Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Elizabeth Allan & Warren Shelden Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
57
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$4.1MEducation$3.0MYouth Development$2.9MPhilanthropy$2.8MEnvironment$2.4MArts & Culture$1.9MHuman Services$1.8MFood & Nutrition$1.3MOther$0
02FY2024 · 57 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k34 grants · $833k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.7M
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASCENSION ST JOHN FOUNDATION$1,100,000
RACQUET UP DETROIT$300,000
HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM$275,000
UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MI$230,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY (THE)$200,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SE MI$125,000
UNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL$125,000
FORGOTTEN HARVEST$100,000
MATH CORPS$75,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY$75,000
DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS$75,000
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$70,000
CHILDREN'S CENTER$65,000
COALITION ON TEMPORARY SHELTER$60,000
GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$55,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $307k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHARITYWATER: $2k → 17%MOTOR CITY MITTEN MISSION: $25k → 10%MOTOR CITY MITTEN MISSION: $25k → 10%MOTOR CITY MITTEN MISSION: $20k → 10%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $25k → 21%DETROIT PHOENIX CENTER: $25k → 21%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $25k → 21%DETROIT PHOENIX CENTER: $25k → 21%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $10k → 21%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $10k → 21%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $10k → 21%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $10k → 21%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $10k → 21%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $10k → 21%ADULT WELL-BEING SERVICES: $5k → 21%ADULT WELL-BEING SERVICES: $5k → 21%ADULT WELL-BEING SERVICES: $5k → 21%ADULT WELL-BEING SERVICES: $5k → 21%ADULT WELL-BEING SERVICES: $5k → 21%BALDWIN CENTER (THE): $5k → 8%BALDWIN CENTER (THE): $5k → 8%BALDWIN CENTER: $5k → 8%BALDWIN CENTER (THE): $5k → 8%BALDWIN CENTER (THE): $5k → 8%BALDWIN CENTER (THE): $5k → 8%WE THE PEOPLE OF DETROIT: $11k → 21%WE THE PEOPLE OF DETROIT: $8k → 21%WE THE PEOPLE DETROIT: $2k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
OH
PA
VA
TN
NC
DC
OK
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$22M · 82 repeat orgs$542k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

82 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

82
17

Total granted

$22M
$517k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+20%

Still filing today

66%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH ST JOHN FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +24%
  • RU
    RACQUET UP DETROIT
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +19% · 26% of their budget
  • UNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOHN HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $150k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2017 · $125k
  • UC
    UNITED COMMUNITY HOUSING COALITIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +414%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Greater Detroit Health Transition Company

Gdahc mission: together with our partners, we empower and improve the health and economic vitality of individuals, organizations and communities by catalyzing the power of collaboration. gdahc vision: healthy people. healthy community.…

2
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

3
Detroit Regional Chamber

The chamber is the voice for business and works to power the economy for southeast michigan through public policy, advocacy and leading regional economic development and talent initiatives.

4
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

5
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
6
Delta Dental Fund

Delta dental fund's mission is to improve the oral health of the public and to advance dental science and the dental profession through research and education.

7
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
8
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
9
Michigan Water Environment Association

Be and create stewards for the water environment of michigan. provide high quality education for michigan's water professionals. educate and inform policy makers and the general public. promote scientifically sound environmental practices…

Environment
10
Trinity Health - Michigan

We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.

Health
11
Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education
12
Detroit Economic Growth Corporation

Promotion of activities to spur economic growth and revitalization in the city of detroit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital of Michigan Foundation and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%2%<5yr13%7%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr15%19%20–35yr14%27%35–55yr18%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr13%5%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr15%14%20–35yr14%24%35–55yr18%38%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
3/68
the rest of the field
12%
6,509/53,788

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/67
Grantees still filing
48/67
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MI — $1,420,000 · OtherUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SE MI — $906,573 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SE MIHURON PINES — $520,000 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $460,000 · OtherTHE HENRY FORD — $445,000 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY (THE) — $425,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S CENTER — $375,000 · OtherAccounting Aid Society — $370,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY — $450,000 · Other+58 more — $5,330,700 · Other+58 moreHENRY FORD HEALTH ST JOHN FOUNDATION — $1,770,000 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH S…HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $1,225,000 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH S…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION — $330,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL…DETROIT INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN — $175,000 · Health+11 more — $518,000 · Health+11 moreRACQUET UP DETROIT — $1,700,000 · Recreation & SportsRACQUET UP DET…DETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC — $1,110,000 · Recreation & SportsDETROIT RIVERF…NEIGHBORHOOD CLUB — $170,000 · Recreation & SportsNEIGHBORHOOD C…UNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL — $1,350,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …Math Corps — $365,000 · EducationMath CorpsCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES — $200,000 · EducationCOLLEGE FOR…MERCY EDUCATION PROJECT — $177,500 · EducationMERCY EDUCA…GROSSE POINTE FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION — $80,000 · Education+2 more — $57,500 · EducationTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS — $766,988 · Arts & CultureHistoric Elmwood Foundation — $230,000 · Arts & CultureDetroit Historical Society — $115,000 · Arts & CultureHENRY FORD ESTATE — $75,000 · Arts & CultureFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC — $815,000 · Food & NutritionGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $265,000 · Food & NutritionALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS — $327,500 · Housing & ShelterCOTS — $180,000 · Housing & ShelterUNITED COMMUNITY HOUSING COALITION — $100,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$10,702,273Health$4,018,000Recreation & Sports$2,980,000Education$2,230,000Arts & Culture$1,186,988Food & Nutrition$1,080,000Housing & Shelter$607,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH ST JOHN FOUNDATION — $1,770,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetRACQUET UP DETROIT — $1,700,000 over 8y, 26% of budgetUNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL — $1,350,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $1,225,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC — $1,110,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC — $815,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS — $766,988 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY — $450,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetAccounting Aid Society — $370,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetMath Corps — $365,000 over 7y, 13% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION — $330,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS — $327,500 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $325,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $265,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT INC — $250,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetGROSSE POINTE FARMS FOUNDATION — $240,000 over 8y, 22% of budgetHistoric Elmwood Foundation — $230,000 over 8y, 40% of budgetCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES — $200,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCOTS — $180,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMERCY EDUCATION PROJECT — $177,500 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetDETROIT INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN — $175,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CLUB — $170,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $170,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS OF MICHIGAN — $140,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetHOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST INC — $135,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED MICHIGAN COUNCIL — $135,000 over 8y, 7.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center — $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDetroit Historical Society — $115,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUPPER BLACK RIVER COUNCIL INC — $110,000 over 8y, 41% of budgetHOLY CROSS SERVICES INC — $110,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetYMCA of Metropolitan Detroit — $110,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMARINERS INN — $100,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMACOMB COUNTY WARMING CENTER — $100,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetMOROSS GREENWAY PROJECT — $96,000 over 5y, 28% of budgetMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc — $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGROSSE POINTE FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION — $80,000 over 5y, 9.4% of budgetHENRY FORD ESTATE — $75,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetMOTOR CITY MITTEN MISSION — $70,000 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetRUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY — $65,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHREE PILLARS AN EDUCATIONAL SERVICE PROVIDER — $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDETROIT PHOENIX CENTER — $50,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetAVALON HEALING CENTER — $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetALMA COLLEGE — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN — $34,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ROUGE — $31,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetROSE HILL CENTER INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH ST JOHN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RACQUET UP DETROIT
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
  • Who funds DETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC
  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY
  • Who funds Accounting Aid Society
  • Who funds Math Corps
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN
  • Who funds TURNING POINT INC
  • Who funds GROSSE POINTE FARMS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Historic Elmwood Foundation
  • Who funds COLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES
  • Who funds COTS
  • Who funds MERCY EDUCATION PROJECT
  • Who funds DETROIT INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CLUB
  • Who funds DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds CROSSROADS OF MICHIGAN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI54.7× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Dte Energy Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · McGregor Fund · The Kresge Foundation · The Skillman Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Ethel and James Flinn Foundation · The Fred & Barbara Erb Family Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Elizabeth Allan & Warren Shelden Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Boys & Girls Club of Martin County2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Elizabeth Allan & Warren Shelden Fund?

Find your warmest path to Elizabeth Allan & Warren Shelden Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 101 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph