· Private foundation
Eisai USA Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k31 grants · $143k
- $10k–50k32 grants · $520k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $255k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS | $95,000 |
| Massachusetts General Hospital | $60,000 |
| ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA | $50,000 |
| The James M Dixon Foundation | $50,000 |
| Boston Children's Hospital | $35,000 |
| Alzheimer's Greater Los Angeles | $35,000 |
| AltaMed Foundation | $30,000 |
| US Aging | $25,000 |
| ADLER APHASIA CENTER | $25,000 |
| Dementia Alliance of North Carolina | $25,000 |
| Patient Access Network (PAN) Foundation | $25,000 |
| Giving Voice Initiative | $25,000 |
| Pink Fund Inc | $20,000 |
| Breast Cancer Alliance Inc | $20,000 |
| Institute on Aging | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $425k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 34% of Eisai USA Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 14% of the giving stays in NJ; read by stated purpose it is 11% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 53 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $628k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches4× · 2022–2025 · $320k · revenue +23%
- FRFAMILY REACH FOUNDATION3× · 2021–2023 · $160k · revenue +7%
- CCCancer Care Inc2× · 2020–2021 · $125k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- HUHarvard University Dept of Chemistry& Chemical Bioone grant, 2020 · $920k
- TAThe American Red Crossone grant, 2020 · $100k
- CNCHILD NEUROLOGY EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue -64%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.
Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.
Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…
To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.
The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…
Our mission is to help people affected by cancer enhance their health and well-being through participation in a professional program of emotional support, education and hope. all services are offered at no cost to people with cancer and…
Dedicated to the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer around the globe for the women who need it most.
The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).
FCANCER IS dedicated to advancing health equity through early detection and prevention programs, and by providing resources to navigate, manage, and cope with cancer.
Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cancer Care Inc and the most unlike its peers is Carversville Farm Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
109 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 109 of the 141 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds FAMILY REACH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Cancer Care Inc ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds ADLER APHASIA CENTER ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds CHILD NEUROLOGY EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE HEALTH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MAIN LINE HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds ROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JCC FUND ↗
- Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
- Who funds CURE VIOLENCE GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds TABLE TO TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds ALTAMED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS ↗
- Who funds USAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S ↗
- Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Unite for HER ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN NURSES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY NURSES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds USAGING ↗
- Who funds GIVING VOICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds DEMENTIA ALLIANCE OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds Community Hope Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Investors Foundation Inc · McKesson Foundation Inc · Columbia Bank Foundation · Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · The Provident Bank Foundation · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Blue Foundry Charitable Foundation Inc · Duke University Health System Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · Pseg Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Eisai USA Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Hope Inc — 41% of income from government
- Cooperative Elder Services Inc — 36% of income from government
- Newbridge Services Inc — 24% of income from government
- Moveable Feast Inc — 18% of income from government
- Adler Aphasia Center — 12% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Boston Higashi School Inc — 5% of income from government
- Ywca Northeastern Massachusetts Inc — 5% of income from government
- Sharsheret Inc — 4% of income from government
- United Way of Northern New Jersey Inc — 3% of income from government
- Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc — 1% of income from government
- CROSSROADS4HOPE — 1% of income from government
- Students 2 Science Inc — 1% of income from government
- New Concepts for Living Inc — 0% of income from government
- Better Day Adult Social Day Program Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Eisai USA Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Eisai USA Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.