Skip to content

Colorado · Private foundation

Eliot Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$204k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
12
Grants FY2025
6
Organizations funded FY2024
17%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,152
Largest grant, FY2025
$135,500
Organizations funded a year
6 to 23
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
4
Total assets, FY2025
$840k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 17% of the organizations Eliot Charitable Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 3% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEnvironmentEducationAnimalsRecreation & SportsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving12$204k42%
FY20246$44k17%
FY20237$47k29%
FY202210$26k30%
FY20218$86k38%
FY202011$92k18%
FY201923$128k74%
FY201810$69kn/a
87% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Environment$426kArts & Culture$52kEducation$35kAnimals$31kPhilanthropy$26kInternational$19kRecreation & Sports$15kHealth$10kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Denver Botanic Gardens Inc$367,00080%
The Garden Club of America$50,00030%
Southern Methodist University$20,00010%
Hope Haven Charitable Trust$18,55470%
Austin Pets Alive Inc$15,32560%
The Western Stock Show Association$11,03720%
Denver Dumb Friends League$8,70040%
American Cancer Society Inc$5,27510%
Graland Country Day School$5,00010%
Saint John's Cathedral in the Wilderness$4,0003n/a
Show all 28 grantees
All grantees of Eliot Charitable Trust by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Denver Botanic Gardens Inc$367,00080%
The Garden Club of America$50,00030%
Southern Methodist University$20,00010%
Hope Haven Charitable Trust$18,55470%
Austin Pets Alive Inc$15,32560%
The Western Stock Show Association$11,03720%
Denver Dumb Friends League$8,70040%
American Cancer Society Inc$5,27510%
Graland Country Day School$5,00010%
Saint John's Cathedral in the Wilderness$4,0003n/a
Denver Debutante Ball Inc$3,80022%
Denver Zoological Foundation$2,60040%
Garden Club of Denver$2,5001n/a
Rocky Mountain Conservancy$2,50010%
Save The Bay$2,50010%
Charity Global Inc$2,50010%
Challenged Athletes Inc$2,50010%
Escuela de Guadalupe Elementary School$2,5001n/a
Steamboat Springs Winter Sports Club Inc$1,50010%
Casa De Paz$1,00010%
High Line Canal Conservancy$75620%
Denver Rescue Mission$75020%
Red Fern Animal Rescue$50010%
The Park People$50020%
Colorado Cattlemen's Agricultural Land Trust$25810%
Steamboat Art Museum$25010%
Raft(Resource Area for Teaching)Colorado$25010%
Clothes to Kids of Denver Inc$25010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 15 recipients with no EIN on record ($163k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Eliot Charitable Trust supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDenver Botanic Gardens Inc: $367,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetThe Garden Club of America: $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHope Haven Charitable Trust: $18,554 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAustin Pets Alive Inc: $15,325 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Western Stock Show Association: $11,037 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDenver Dumb Friends League: $8,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Cancer Society Inc: $5,275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGraland Country Day School: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDenver Debutante Ball Inc: $3,800 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetDenver Zoological Foundation: $2,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRocky Mountain Conservancy: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Bay: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCharity Global Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChallenged Athletes Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSteamboat Springs Winter Sports Club Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCasa De Paz: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHigh Line Canal Conservancy: $756 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDenver Rescue Mission: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRed Fern Animal Rescue: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Park People: $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetColorado Cattlemen's Agricultural Land Trust: $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSteamboat Art Museum: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRaft(Resource Area for Teaching)Colorado: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetClothes to Kids of Denver Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 25.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO29.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Boettcher Foundation · Western Union Foundation · McDermott Family Foundation Dba Altira Foundation · O'Neal Family Foundation · Robert E & Anne T Sneed Aka Family Foundation · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Eliot Charitable Trust with peer funders

About Eliot Charitable Trust

How much does Eliot Charitable Trust give?
Eliot Charitable Trust reported 12 grants totaling $204,105 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 23 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Eliot Charitable Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (59%), Arts & Culture (7%), Education (5%).
Who are Eliot Charitable Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: Denver Botanic Gardens Inc ($367k), The Garden Club of America ($50k), Southern Methodist University ($20k).
Does Eliot Charitable Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 17% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Eliot Charitable Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Eliot Charitable Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Colorado Gives Foundation, The Denver Foundation, Rose Community Foundation.
Where is Eliot Charitable Trust based?
Eliot Charitable Trust is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eliot’s filings →

More from the funding graph