Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Elizabeth C Fee Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$484k
Granted FY2019
2
Grants FY2019
2
Organizations funded FY2019
100%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2019
$241,771
Largest grant, FY2019
$241,771
Organizations funded a year
2 to 12
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
1
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 100% of the organizations Elizabeth C Fee Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $484k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
EducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20192$484k100%
FY201812$23k75%
FY20177$3kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Philanthropy$484kHealth$10kRecreation & Sports$6kAnimals$4kArts & Culture$4kYouth Development$1kEducation$1kHuman Services$1kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2019, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 13 grantees

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($486k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Elizabeth C Fee Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of California San Francisco Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Francisco Parks Alliance: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFrancisco Park Conservancy: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAncan Foundation: $2,500 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetSonoma Valley Museum of Art: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNorth Valley Animal Disaster Group: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of San Francisco: $1,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Historical Society: $1,350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKenyon College: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAdaptive Design Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetArchitectural Foundation of Santa Barbara: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAdopt a Family of Marin: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Tennis Advantage: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Elizabeth C Fee Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Elizabeth C Fee Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Elizabeth C Fee Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Elizabeth C Fee Foundation

How much does Elizabeth C Fee Foundation give?
Elizabeth C Fee Foundation reported 2 grants totaling $483,542 in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 12 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does Elizabeth C Fee Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2019, its largest causes are Philanthropy (95%), Health (2%), Recreation & Sports (1%).
Who are Elizabeth C Fee Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2019: University of California San Francisco Foundation ($5k), San Francisco Parks Alliance ($3k), Francisco Park Conservancy ($3k).
Does Elizabeth C Fee Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Elizabeth C Fee Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Elizabeth C Fee Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma, Marin Community Foundation, The San Francisco Foundation.
Where is Elizabeth C Fee Foundation based?
Elizabeth C Fee Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Elizabeth C Fee’s filings →

More from the funding graph