Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edward Lamb Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Animals$202kHuman Services$120kArts & Culture$71kEducation$70kHealth$64kPhilanthropy$36kFood & Nutrition$29kEnvironment$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHERRY STREET MISSION$5,500
AMERICAN CANCER CENTER-LUCAS$4,500
UNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO$4,500
HUMANE OHIO$4,000
HOSPICE OF NW OHIO$3,500
VALENTINE THEATER$3,500
WOOD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$3,500
JENNINGS CNTR FOR OLDER ADULTS$3,000
LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND$3,000
FORT MEIGS ASSOCIATION$3,000
DOMINICAN SISTERS OF ST CECILIA$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
NATURE'S NURSERY$3,000
WILBERFORCE UNIVERSITY$3,000
WELSH ACADEMY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%TOLEDO DAY NURSERY: $500 → 18%TOLEDO DAY NURSERY: $500 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$671k · 45 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
4

Total granted

$671k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+21%

Still filing today

58%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsArts & CultureFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JENNINGS CENTER FOR OLDER ADULTS
    7× · 2018–2024 · $62k · revenue +63%
  • NN
    NATURES NURSERY CENTER FOR WILDLIFE REHAB & CONSR
    7× · 2018–2024 · $27k · revenue +183%
  • HO
    HUMANE OHIO
    7× · 2018–2024 · $24k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF TOLEDO
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • MV
    MAUMEE VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • TV
    TOLEDO VALENTINE THEATER
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeast Ohio Spca Inc

Animal shelter that focuses on adoption, spay and neuter, and other humane education with the goal of making euthanasia of healthy animals unnecessary.

Human Services
2
Animal Charity of Ohio Inc

The society is dedicated to promoting care for all animals. we strive to never turn away sick or injured. our goal is to bring about a world where humane societies are no longer necessary.

Animals
3
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
4
Toledo Animal Shelter Association

See schedule oto care for and to provide temporary and indefinite shelter and care for homeless and abandoned dogs and cats by promoting and sponsoring animal welfare education programs, adoptions, preventive veterinary care, and a…

Animals
5
Paws and Prayers Inc

None

Animals
6
Wayne County Humane Society

Finding committed, permanent homes for companion animals in our community; measurably reducing companion animal overpopulation; educating and promoting humane values.

Animals
7
Ohio Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The ohio society for the prevention of cruelty to animals works to prevent and stop cruelty to animals throughout ohio. our mission falls into three main areas: 1) intervention in cases of animal cruelty, 2) animal rehabilitation, and 3)…

—
8
Ohio Bird Sanctuary Inc

The ohio bird sanctuary is a public facility that offers care for injured & displaced wildlife, promotes conservation through education and stewardship and provides the opportunity for all individuals to make a connection with nature.

Crime & Legal
9
Humane Society of Sandusky County

Rescue and adopt domestic animals. Low cost spay and neuter programs. Prevent animal abuse.

Animals
10
Toledo Northwestern Ohio Food Bank

To enable other community organizations to end hunger. we strive to maximize community resources by effectively obtaining and distributing food through a food collection and distribution system.

Food & Nutrition
11
Columbus Zoological Park Association

Empowering people. saving wildlife.

Animals
12
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mobile Meals of Toledo Inc; the most unlike its peers is 4 Paws Sake. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST VINCENT FERRER: $44,000 · OtherST VINCENT FERRERAMERICAN CANCER CENTER-LUCAS: $40,250 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER CENTER-LUCASASSISTANCE DOGS OF AMERICA INC: $22,000 · OtherASSISTANCE DOGS OF AMERICA INCHOSPICE OF NORTHWEST OHIO: $21,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF NORTHWEST OHIOHELPING HANDS OF ST LOUIS: $20,500 · OtherHELPING HANDS OF ST LOUISIndividual grant recipient: $18,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY OF TOLEDO: $17,500 · OtherYMCA: $17,500 · OtherVALENTINE THEATER: $15,500 · OtherTHE PUPPY RESCUE MISSION INC: $14,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY HARBOR LIGHT: $13,000 · OtherLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND: $13,000 · Other+19 more: $104,000 · Other+19 moreBROOKE USA INC: $28,250 · AnimalsBROOKE USA INCNATURES NURSERY CENTER FOR WILDLIFE REHAB & CONSR: $27,000 · AnimalsNATURES NURSERY CENTER F…HUMANE OHIO: $24,000 · AnimalsHUMANE OHIOWOOD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $22,500 · AnimalsWOOD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIE…MAUMEE VALLEY SAVE A PET: $15,500 · AnimalsMAUMEE VALLEY SAVE A PETTOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY: $9,000 · AnimalsTOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETYPLANNED PETHOOD INC: $8,000 · AnimalsPLANNED PETHOOD INCTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $7,000 · Animals4 PAWS SAKE: $6,750 · AnimalsJENNINGS CENTER FOR OLDER ADULTS: $62,000 · HealthJENNINGS C…THE FORT MEIGS ASSOCIATION: $18,500 · Arts & CultureTHE LUCAS COUNTY-MAUMEE VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $9,750 · Arts & CultureTOLEDO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $8,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $12,500 · Food & NutritionMOBILE MEALS OF TOLEDO INC: $11,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD INITIATIVES: $5,250 · Food & NutritionUNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO: $22,000 · PhilanthropyBLACK SWAMP CONSERVANCY: $19,000 · Environment
Other$360,750Animals$148,000Health$62,000Arts & Culture$36,250Food & Nutrition$28,750Philanthropy$22,000Environment$19,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJENNINGS CENTER FOR OLDER ADULTS: $62,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBROOKE USA INC: $28,250 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetNATURES NURSERY CENTER FOR WILDLIFE REHAB & CONSR: $27,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetHUMANE OHIO: $24,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetWOOD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $22,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO: $22,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF NORTHWEST OHIO: $21,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK SWAMP CONSERVANCY: $19,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FORT MEIGS ASSOCIATION: $18,500 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetMAUMEE VALLEY SAVE A PET: $15,500 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND: $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $12,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREAT LAKES HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $11,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMOBILE MEALS OF TOLEDO INC: $11,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LUCAS COUNTY-MAUMEE VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $9,750 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetTOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY: $9,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PETHOOD INC: $8,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetWILBERFORCE UNIVERSITY WILBERFORCE UNIVERSITY: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTOLEDO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $8,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget4 PAWS SAKE: $6,750 over 7y, 21% of budgetCHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES: $6,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWOMENSAFE INC: $5,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD INITIATIVES: $5,250 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE VICTORY CENTER: $2,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTOLEDO DAY NURSERY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JENNINGS CENTER FOR OLDER ADULTS ↗
  • Who funds BROOKE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURES NURSERY CENTER FOR WILDLIFE REHAB & CONSR ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE OHIO ↗
  • Who funds WOOD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF NORTHWEST OHIO ↗
  • Who funds BLACK SWAMP CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE FORT MEIGS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MAUMEE VALLEY SAVE A PET ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GREAT LAKES HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE MEALS OF TOLEDO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LUCAS COUNTY-MAUMEE VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PETHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds WILBERFORCE UNIVERSITY WILBERFORCE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO OPERA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds 4 PAWS SAKE ↗
  • Who funds CHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds WOMENSAFE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD INITIATIVES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toledo Community Foundation IncOH45.8× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · The O-I Charities Foundation · United Way of Greater Toledo · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · Andersons Foundation · The Andersons Fund Supporting Organization · Robert C and Susan M Savage Family Foundation · The Tkbw Private Foundation · Stranahan Foundation · John & Virginia Hankison Foundation · Clement O Miniger Memorial Foundati Co Trust Company Family Office · Toledo Community Foundation Inc Seneca Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward Lamb Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward Lamb Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Edward Lamb Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Edward Lamb Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edward Lamb’s filings →

    More from the funding graph