Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edward C Raymund Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$279kHealth$94kArts & Culture$34kHuman Services$29kAnimals$27kReligion$13kYouth Development$13kScience & Tech$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $19k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$388k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Southern California$19,000
Mission Hospital$8,000
Otra Mas$5,500
Homefront America$5,000
San Juan Capistrano Mission$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Boys and Girls Club$2,500
Arapaho United Methodist Church$1,700
Acres of Love$1,200
San Juan Capistrano Historical Society$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,100
Kontrapunktus Neo-Baroque Chamber$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOMEFRONT AMERICA: $5k → 10%Homefront America: $5k → 10%HOMEFRONT AMERICA: $5k → 10%Homefront America: $5k → 10%ACRES OF LOVE: $2k → 10%ACRES OF LOVE: $1k → 10%ACRES OF LOVE: $1k → 10%ACRES OF LOVE: $1k → 10%Acres of Love: $1k → 10%Acres of Love Acres of Love: $1k → 10%ACRES OF LOVE: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$189k · 11 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
17

Total granted

$189k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+22%

Still filing today

64%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
    7× · 2018–2025 · $81k · revenue +32%
  • OI
    OTRA-MAS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $26k · revenue +72%
  • HA
    HOMEFRONT AMERICA INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $20k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Southern CA University of Southern California
    one grant, 2023 · $33k
  • MS
    Mission SJ Capistrano Mission SJ Capistrano
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • AQ
    AMERICAN QUARTER HORSE ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Apartment Association

The organization's mission is to represent the ethical members of the rental housing industry in all aspects of government affairs within the state of california, and to provide information, products and services which contribute to the…

—
2
California Association of Realtors

Shape, promote and protect an environment for the entire real estate industry, one in which california realtors can succeed in meeting the real property needs of consumers.

—
3
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
4
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
5
Usc Arcadia Hospital

To provide high-quality healing services while caring for the patient's emotional and spiritual needs and enabling them to achieve health for life.

Health
6
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
7
American Angus Association

To provide programs, services, technology and leadership to enhance the genetics of the angus breed, broaden its influence within the beef industry and expand the market for superior tasting, high-quality angus beef worldwide.

—
8
California Thoroughbred Breeders Association

To create an environment of education for the membership so as to bring about the betterment of the conditions for those involved in the agricultural production of california-bred thoroughbreds; to assist in all ways appropriate, including…

—
9
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
10
Association of California Symphony Orchestras

To provide leadership, knowledge-building, advocacy and connection to expand the vitality and impact of the orchestra and broader music community.

—
11
California Stormwater Quality Associatio

On behalf of california stormwater permittees, casqa advances sustainable stormwater management protective of california water resources. to advance sustainable stormwater management protective of california resources, casqa will: lead:…

Environment
12
The Jockey Club

The organization is dedicated to the improvement of thoroughbred breeding and racing. It fulfills that mandate by serving many segments of the industry through its subsidiary companies and by providing support to a wide range of industry…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Hospital Regional Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Redbird. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $245,135 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAUniversity of Southern CA University of Southern California: $33,435 · OtherUniversity of Southern…MISSION SJ CAPISTRANO: $16,500 · OtherMISSION SJ CAPISTRANOARAPAHO UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $7,100 · OtherARAPAHO UNITED METHODI…THE SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6,100 · OtherTHE SAN JUAN CAPISTRAN…San Juan Capistrano Mission: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherSJC BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $5,000 · OtherMission SJ Capistrano Mission SJ Capistrano: $5,000 · OtherOJAI ART CENTER: $3,500 · Other+17 more: $10,990 · Other+17 moreMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $81,300 · HealthMISSION HOSPITAL R…HOMEFRONT AMERICA INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesACRES OF LOVE: $8,500 · Human Services+1 more: $750 · Human ServicesOTRA-MAS INC: $25,550 · AnimalsLIVING SUCCESS CENTER: $11,615 · ReligionBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $4,000 · Youth Development
Education$245,135Other$97,625Health$81,300Human Services$29,250Animals$25,550Religion$11,615Youth Development$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $245,135 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $81,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOTRA-MAS INC: $25,550 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetHOMEFRONT AMERICA INC: $20,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetLIVING SUCCESS CENTER: $11,615 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetACRES OF LOVE: $8,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6,100 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN QUARTER HORSE ASSOCIATION: $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKONTRAPUNKTUS NEO-BAROQUE CHAMBER ORCHESTRA: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFRESNO ART MUSEUM: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPBS FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC: $130 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds MISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OTRA-MAS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEFRONT AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING SUCCESS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ACRES OF LOVE ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN QUARTER HORSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds KONTRAPUNKTUS NEO-BAROQUE CHAMBER ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds REDBIRD ↗
  • Who funds FRESNO ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds PBS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds JF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alger Chaney Charitable TrustCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alger Chaney Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward C Raymund Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward C Raymund Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Edward C Raymund Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Edward C Raymund Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edward C Raymund’s filings →

    More from the funding graph