Skip to content
Edith M Timken Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Edith M Timken Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$159kHuman Services$146kEducation$100kFood & Nutrition$90kInternational$150Public Safety & Disaster$100Community Improvement$50Civil Rights$50Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $1k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$602k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Assistance Dogs of the West$20,000
Santa Fe Pro Musica Inc$20,000
Food Depot$20,000
St John's College in Santa Fe$20,000
Think New Mexico$1,000
World Central Kitchen Inc$100
The Carter Center$100
Village Enterprise$50
Native American Rights Fund$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THINK NEW MEXICO: $1k → 12%Helping Hand for Relief & Development: $50 → 8%THINK NEW MEXICO: $1k → 12%Think New Mexico: $1k → 12%Think New Mexico: $1k → 12%Think New Mexico: $1k → 12%Food Depot: $20k → 12%Food Depot: $10k → 12%Food Depot: $10k → 12%Food Depot: $10k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%Think New Mexico: $1k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%Think New Mexico: $1k → 12%Food Depot: $10k → 12%Think New Mexico: $1k → 12%Food Depot: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
PA
CA
CO
MD
NM
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$495k · 9 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against +53% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$495k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+53%

Still filing today

56%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalArts & CultureEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SANTA FE PRO MUSICA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $152k · revenue +73%
  • AD
    ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST
    8× · 2018–2025 · $138k · revenue +138%
  • THE FOOD DEPOT
    8× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • SS
    STRATFORD SHAKESPEAR FESTIVAL
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • SS
    STRATFORD SHAKESPEAREAN FESTIVAL OF AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +84%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Fe Institute

The santa fe institute is a transdisciplinary research community that expands the boundaries of scientific understanding. its aim is to discover, comprehend, and communicate the common fundamental principles in complex physical,…

Science & Tech
2
Leadership New Mexico

Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.

Arts & Culture
3
The Fund for American Studies

The fund for american studies (tfas) seeks to create a brighter, more prosperous future by preparing young people for leadership and teaching them the ideas of freedom and a free-market economy. founded in 1967, tfas organizes programs for…

—
4
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
5
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
6
We Are Family Foundation

The we are family foundation celebrates the vision of a global family by creating and supporting programs that inspire and educate people about mutual respect, understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity.

Civil Rights
7
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
8
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
9
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
10
Council of the Americas Inc

Council of the americas is a business organization whose members share a common commitment to economic and social development, open markets, the rule of law, and democracy throughout the americas. the council's membership consists of…

—
11
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
12
Vida Mejor Capital Inc

Primary exempt purpose: at vida mejor capital, our mission is to empower new mexican small businesses through technical assistance and equitable access to capital, with a dedicated focus on advancing food justice, food sovereignty, and…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Think New Mexico; the most unlike its peers is Native American Rights Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $138,100 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WESTTHE FOOD DEPOT: $90,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPOTTHINK NEW MEXICO: $8,000 · Human Services+1 more: $50 · Human ServicesSANTA FE PRO MUSICA INC: $151,500 · Arts & CultureSANTA FE PRO MUSICA INC+1 more: $100 · Arts & CultureST JOHNS COLLEGE IN SANTA FE: $30,000 · OtherST JOHNS COLLEGE …St John's College in Santa Fe: $30,000 · OtherSt John's College…Individual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant …Stratford Festival: $4,600 · OtherStratford Festiva…+4 more: $5,215 · Other+4 moreST JOHN'S COLLEGE: $40,000 · EducationTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $100 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $100 · InternationalVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND: $50 · InternationalNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC: $50 · Civil Rights
Human Services$236,150Arts & Culture$151,600Other$76,815Education$40,000International$250Civil Rights$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANTA FE PRO MUSICA INC: $151,500 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $138,100 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $90,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetST JOHN'S COLLEGE: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHINK NEW MEXICO: $8,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSTRATFORD SHAKESPEAREAN FESTIVAL OF AMERICA: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ALMEIDA THEATRE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Slf FoundationGreater HorizonsMorgan Stanley Global…Jewish Communal FundNational Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Slf FoundationNM13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Slf Foundation · Greater Horizons · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edith M Timken Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edith M Timken Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • St John's College: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edith M Timken Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home