Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elizabeth Bixby Janeway Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$550k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$4.3MArts & Culture$3.6MEnvironment$3.0MHealth$1.6MHuman Services$465kInternational$452kFood & Nutrition$385kCrime & Legal$310kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k16 grants · $385k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
$50,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATURE CONSERVANCY$550,000
Individual grant recipient$325,000
STAND TOGETHER TRUST$260,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$150,000
VISION TO LEARN$100,000
FOOD FORWARD$100,000
ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER$100,000
FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY$100,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER TEXAS$90,000
DALLAS WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL$85,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES$80,000
LOS ANGELES OPERA$75,000
PEOPLE CONCERN$60,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA$55,000
WARFIGHTER MADE$55,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $570k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WARFIGHTER MADE: $55k → 11%WARFIGHTER MADE: $50k → 11%WARFIGHTER MADE: $50k → 11%WARFIGHTER MADE: $50k → 11%WARFIGHTER MADE: $45k → 11%WARFIGHTER MADE: $45k → 11%WARFIGHTER MADE: $45k → 11%WARFIGHTER MADE: $10k → 11%PEOPLE CONCERN: $60k → 14%PEOPLE CONCERN: $60k → 14%PEOPLE CONCERN: $50k → 14%PEOPLE CONCERN: $25k → 14%PEOPLE CONCERN: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Elizabeth Bixby Janeway Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Elizabeth Bixby Janeway Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 57 repeat orgs$615k to everyone else

57 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
8

Total granted

$13M
$215k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+42%

Still filing today

65%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthFood & NutritionInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.3M · revenue +28%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +92%
  • TS
    THE SEMINAR NETWORK INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $845k · revenue +170%

Funded once

  • GS
    GREATER SANTA BARBARA ICE SKATING ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +42%
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • CM
    CALVARY MURRIETA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
2
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
3
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
4
Los Angeles Conservancy

The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.

Arts & Culture
5
The Trust for Public Land

The trust for public land creates parks and protects land for people, ensuring healthy, livable communities for generations to come. in the past year, we helped communities to plan for parks and conservation, fund parks and conservation,…

Environment
6
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
9
Scholarship Foundation of Santa Barbara

The scholarship foundation of santa barbara inspires, encourages and supports santa barbara county students to and through college, graduate and vocational school by providing information, advising, and scholarships.

—
10
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
11
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Barbara Foundation; the most unlike its peers is New Harmony Fire Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/51
Grantees still filing
30/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2,615,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYIndividual grant recipient: $1,550,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLOS ANGELES OPERA: $570,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES OPERALOS ANGELES MUSIC CENTER: $325,000 · Other+41 more: $3,052,000 · Other+41 moreRANCHO LOS ALAMITOS FOUNDATION: $1,340,000 · Arts & CultureRANCHO LOS ALAMITOS FOUN…LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $1,250,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC…ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $520,000 · Arts & CultureARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF …SANTA YNEZ VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $255,000 · Arts & CultureSANTA YNEZ VALLEY HISTOR…+5 more: $235,000 · Arts & Culture+5 moreTHE SEMINAR NETWORK INC: $845,000 · EducationTHE SEMINAR NET…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $425,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TR…Teach for America Inc: $310,000 · EducationTeach for Ameri…NEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $240,000 · EducationNEW VILLAGE CHA…PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $200,000 · EducationPHILLIPS EXETER…LOS ANGELES LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $100,000 · Education+5 more: $180,000 · Education+5 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $1,135,000 · HealthPLANNED PA…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $265,000 · HealthPLANNED PA…VISION TO LEARN: $100,000 · HealthVISION TO …+2 more: $40,000 · HealthWarfighter Made: $350,000 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $220,000 · Human ServicesFOOD FORWARD INC: $335,000 · Food & NutritionCALIFORNIA RANGELAND TRUST: $35,000 · Food & NutritionFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $15,000 · Food & NutritionPacific Legal Foundation: $310,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$8,112,000Arts & Culture$3,600,000Education$2,300,000Health$1,540,000Human Services$570,000Food & Nutrition$385,000Crime & Legal$310,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2,615,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetRANCHO LOS ALAMITOS FOUNDATION: $1,340,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $1,250,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $1,135,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SEMINAR NETWORK INC: $845,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $520,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $425,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWarfighter Made: $350,000 over 8y, 18% of budgetFOOD FORWARD INC: $335,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $310,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $310,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $265,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSANTA YNEZ VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $255,000 over 9y, 11% of budgetNEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $240,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $220,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $200,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $190,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetPortal Schools: $180,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetLOS ANGELES WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL AND TOWN HALL: $125,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $120,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSTONE SOUP CHILD CARE PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATOR: $115,000 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA BOTANIC GARDEN: $110,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSANTA BARBARA MARITIME MUSEUM: $105,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetLOS ANGELES LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $100,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetVISION TO LEARN: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH POLICY INSTITUTE INC: $95,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSustainable Conservation: $90,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCLIENTEARTH USA INC: $85,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGIRLS WHO INVEST INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER SANTA BARBARA ICE SKATING ASSOCIATION: $50,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $45,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCRAFT CONTEMPORARY: $40,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA RANGELAND TRUST: $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPERFORMING ARTS CENTER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIDLAND SCHOOL CORPORATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNEW HARMONY FIRE ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 3y, 33% of budgetLQ FOUNDATION: $27,000 over 2y, 50% of budgetSANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA YNEZ PIRATE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOLDIERS PROJECT: $25,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCollegespring Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO LOS ALAMITOS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds THE SEMINAR NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Warfighter Made ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FORWARD INC ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA YNEZ VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE PAINTED TURTLE ↗
  • Who funds Portal Schools ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL AND TOWN HALL ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds STONE SOUP CHILD CARE PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATOR ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA BOTANIC GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA MARITIME MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES LEADERSHIP ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds VISION TO LEARN ↗
  • Who funds FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH POLICY INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Sustainable Conservation ↗
  • Who funds CLIENTEARTH USA INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA21.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Preston B & Maurine M Hotchkis Family Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Joseph Drown Foundation · Www Foundation · Santa Barbara Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · American Gift Fund · The Rose Hills Foundation · Weingart Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elizabeth Bixby Janeway Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elizabeth Bixby Janeway Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Elizabeth Bixby Janeway Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Elizabeth Bixby Janeway Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Elizabeth Bixby Janeway’s filings →

More from the funding graph