Skip to content
Eisai USA Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Eisai USA Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$823k
Granted FY2026still arriving
72
Grants FY2026still arriving
23
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Science & Tech$2.8MHealth$2.1MEducation$1.1MPublic Safety & Disaster$431kHuman Services$192kFood & Nutrition$71kArts & Culture$54kCommunity Improvement$51kOther$0
02FY2026 · 72 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k42 grants · $193k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $380k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $250k
$5,000
Median grant
23
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The James M Dixon Foundation$50,000
Melanin Minded Foundation$50,000
Icahn School of Medicine At Mt Sinai$50,000
TimeSlips Creative Storytelling$50,000
National Council of Dementia Minds$50,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$35,000
Tom Coughlin Jay Fund$25,000
Comprehensive Care for Brain Health (Miami Univ)$25,000
Alzheimer's & Dementia Resource Center$25,000
Twilight Wish Foundation$25,000
ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$25,000
Institute on Aging$20,000
Alzheimer's Association Inc$15,000
Cancer Carepoint$15,000
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–26, $545k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Cooperative Elder Services Inc: $15k → 8%Twilight Wish Foundation: $25k → 6%Institute on Aging: $20k → 10%Dream Foundation: $10k → 14%Somerset Hills YMCA: $5k → 5%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $95k → 16%Latinas Leading Tomorrow: $2k → 7%Institute on Aging: $20k → 10%Japanese American Social Services Inc: $9k → 17%Learning Together Inc: $3k → 8%Community Hope Inc: $25k → 4%Crossroads 4 Hope: $5k → 5%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $75k → 16%Learning Together Inc: $3k → 8%Crossroads 4 Hope: $5k → 5%American National Red Cross: $50k → 16%Center for Volunteer Caregiving: $6k → 8%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $35k → 16%Better Day Adult Social Day Program Inc: $10k → 8%Japanese American Social Services Inc: $3k → 17%Tammy Lynn Memorial Foundation Inc: $3k → 8%Caring Hand for Children: $10k → 14%The Center for Volunteer Caregiving: $3k → 8%American National Red Cross: $100k → 14%Bergen Family Center: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
MO
KY
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
LA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 34% of Eisai USA Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 14% of the giving stays in NJ; by stated purpose, 11%.

Eisai USA Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 60 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

60 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2026, 23 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
79

Total granted

$2.2M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
0%

Still filing today

83%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $426k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2022–2026 · $355k · revenue +23%
  • FR
    FAMILY REACH FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $160k · revenue +7%
  • CC
    Cancer Care Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $125k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • HU
    Harvard University Dept of Chemistry& Chemical Bio
    one grant, 2020 · $920k
  • TA
    The American Red Cross
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • CN
    CHILD NEUROLOGY EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue -64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Children's Hospital Cancer Care Inc

To oversee, coordinate and support the Pediatric Oncology Programs at Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc.

Health
2
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
3
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
4
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
5
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
6
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
7
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
8
Fcancer

FCANCER IS dedicated to advancing health equity through early detection and prevention programs, and by providing resources to navigate, manage, and cope with cancer.

Health
9
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
10
Ralph Lauren Center for Cancer Care and Prevention

The Ralph Lauren Center for Cancer Care and Prevention was incorporated in 2002 in the State of New York as a non-for-profit organization to provide individuals, many of whom are medically underserved - with access to the highest quality…

—
11
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
12
CureCervicalCancer

Dedicated to the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer around the globe for the women who need it most.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cancer Care Inc; the most unlike its peers is Carversville Farm Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

136 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 136 of the 176 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
37
Early backer (in before they grew)
136/136
Grantees still filing
81/136
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

President and Fellows of Harvard College: $2,760,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College+13 more: $307,500 · Education+13 moreHarvard University Dept of Chemistry& Chemical Bio: $920,000 · OtherHarvard University Dept of Chemis…The James M Dixon Foundation: $100,000 · OtherThe American Red Cross: $100,000 · OtherConquer Cancer ASCO foundation: $75,000 · Other+69 more: $1,054,225 · Other+69 moreFAMILY REACH FOUNDATION: $160,000 · HealthFAMILY REACH FOUNDATIONCancer Care Inc: $125,000 · HealthCancer Care IncALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $125,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION …ADLER APHASIA CENTER: $95,000 · HealthADLER APHASIA CENTERBERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC: $85,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation: $85,000 · HealthCHILD NEUROLOGY EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $75,000 · HealthCAMBRIDGE HEALTH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · Health+49 more: $784,000 · Health+49 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $355,000 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE ON AGING: $40,000 · Human ServicesTWILIGHT WISH FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Hope Inc: $25,000 · Human Services+13 more: $105,000 · Human ServicesROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyTHE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropySAIL BEYOND CANCER USA INC: $7,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,500 · PhilanthropyTABLE TO TABLE INC: $39,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $10,000 · Food & NutritionCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK: $8,000 · Food & NutritionCARVERSVILLE FARM FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Food & NutritionPENNSYLVANIA HOME OF THE SPARROW: $3,000 · Food & NutritionGIVING VOICE INITIATIVE: $25,000 · Arts & CultureORPHEUS CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureJAPANESE CHILDREN'S SOCIETY INC: $2,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $430 · Arts & Culture
Education$3,067,500Other$2,249,225Health$1,609,000Human Services$550,000Philanthropy$104,000Food & Nutrition$65,000Arts & Culture$52,430

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $2,760,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $355,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY REACH FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCancer Care Inc: $125,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $125,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADLER APHASIA CENTER: $95,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetBERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC: $85,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $85,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD NEUROLOGY EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCAMBRIDGE HEALTH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJCC FUND: $50,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAIN LINE HEALTH INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCURE VIOLENCE GLOBAL: $45,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetINSTITUTE ON AGING: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTABLE TO TABLE INC: $39,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $35,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnite for HER: $30,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUSAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOOL KIDS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION INC: $28,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetFOR PETE'S SAKE CANCER RESPITE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEMERGENCY NURSES ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMITH FARM LTD: $25,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEMENTIA ALLIANCE OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCommunity Hope Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY: $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPINK FUND INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN NURSES FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOVEABLE FEAST INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetORPHEUS CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSTUDENTS 2 SCIENCE INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCARING HOUSE INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBOSTON HIGASHI SCHOOL INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSing Me A Story Foundation: $17,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetKAY YOW CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CLIFTON INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCooperative Elder Services Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Investors Foundation …McKesson Foundation I…Columbia Bank Foundat…Pharmaceutical Resear…The Provident Bank Fo…Triangle Community Fo…AbbVie FoundationBlue Foundry Charitab…Duke University Healt…Td Charitable Foundat…Pseg Foundation Inc
Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ21× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Investors Foundation Inc · McKesson Foundation Inc · Columbia Bank Foundation · Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · The Provident Bank Foundation · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Blue Foundry Charitable Foundation Inc · Duke University Health System Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · Pseg Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eisai USA Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eisai USA Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 170%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Community Hope Inc: 41% of income from government
  • Cooperative Elder Services Inc: 36% of income from government
  • Newbridge Services Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Moveable Feast Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Adler Aphasia Center: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Boston Higashi School Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Ywca Northeastern Massachusetts Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • United Way of Northern New Jersey Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc: 1% of income from government
  • CROSSROADS4HOPE: 1% of income from government
  • Students 2 Science Inc: 1% of income from government
  • New Concepts for Living Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Better Day Adult Social Day Program Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
17get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Eisai USA Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Eisai USA Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 176 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eisai USA’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home