· Private foundation
Elizabeth K Galeana Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 60% of ELIZABETH K GALEANA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $409k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CROSSOVER COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC | $44,000 |
| THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN | $38,265 |
| FAMILY YOUTH INTERVENTIONS | $34,400 |
| MACOMB FOSTER CLOSET | $30,500 |
| JOY OF GIVING INC | $30,000 |
| ANA'S FRIENDS | $30,000 |
| BOOKS FOR COLLIER KIDS | $30,000 |
| LACES OF LOVE | $25,000 |
| HAVEN PLACE | $22,365 |
| VALERIE'S HOUSE SWFL | $21,950 |
| SWFL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES | $20,000 |
| WINGS OF SHELTER | $20,000 |
| DAVID LAWRENCE CENTER | $17,000 |
| TURNING POINT | $16,000 |
| YOUTH HAVEN | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $548k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCROSSOVER COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC5× · 2020–2024 · $200k · revenue +100% · 28% of their budget
- YHYOUTH HAVEN INC5× · 2020–2024 · $160k · revenue +409%
- BFBOOKS FOR COLLIER KIDS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $118k · revenue +76%
Funded once
- CYCOMPREHENSIVE YOUTH SERVICES INCone grant, 2020 · $86k · revenue +17%
- PCPACE CENTER FOR GIRLS COLLIERone grant, 2022 · $17k
- CCCOLLIER COUNTY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUEone grant, 2022 · $16k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The safe children coalition's mission is to protect children and youth, strengthen families, and build community.
The mission of the child protection center, inc. is the prevention, intervention and treatment of child abuse. we envision a community where children are safe from abuse and free to thrive. to successfully address the issue of child abuse,…
To provide homes for disadvantaged children.
Bays provides counseling & guidance to the youth of florida and provides services necessary to aid troubled youth & their families. bays partners with individuals, families, and communities to inspire change, growth, & success.
Our mission is to prevent child abuse and to aid child abuse victims and families by providing coordinated services in a safe, child-friendly environment from report and investigation through treatment and resolution.
To develop and provide services that enable children and families to realize their fullest potential.
The mission of children's haven is to provide temporary shelter to children in a safe, secure environment while their parents resolve a family crisis. each year hundreds of children ages birth through 17 years receive the nurturing care of…
To promote the healthy development of youth and families
The mission of children's advocacy center of collin county is to provide safety, healing, and justice to children victimized by abuse and neglect.
To deliver a well coordinated and multi-disciplined response to child abuse in an environment that puts children first
To promote policies that build effective primary prevention and early intervention systems of support for florida's children and families by engaging and enhancing the collective strengths of the individual children's services councils of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Joy of Giving Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CROSSOVER COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds Joy of Giving Inc ↗
- Who funds BOOKS FOR COLLIER KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds LACES OF LOVE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT INC ↗
- Who funds MACOMB FOSTER CLOSET ↗
- Who funds HAVEN PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds ANA'S FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA SOUTHWESTERN STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BELIEVE N BOOKS INC ↗
- Who funds BEDS 4 KIDS ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds Beverlys Angels Inc ↗
- Who funds YMCA of Metropolitan Detroit ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · Wildcat Run Charitable Foundation Inc · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Elizabeth K Galeana Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc — 2% of income from government
- Youth Haven Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Elizabeth K Galeana Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Elizabeth K Galeana Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.