Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Edith M Timken Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$159kHuman Services$146kEducation$100kFood & Nutrition$90kInternational$150Public Safety & Disaster$100Community Improvement$50Civil Rights$50Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $1k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$602k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Food Depot$20,000
St John's College in Santa Fe$20,000
Santa Fe Pro Musica Inc$20,000
Assistance Dogs of the West$20,000
Think New Mexico$1,000
The Carter Center$100
World Central Kitchen Inc$100
Village Enterprise$50
Native American Rights Fund$50
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THINK NEW MEXICO: $1k → 12%Helping Hand for Relief & Development: $50 → 8%Think New Mexico: $1k → 12%Think New Mexico: $1k → 12%Think New Mexico: $1k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $1k → 12%Food Depot: $20k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%Food Depot: $10k → 12%Food Depot: $10k → 12%Think New Mexico: $1k → 12%Food Depot: $10k → 12%Think New Mexico: $1k → 12%Food Depot: $10k → 12%Think New Mexico: $1k → 12%Food Depot: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
PA
CA
CO
MD
NM
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$495k · 9 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +84% since the first grant, against +53% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$495k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+53%

Still filing today

56%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalArts & CultureEducationCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SANTA FE PRO MUSICA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $152k · revenue +73%
  • AD
    ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST
    8× · 2018–2025 · $138k · revenue +138%
  • THE FOOD DEPOT
    8× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • SS
    STRATFORD SHAKESPEAREAN FESTIVAL OF AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +84%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Fe Institute

The santa fe institute is a transdisciplinary research community that expands the boundaries of scientific understanding. its aim is to discover, comprehend, and communicate the common fundamental principles in complex physical,…

Science & Tech
2
Leadership New Mexico

Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.

Arts & Culture
3
The Fund for American Studies

The fund for american studies (tfas) seeks to create a brighter, more prosperous future by preparing young people for leadership and teaching them the ideas of freedom and a free-market economy. founded in 1967, tfas organizes programs for…

4
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
5
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
6
We Are Family Foundation

The we are family foundation celebrates the vision of a global family by creating and supporting programs that inspire and educate people about mutual respect, understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity.

Civil Rights
7
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
8
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
9
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
10
Council of the Americas Inc

Council of the americas is a business organization whose members share a common commitment to economic and social development, open markets, the rule of law, and democracy throughout the americas. the council's membership consists of…

11
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
12
Vida Mejor Capital Inc

Primary exempt purpose: at vida mejor capital, our mission is to empower new mexican small businesses through technical assistance and equitable access to capital, with a dedicated focus on advancing food justice, food sovereignty, and…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Think New Mexico and the most unlike its peers is Native American Rights Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST — $138,100 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WESTTHE FOOD DEPOT — $90,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPOTTHINK NEW MEXICO — $8,000 · Human Services+1 more — $50 · Human ServicesSANTA FE PRO MUSICA INC — $151,500 · Arts & CultureSANTA FE PRO MUSICA INC+1 more — $100 · Arts & CultureSt John's College in Santa Fe — $30,000 · OtherSt John's College…ST JOHNS COLLEGE IN SANTA FE — $30,000 · OtherST JOHNS COLLEGE …Individual grant recipient — $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant …Individual grant recipient — $4,600 · OtherIndividual grant …+4 more — $5,215 · Other+4 moreST JOHN'S COLLEGE — $40,000 · EducationTHE CARTER CENTER INC — $100 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $100 · InternationalVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND — $50 · InternationalNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC — $50 · Civil Rights
Human Services$236,150Arts & Culture$151,600Other$76,815Education$40,000International$250Civil Rights$50

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSANTA FE PRO MUSICA INC — $151,500 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST — $138,100 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT — $90,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetST JOHN'S COLLEGE — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHINK NEW MEXICO — $8,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSTRATFORD SHAKESPEAREAN FESTIVAL OF AMERICA — $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ALMEIDA THEATRE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SANTA FE PRO MUSICA INC
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT
  • Who funds ST JOHN'S COLLEGE
  • Who funds THINK NEW MEXICO
  • Who funds STRATFORD SHAKESPEAREAN FESTIVAL OF AMERICA
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ALMEIDA THEATRE INC
  • Who funds FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE
  • Who funds HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC
  • Who funds VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Slf FoundationNM13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Slf Foundation · Greater Horizons · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Edith M Timken Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • St John's College2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph