Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Edward S Moore Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$925k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Crime & Legal$1.3MHealth$1.3MPhilanthropy$994kEducation$754kInternational$505kHousing & Shelter$500kHuman Services$488kYouth Development$353kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $590k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $300k
$25,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROOKLYN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$50,000
SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC$50,000
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW$50,000
LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW$50,000
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC$50,000
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW$50,000
CITIZENS FOR A BETTER SOUTH FLORIDA INC$40,000
ARTS FOR LEARNING MIAMI INC$40,000
RED HOOK INITIATIVE$40,000
AMEELIO INC$35,000
POSSIBILITY LABS$30,000
THE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC$30,000
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW$30,000
PROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC$30,000
THE CARVER INC$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $910k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%POSSIBILITY LABS: $30k → 10%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $60k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $40k → 20%CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE: $150k → 9%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $40k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $30k → 20%CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE: $150k → 9%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $30k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $20k → 20%CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE: $25k → 9%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $15k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $15k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $15k → 20%YOUTH JUSTICE NETWORK INC: $20k → 17%YOUTH JUSTICE NETWORK INC: $20k → 17%YOUTH JUSTICE NETWORK: $20k → 17%URBAN GREENWORKS: $15k → 15%YOUTH JUSTICE NETWORK: $15k → 17%THE CARVER INC: $25k → 9%CARVER FOUNDATION OF NORWALK INC: $25k → 9%THE CARVER INC: $25k → 9%YOUTH JUSTICE NETWORK: $15k → 17%CARVER FOUNDATION OF NORWALK INC: $20k → 9%CARVER FOUNDATION OF NORWALK INC: $15k → 9%CARVER FOUNDATION OF NORWALK INC: $15k → 9%CARVER FOUNDATION OF NORWALK INC: $10k → 9%CARVER FOUNDATION OF NORWALK INC: $10k → 9%CARVER FOUNDATION OF NORWALK INC: $10k → 9%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC: $20k → 17%ABORTION COALITION FOR TELEMEDICINE INC: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Edward S Moore Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Edward S Moore Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.0M · 51 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

51 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
40

Total granted

$6.0M
$888k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
0%

Still filing today

51%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $235k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthPhilanthropyCivil RightsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CATALYST CT INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $580k · revenue +111%
  • II
    INSPIRICA INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $500k · revenue +15%
  • SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $410k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • AC
    ABORTION CARE NETWORK
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • SC
    SMITH COLLEGE- OFFICE OF GIFTS AND
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
  • BM
    BRANCHES MICRO-BUSINESS PROGRAM
    one grant, 2021 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
5
Justice Innovation Inc

The center for justice innovation is a non-profit organization that works to create a fair, effective, and humane justice system and build strong, thriving communities.

Crime & Legal
6
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
8
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
10
The New York Opportunity Network Inc Dba the Opportunity Network

The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.

Education
11
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sanctuary for Families Inc and the most unlike its peers is Flying High for Haiti Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyJewish Community Organizati…Pregnancy Support ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsCommunity FoundationsDomestic Violence ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Health Access Advocacy and …Independent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%37%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%32%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/66
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,499

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/62
Grantees still filing
32/62
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CATALYST CT INC — $580,000 · OtherCATALYST CT INCINSPIRICA INC — $500,000 · OtherINSPIRICA INCBRIDGEPORT CHILD ADVOCACY COALITION — $270,000 · OtherBRIDGEPORT CHILD ADVOCACY COALITIONTRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW — $250,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEWWOMEN'S PRISON ASSOCIATION AND HOME — $240,000 · OtherTRANSITION INC — $190,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $170,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY GLOBAL HEALTH RESEA — $170,000 · OtherTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC — $165,000 · Other+64 more — $2,084,500 · Other+64 moreSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $410,000 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FOR FAMI…THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC — $325,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR FAM…RED HOOK INITIATIVE — $265,000 · Human ServicesRED HOOK INITIATIV…THE CARVER INC — $155,000 · Human ServicesTHE CARVER INCYouth Justice Network Inc — $90,000 · Human ServicesYouth Justice Netw…+4 more — $75,000 · Human Services+4 moreBROOKLYN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $375,000 · PhilanthropyBROOKLYN CO…THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $255,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MIAMI F…FAIRFIELD COUNTY'S COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyFAIRFIELD C…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS INC — $40,000 · PhilanthropyJESUIT VOLUNTEER CORPS NORTHWEST — $27,500 · Philanthropy+3 more — $35,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC — $220,000 · HealthABORTION CARE NETWORK — $100,000 · HealthREPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACCESS PROJECT INC — $85,000 · HealthCraig Hospital — $40,000 · HealthNational Women's Health Network — $30,000 · HealthAPT Foundation Inc — $25,000 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $325,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUND — $75,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 · InternationalBARNARD COLLEGE — $50,000 · EducationARTS FOR LEARNINGMIAMI INC — $40,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR NEW EDUCATION INITIATIVES INC — $30,000 · EducationSYE INITIATIVE INC — $30,000 · EducationSADIE NASH LEADERSHIP PROJECT INC — $30,000 · EducationRANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC — $27,500 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $20,000 · Education+1 more — $5,000 · EducationNEW SANCTUARY MOVEMENT OF PHILADELPHIA — $75,000 · Civil RightsPEOPLE ACTING FOR COMMUNITY TOGETHER — $20,000 · Civil RightsTHE ALL IN TOGETHER CAMPAIGN INC dba ALL IN TOGETHER — $10,000 · Civil Rights
Other$4,619,500Human Services$1,320,000Philanthropy$782,500Health$500,000International$435,000Education$232,500Civil Rights$105,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCATALYST CT INC — $580,000 over 5y, 9.7% of budgetINSPIRICA INC — $500,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $410,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBROOKLYN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $375,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC — $325,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $325,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRED HOOK INITIATIVE — $265,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $255,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S PRISON ASSOCIATION AND HOME — $240,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC — $220,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTRANSITION INC — $190,000 over 8y, 9.4% of budgetTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC — $165,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARVER INC — $155,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetBROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC — $135,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetABORTION CARE NETWORK — $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetLawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law — $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYouth Justice Network Inc — $90,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACCESS PROJECT INC — $85,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetLawrence Hall — $77,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNEW SANCTUARY MOVEMENT OF PHILADELPHIA — $75,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND — $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetConprmetidosCorp — $65,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetFAMILY REENTRY INC — $55,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFAIRFIELD COUNTY'S COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE — $50,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCraig Hospital — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetARTS FOR LEARNINGMIAMI INC — $40,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $31,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR NEW EDUCATION INITIATIVES INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSYE INITIATIVE INC — $30,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetPROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSADIE NASH LEADERSHIP PROJECT INC — $30,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetJESUIT VOLUNTEER CORPS NORTHWEST — $27,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC — $27,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAPT Foundation Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES INCORPORATED — $25,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetWOMEN'S FUND OF MIAMI-DADE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE ACTING FOR COMMUNITY TOGETHER — $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS — $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MENDOCINO COUNTY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PHOENIX ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 50% of budgetTHE WORKPLACE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBlue Scholars Initiative Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATALYST CT INC ↗
  • Who funds INSPIRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds RED HOOK INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S PRISON ASSOCIATION AND HOME ↗
  • Who funds THE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds TRANSITION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARVER INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds ABORTION CARE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law ↗
  • Who funds Youth Justice Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACCESS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Lawrence Hall ↗
  • Who funds NEW SANCTUARY MOVEMENT OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds ConprmetidosCorp ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY REENTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIRFIELD COUNTY'S COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Miami Foundation …Fairfield County's Co…Ernest and Joan Trefz…The Robert Wood Johns…Mightycause Charitabl…The Near and Far Asso…New Canaan Community …Anna-Maria and Stephe…The Pitney Bowes Foun…The Tow Foundation IncJpmorgan Chase Founda…The Batchelor Foundat…
The Miami Foundation IncFL21.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Ernest and Joan Trefz Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Near and Far Association Inc · New Canaan Community Foundation Inc · Anna-Maria and Stephen Kellen Foundation Inc C/O Joel E Sammet & Co LLP · The Pitney Bowes Foundation · The Tow Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Batchelor Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Edward S Moore Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • The Workplace Inc — 100% of income from government
  • The Center for Family Justice Inc — 49% of income from government
  • Jesuit Volunteer Corps Northwest — 38% of income from government
  • Catalyst Ct Inc — 37% of income from government
  • Inspirica Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Apt Foundation Inc — 21% of income from government
  • The Carver Inc — 16% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Studios of Fairfield County Inc — 3% of income from government
  • The Watershed Institute Inc — 3% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Edward S Moore Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Edward S Moore Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 110 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home