Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elise Bear & William D Pollak Family Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$54kAnimals$24kRecreation & Sports$23kHuman Services$17kReligion$15kFood & Nutrition$9kArts & Culture$7kEnvironment$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
7
States reached
$452k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION AHAVATH CHESED$2,618
HADASSAH$1,000
AUTISM PENSACOLA$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS FL - ESCAMBIA CNTY$1,000
DREAMS COME TRUE$1,000
MAZON$1,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION NAT'L$500
SHRINER HOSPITAL$500
GOLDRINGWOLDENBERG INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE$500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$500
COCOA PACKS FOR KIDS$500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $250 → 13%SONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $250 → 13%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
LA
MS
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$169k · 39 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
10

Total granted

$169k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+17%

Still filing today

46%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CASHIERS HIGHLANDS HUMANE SOCIETY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $13k · revenue +32%
  • DC
    DREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSONVILLE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $8k · revenue +113%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $7k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +23%
  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 6940graduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +201%
  • TI
    TSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN
    one grant, 2018 · $750 · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
2
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
3
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
6
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
7
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
8
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
9
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
10
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
11
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
12
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Woldenberg Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
20/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Arc Gateway Inc: $16,000 · OtherThe Arc Gateway IncDREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSONVILLE INC: $8,000 · OtherDREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSONVILLE INCIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRIVER GARDENS HEBREW HOME: $7,000 · OtherRIVER GARDENS HEBREW HOMESPECIAL OLYMPICS FL - DUVAL CNTY: $7,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS FL - DUVAL CNTYTEMPLE BETHEL: $7,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETHELIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSPECIAL OLYMPICS FL - ESCAMBIA CNTY: $7,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS FL - ESCAMBIA CNTYTHOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FUND: $5,500 · Other+30 more: $58,368 · Other+30 moreCASHIERS HIGHLANDS HUMANE SOCIETY: $13,445 · AnimalsCASHIERS HIG…JACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $3,500 · AnimalsJACKSONVILLE…WILDLIFE SANCTUARY OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $3,250 · AnimalsWILDLIFE SAN…+1 more: $250 · AnimalsST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 · HealthST JUDE C…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $4,000 · HealthAMERICAN …MARCH OF DIMES INC: $3,500 · HealthMARCH OF …ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 · HealthJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesSONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $500 · Human ServicesMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $4,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD LIFELINE: $500 · Food & NutritionSCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA: $3,000 · PhilanthropyWOLDENBERG FOUNDATION: $1,500 · PhilanthropyWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $3,000 · Environment
Other$129,868Animals$20,445Health$15,000Human Services$6,000Food & Nutrition$4,500Philanthropy$4,500Environment$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Arc Gateway Inc: $16,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCASHIERS HIGHLANDS HUMANE SOCIETY: $13,445 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetDREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSONVILLE INC: $8,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $4,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $4,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $4,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE SANCTUARY OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $3,250 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA: $3,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetINSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetStoryBook Treasures Inc: $2,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWOLDENBERG FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM PENSACOLA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Arc Gateway Inc ↗
  • Who funds CASHIERS HIGHLANDS HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds DREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSONVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER ORLANDO INC ↗
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds JACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE SANCTUARY OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE ↗
  • Who funds StoryBook Treasures Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOLDENBERG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Landrum Family Foundation IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Landrum Family Foundation Inc · Robert H Kahn Jr Family Foundation Dtd 6/16/98 · The Bear Family Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elise Bear & William D Pollak Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elise Bear & William D Pollak Family Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Manna Food Bank Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children: 0% of income from government
  • The Arc Gateway Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Elise Bear & William D Pollak Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph