Emily Landecker Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k79 grants · $245k
- $10k–50k26 grants · $426k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $420k
- $250k+2 grants · $3.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SPORTS VENUE FOUNDATION DBA UVAC | $1,600,000 |
| UNH Foundation | $1,500,000 |
| UPPER VALLEY AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATI | $150,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $60,000 |
| UPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST | $55,000 |
| ADVANCE TRANSIT | $53,500 |
| Vermont Institute of Natural Scienc | $51,000 |
| REAL ORGANIC PROJECT | $50,000 |
| NORTHERN FOREST CENTER | $40,000 |
| Vital Communities | $33,000 |
| CONNECTICUT RIVER CONSERVANCY | $32,500 |
| HUBBARD BROOK RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| THE FAMILY PLACE | $25,000 |
| DARTMOUTH GEISEL SCHOOL OF MEDICINE | $25,000 |
| CENTER FOR NORTHERN WOODLANDS EDUCA | $25,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $182k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
119 repeat relationships: 102 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $194k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED2× · 2021–2025 · $3.9M · revenue +9%- NFNorthern Forest Center Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $502k · revenue +300%
- VFVISIONS FOR CREATIVE HOUSING SOLUTIONS6× · 2020–2025 · $425k · revenue +314%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of New Hampshireone grant, 2024 · $872k
- TOTown of Newport NHone grant, 2023 · $150k
- SFSustainable Forest Futures Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +924%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rooted in vermont since 1977, the vermont land trust unites land and lives for the enduring benefit of people and the place we share. we help people protect, care for, and connect to land. this includes the farms, forests, natural areas,…
Protect land along rivers, lakes and wetlands of vt; protect public access, wildlife habitat, scenic natural beauty, and ecological integrity.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
Northeast wilderness trust is a regional land trust working to preserve and restore forever-wild landscapes for nature and people in new york, vermont, new hampshire, maine, massachusetts and connecticut.
The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…
Advancing science and stewardship of adirondack waters.
The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.
The mission of the Organization is the conservation of the natural resources of the Lakes Region of New Hampshire, the preservation of wildlife habitat, the stewardship of lands that define the character of the region and its quality of…
Vermont public informs, educates, and entertains through public service journalism and enlightening content rooted in vermont. our storytelling enriches lives and fosters community connection and understanding.
Sudbury valley trustees, inc. ("the organization") works to protect natural areas and farmland for wildlife and people in the 36 communities that surround the sudbury, assabet, and concord rivers. the organization cares for some of the…
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
The Organization works with local landowners to permanently protect natural land and waters that define its community and enrich the quality of life by purchasing, managing, negotiating and developing conservations easements in the Upper…
How this is measured
103 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 103 of the 161 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Northern Forest Center Inc ↗
- Who funds VISIONS FOR CREATIVE HOUSING SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds VERMONT INSTITUTE OF NATURAL SCIENCE INC ↗
- Who funds Real Organic Project Inc ↗
- Who funds UPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds UPPER VALLEY HAVEN ↗
- Who funds ADVANCE TRANSIT INC ↗
- Who funds VITAL COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE VERMONT CENTER FOR ECOSTUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds Upper Valley Agricultural Association Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR NORTHERN WOODLANDS EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SHARON ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds HUBBARD BROOK RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HANOVER IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Sustainable Forest Futures Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HANOVER CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds THE KILHAM BEAR CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Headrest Inc ↗
- Who funds WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds Atlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc ↗
- Who funds UPPER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN STAGE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DKMS ↗
- Who funds White River Partnership Inc ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Couch Family Foundation · Mascoma Bank Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · Claremont Savings Bank Foundation · Hypertherm Hope Foundation Inc · Frank and Brinna Sands Foundation · Lane & Elizabeth C Dwinell Fdn · Granite United Way · Schon Family Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · The Help for People Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Emily Landecker Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Emily Landecker Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Southeastern Vermont Community Action Inc: 83% of income from government
- Connecticut River Watershed Council Inc: 40% of income from government
- The Family Place Inc: 38% of income from government
- Upper Valley Haven: 38% of income from government
- Advance Transit Inc: 18% of income from government
- Willing Hands Enterprises Inc: 17% of income from government
- Vermont Foodbank: 13% of income from government
- New England Aquarium Corporation: 12% of income from government
- Fairbanks Museum & Planetarium: 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
- Hubbard Brook Research Foundation: 6% of income from government
- Vital Communities Inc: 5% of income from government
- Northern Stage Company: 5% of income from government
- White River Partnership Inc: 4% of income from government
- The Vermont Center for Ecostudies Inc: 4% of income from government
- Upper Valley Trails Alliance: 3% of income from government
- Real Organic Project Inc: 1% of income from government
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
- The Sharon Academy Inc: 0% of income from government
- Vermont Institute of Natural Science Inc: 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Emily Landecker Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Emily Landecker Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Emily Landecker’s filings →